Clinical Trials Logo

Prolapse clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Prolapse.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03658395 Active, not recruiting - Vaginal Prolapse Clinical Trials

Sacrocolpopexy With Posterior Repair Obstructed Defecation Symptoms

Start date: July 19, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Participants who undergo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) plus posterior repair (PR) will demonstrate greater improvement bowel symptom scores compared to participants who undergo LSCP alone at 3 months postoperatively.

NCT ID: NCT03522961 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Urinary Incontinence

Cranberry Tablets Versus Nitrofurantoin Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infection Prevention After Urogynecologic Surgery

Start date: August 15, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

We aim to compare the effectiveness of cranberry capsules versus nitrofurantoin prophylaxis in preventing urinary tract infections (UTIs) after urogynecologic surgery by conducting a double-blinded randomized clinical trial involving women with pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence scheduled to have surgery with the Urogynecologists who comprise the Brigham and Women's Urogynecology Group.

NCT ID: NCT03436979 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Uterine Prolapse Without Vaginal Wall Prolapse

The NeuGuide™ System for Vaginal Colpopexy in the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse

Start date: January 1, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The objective of the study is to assess the long term safety, durability of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the NeuGuide™ system when used for vaginal colpopexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.

NCT ID: NCT03427606 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Start date: January 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation.

NCT ID: NCT03378622 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Anchor for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

ARiSe
Start date: November 29, 2017
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

1. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of absorbable anchor compared to suturing for mesh attachment to vagina in robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy on the length of surgery for this portion of the procedure. 2. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: i. To assess intraoperative and ii. postoperative complication rates, iii. Intraoperative 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), to subjectively assess surgeon satisfaction with the technique iv. post-operative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) evaluation for anatomic failure and v. a VAS of the vaginal walls overall appearance

NCT ID: NCT03187054 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

POPQ Versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair During Vaginal Reconstruction

Start date: June 20, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective of the Preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension (PREPARE) trial is to compare surgical outcomes of POPQ-based surgery with simulated apical support-based surgery for anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse at the time of transvaginal apical suspension.

NCT ID: NCT03113513 Active, not recruiting - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Comparison of Two Apical Repair Methods in Women Undergoing Repairs for Prolapse

Start date: May 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To date no study has determined prospectively which technique is superior to prevent recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) after vaginal hysterectomy- a major unmet clinical need. The aim of the study is to determine objective anatomical recurrent prolapse after Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation (SLF) vs McCall.

NCT ID: NCT03053479 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh

SAME
Start date: September 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse, POP, is a common health problem affecting up to 40% of women. Very little is known about the factors associated with surgical failure. Studies have identified a variety of risk factors: younger age, high body mass index and advanced preoperative prolapse (grade III-IV) have been associated with an increased risk of reoperation in some studies. According to some studies patients had poorer anatomical outcome after traditional repairs but were able to enjoy the same quality of life as after transvaginal mesh surgery or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of these three procedures in a randomized controlled trial.

NCT ID: NCT03052985 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Materiovigilance After Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse Surgery

VIGI-MESH
Start date: February 14, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Observatory of Materiovigilance After Surgery of Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse in Women Implantable medical devices (meshes) used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (genital prolapse, rectal prolapse), or incontinence surgery may be source of severe complications.

NCT ID: NCT02943525 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Vaginal Packing After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Start date: November 14, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Vaginal packing is used routinely following vaginal reconstructive surgery, however, no recommendation regarding vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy exists. Despite little data to support the practice, purported benefits better positioning and fixation of the mesh, improving incorporation of the mesh by its fixation and reduced blood loss. Patients often complain of discomfort associated with the packing or its removal. The aim of this randomized controlled is to compare the subjective impressions of pain and bother in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy treated with and without packing. The investigators also aim to assess differences in postoperative bacteriuria, urine retention and hemoglobin levels on day 5 after the surgery and surgery outcome and complications at one year after the surgery in those with and without packing.