View clinical trials related to Prosthesis Survival.
Filter by:the aim of the study to compare the anterior maxillary bone index changes for patient rehabilitated with implant supported fixed prosthesis opposed by natural teeth
The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate the survival of JJGC Cobalt-Chromium (CoCr) prosthetic abutments in single-unit implant-supported prostheses, to confirm the long-term safety and performance of the devices.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the outcome of a Poly-ether-ether-ketone - acrylic resin prosthesis for full-arch rehabilitation of the atrophic maxillae through the All-on-4 Hybrid concept (standard and zygomatic implants) after one year of follow-up. The main question it aims to answer is: - What is the survival outcome of the full-arch implant-supported Poly-ether-ether-ketone - acrylic resin prosthesis? The participants already rehabilitated with dental implants will receive a Poly-ether-ehter-ketone prosthesis as a definitive prosthesis.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the outcome of a Poly-ether-ether-ketone - used in single teeth implant-supported rehabilitations after one year of follow-up. The main question it aims to answer is: - What is the survival outcome of single teeth implant-supported prosthesis using Poly-ether-ether-ketone? The participants already rehabilitated with a single tooth dental implant will receive a definitive prosthesis incorporating Poly-ether-ehter-ketone.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the outcome of a Poly-ether-ether-ketone - used in partial implant-supported rehabilitations after one year of follow-up. The main question it aims to answer is: - What is the survival outcome of partial implant-supported prosthesis using Poly-ether-ether-ketone? The participants already rehabilitated with dental implants will receive a definitive 3 unit prosthesis incorporating Poly-ether-ehter-ketone.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the outcome of a Poly-ether-ether-ketone - acrylic resin removable partial denture used in partial edentulous rehabilitation after one year of follow-up. The main question it aims to answer is: - What is the survival outcome of partial rehabilitations using Poly-ether-ether-ketone-acrylic resin removable partial dentures? The participants will receive a definitive removable partial denture incorporating Poly-ether-ehter-ketone.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the outcome of a Poly-ether-ether-ketone - acrylic resin prosthesis for full-arch rehabilitation of the atrophic maxillae through the All-on-4 concept after five years of follow-up. The main question it aims to answer is: - What is the survival outcome of the full-arch implant-supported Poly-ether-ether-ketone - acrylic resin prosthesis? The participants already rehabilitated with dental implants will receive a Poly-ether-ehter-ketone prosthesis as a definitive prosthesis.
The mechanical intervention is treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS) which may be performed using the standard open surgical approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The key question of this study is to establish the difference in all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months of follow-up, left ventricular reverse remodeling after adjustment for death, as assessed by means of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), in patients who received the TAVI vs the standard surgical procedure for AVS.
Registry of Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute: provides for the regular and systematic collection of all data (clinical and some PROMs) obtained from patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty to which questionnaires are proposed investigating the specific functional sphere of the joints undergoing surgery (Knee injuryOsteoarthritisOutcomeScore (KOOS-PS) and Hip injuryOsteoarthritisOutcomeScore (HOOS-PS) but also the sphere of general health (ShortForm health survey-12 (SF-12) and VisualAnalogueScale (VAS)) , in addition, of course, to the satisfaction rate.
Newly available ceramic CAD-CAM blocs containing a screw channel for chairside-made crowns to be adhesively cemented to a TiBase abutment and screw-retained to an implant are appealing to the clinician, considering the time efficiency (one appointment) and overall lower costs as no dental laboratory is involved. The hypotheses are that the biological (BOP, PD, PCR, implant bone level) and mechanical outcomes (fracture, loss of retention, wear) are equivalent to implant screw-retained Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal (PFM) crowns over a 5 year observation time.This RCT will provide key information as to the cost/benefit, suitability and/or limitations of these chair-side hybrid-abutment crowns in the posterior region.