Mechanical Environment Pregnancy With Short Cervix

Preterm Birth Clinical Trial

— ATOPS  

Official title:

Quantifying the Mechanical Environment of Pregnancy Complicated With a Short Cervix With Ultrasound Imaging and Aspiration - Ancillary Study to the Trial of Pessary in Singleton Pregnancies Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03865108
• Other study ID #: AAAO4956 sub-study
• Secondary ID: 3UG1HD040485-18S
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 5, 2017
• Est. completion date: April 2019

Study information

• Verified date: April 2019
• Source: Columbia University
• Contact: Mirella Mourad, MD
• Phone: 347-880-0282
• Email: mjm2246[@]cumc.columbia.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this study is to quantify the mechanical environment of pregnancies complicated by a short cervix and randomized in the Trial of Pessary in Singleton Pregnancies with a Short Cervix study with ultrasound imaging and aspiration.

Aim 1: To determine the biomechanical properties of a prematurely remodeled cervix.

Aim 2: To determine the impact of pessary placement on the biomechanical properties of a prematurely remodeled cervix and establish if the pessary reduces the mechanical load on the cervix through computer modeling informed by ultrasonographic measurement and cervical stiffness measurements.

Aim 3: To determine if the differences in the cervical biomechanical properties after pessary placement lead to improved birth outcomes as compared to the progesterone only group.

Description:

In pregnancy the mother carries the growing fetus throughout gestation as her body prepares for delivery. This maternal preparation includes anatomical, physiological, and biochemical changes of the uterus, cervix, and ligaments that surround and support the uterus and cervix. For a successful term delivery, the uterus, cervix and supporting ligaments must remodel in a coordinated fashion to allow for adequate dilation and effacement of the cervix and delivery of the fetus.

Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of neonatal death. Premature babies that survive face a significantly increased risk of long-term disabilities, such as mental retardation, learning and behavioral problems, cerebral palsy, seizures, respiratory problems, gastrointestinal problems and vision/hearing loss. PTB is also significant cost factor in healthcare. In 2003, a study in the US approximated neonatal costs to be $224,400 for a newborn that weighed 500-700g (extreme-severe preterm range) verse $1,000 at over 3,000g. These costs increase exponentially with decreasing gestational age and weight. In 2007, an Institute of Medicine report entitled "Preterm Birth" found that the 550,000 preemies born each year in the U.S. cost $26 billion annually, mostly related to prolonged care in neonatal intensive care units. The pathophysiology of PTB is multi-factorial and the degree of severity spans a wide range, with pregnancy outcomes depending on a combination of congenital, anatomical, obstetric, epidemiological, and biochemical factors. Because of these confounding factors PTB rates in the US and around the world are on the rise and diagnostic methods to identify high-risk women for PTB remain elusive.

Premature cervical remodeling which leads to softening/shortening of the cervix (i.e., a mechanical failure of the cervix) is one of the leading contributors to the birth of a severely preterm neonate. The true frequency and impact is unknown because diagnosing this condition remains elusive and the biomechanical environment of pregnancy is unknown. The pathophysiology is hypothesized to be multi-factorial leading to a common feature of a structurally weak and excessively soft cervix that is unable to remain closed and to support the fetus. Recently, it has been demonstrated that these preterm cervical changes may in some cause premature cervical shortening as measured by transvaginal ultrasound imaging. When this occurs, treatment with progesterone suppositories has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of preterm delivery. However, this treatment is not effective in many cases; probably because a short cervix is a late manifestation of the underlying biostructural alterations in the uterus, cervix and supporting ligaments.

Many clinically-relevant advances in the field of orthopedics and gynecology (i.e., assessing the causes of uterine prolapse have been attributed to the accurate biomechanical modeling of the anatomy and tissue properties using finite element analysis (FEA). FEA is a computer simulation that computes tissue stretch (i.e., tissue strain), tissue stress, and reaction forces when external mechanical forces are applied to the system given the tissue's geometric shape and mechanical properties. Lastly, directly measuring the mechanical stiffness of the uterine cervix through use of a simple aspiration device has shown that in normal pregnancy cervical tissue softens starting in the 1st trimester and continues until dilation. These studies have also shown that using a simple mechanical aspirator applied to the end of the cervix protruding into the vaginal canal has zero adverse effects on the patient, where the measurement can be performed during a standard speculum exam.

The cervical pessary has been proposed as an additional option for treatment in pregnancies with a short cervix. It offers additional theoretical benefits over the cerclage, in that it does not require surgical intervention. Its proposed mechanisms of action include a) angling the cervix toward the posterior, bringing the external os toward the sacrum, b) mechanically closing the cervix with the constraining geometry of the device, and c) preserving the mucous plug. These mechanisms of action involve lowering the mechanical stresses on the area of the internal os, potentially modifying the release of the enzymes and inflammatory markers involved in the preterm birth pathway. However, it is still unknown if the pessary relieves the mechanical load on the cervix because a biomechanical investigation of its function has not been performed. Therefore, the investigator plans to study a group of women with a short cervix randomized in an existing trial: AAAR1353 - A Randomized Trial of Pessary in Singleton Pregnancies with a Short Cervix (TOPS) in order to better understand the function and effect of the cervical pessary on the biomechanical support of the cervix in addition to its effect on its tissue properties and structural integrity. If a specific maternal utero-cervical phenotype can be located, where the placement of the cervical pessary reduces the mechanical load on the cervical internal os and therefore leads to a decreased incidence of preterm birth, then a more personalized treatment may be possible for patients who fall within this specific phenotype in the future.

For the substudy, a total of 36 women will be recruited and randomized through the existing TOPS trial (18 randomized to Pessary and Progesterone and 18 randomized to progesterone only). Obstetric and gynecologic history, age, race, body mass index, smoking history, and outcome of the current pregnancy will be recorded for all patients.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 36
• Est. completion date: April 2019
• Est. primary completion date: April 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years to 50 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Singleton gestation.

• Twin gestation reduced to singleton either spontaneously or therapeutically, is not eligible unless the reduction occurred before 13 weeks 6 days project gestational age.

• Higher order multifetal gestations reduced to singletons are not eligible.

• Gestational age at randomization between 16 weeks 0 days and 23 weeks 6 days based on clinical information and evaluation of the earliest ultrasound as described in Gestational Age.

• Cervical length on transvaginal examination of less than or equal to 20 mm within 10 days prior to randomization by a study certified sonographer. There is no lower cervical length threshold.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Women who are ineligible for the TOPS trial.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Premature Birth
• Preterm Birth

Intervention

Procedure:
• Ultrasound imaging
This standard of care procedure is being done for research purposes and used to collect information and measure the maternal and fetal anatomy.
• Cervical speculum examination
This standard of care procedure is being done for research purposes and used to collect tissue and measure the strength and stiffness of cervix.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Columbia University Medical Center	New York	New York

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Columbia University	Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (23)

Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JO. On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:163-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124823. Review. — View Citation

Badir S, Bajka M, Mazza E. A novel procedure for the mechanical characterization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Nov;27:143-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 11. — View Citation

Badir S, Mazza E, Zimmermann R, Bajka M. Cervical softening occurs early in pregnancy: characterization of cervical stiffness in 100 healthy women using the aspiration technique. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Aug;33(8):737-41. doi: 10.1002/pd.4116. Epub 2013 Apr 29. — View Citation

Bauer M, Mazza E, Jabareen M, Sultan L, Bajka M, Lang U, Zimmermann R, Holzapfel GA. Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 May;144 Suppl 1:S77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.025. Epub 2009 Mar 13. — View Citation

Bauer M, Mazza E, Nava A, Zeck W, Eder M, Bajka M, Cacho F, Lang U, Holzapfel GA. In vivo characterization of the mechanics of human uterine cervices. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Apr;1101:186-202. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Review. — View Citation

Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, Rubens C, Menon R, Van Look PF. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jan;88(1):31-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.062554. Epub 2009 Sep 25. Review. — View Citation

Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow AM, Weiner CP. Myometrial thickness during human labor and immediately post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):553-9. — View Citation

Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Norwitz ER, Sfakianaki AK, Hamar B, Copel JA, Saade GR, Weiner CP. Sonographic myometrial thickness predicts the latency interval of women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes and oligohydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 1):762-70. — View Citation

Degani S, Leibovitz Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G. Myometrial thickness in pregnancy: longitudinal sonographic study. J Ultrasound Med. 1998 Oct;17(10):661-5. — View Citation

Deyer TW, Ashton-Miller JA, Van Baren PM, Pearlman MD. Myometrial contractile strain at uteroplacental separation during parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;183(1):156-9. — View Citation

Durnwald CP, Mercer BM. Myometrial thickness according to uterine site, gestational age and prior cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Apr;21(4):247-50. doi: 10.1080/14767050801926709. — View Citation

Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;102(3):488-92. — View Citation

Ginsberg Y, Goldstein I, Lowenstein L, Weiner Z. Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation. J Clin Ultrasound. 2013 May;41(4):214-7. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22023. Epub 2013 Mar 16. — View Citation

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4. Review. — View Citation

Hollenstein M, Bugnard G, Joos R, Kropf S, Villiger P, Mazza E. Towards laparoscopic tissue aspiration. Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec;17(8):1037-45. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 19. — View Citation

Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;172(4 Pt 1):1097-103; discussion 1104-6. — View Citation

Lorenz JM. The outcome of extreme prematurity. Semin Perinatol. 2001 Oct;25(5):348-59. Review. — View Citation

Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel GA. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal. 2006 Apr;10(2):125-36. Epub 2005 Sep 6. — View Citation

Mazza E, Nava A, Hahnloser D, Jochum W, Bajka M. The mechanical response of human liver and its relation to histology: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal. 2007 Dec;11(6):663-72. Epub 2007 Jul 5. — View Citation

Mazza E, Parra-Saavedra M, Bajka M, Gratacos E, Nicolaides K, Deprest J. In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jan;34(1):33-41. Review. — View Citation

Schmidt H, Galbusera F, Rohlmann A, Shirazi-Adl A. What have we learned from finite element model studies of lumbar intervertebral discs in the past four decades? J Biomech. 2013 Sep 27;46(14):2342-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Aug 3. Review. — View Citation

Sokolowski P, Saison F, Giles W, McGrath S, Smith D, Smith J, Smith R. Human uterine wall tension trajectories and the onset of parturition. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 23;5(6):e11037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011037. — View Citation

Wachsberg RH, Kurtz AB, Levine CD, Solomon P, Wapner RJ. Real-time ultrasonographic analysis of the normal postpartum uterus: technique, variability, and measurements. J Ultrasound Med. 1994 Mar;13(3):215-21. — View Citation

* Note: There are 23 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mechanical compliance index of the cervix	The mechanical compliance index of the cervix is the percentage of the cervical tissue above a 1.2 stretch threshold under a uniform IUP. This index is calculated using finite element computational methods, given the maternal anatomy and cervical stiffness measured from the aspiration tool. The mechanical compliance index of the cervix will be measured at both time points within the study timeframe, and the change of the mechanical compliance index between the two time points will be assessed. The main outcome parameter will be the mechanical compliance index at the baseline time point, and the other two outcome measures will be used as validation data points.	Baseline (at diagnosis of short cervix), third trimester (approximately 26-30 weeks)
Secondary	Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth	The investigator will tally the number of women who receive Intervention of Pessary and experience spontaneous preterm birth	Pregnancy duration, an average of up to 40 weeks