Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT01851668 |
| Other study ID # |
12063 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
May 8, 2013 |
| Last updated |
September 11, 2017 |
| Start date |
June 2013 |
| Est. completion date |
September 1, 2017 |
Study information
| Verified date |
January 2017 |
| Source |
University of Nottingham |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This is an observational pilot study to quantify the amount of vibration, noise,
physiological and biochemical instability that premature babies are exposed to during
inter-hospital transport.
Description:
Neonatal intensive care has advanced significantly in recent years resulting in a marked
decrease in mortality, especially in the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (<1000g).
However, we have not observed a parallel improvement in long term outcomes such as
neurological disability as observed with the EPICure and EPICure 2 data.
There is a need to explore new avenues in neonatal care that can reduce the long term
neurodevelopment complications of extremely preterm birth. One area that has received little
attention is that of inter-hospital transfer of these preterm babies. In the UK, like other
countries such as USA and Australia, the centralisation of neonatal intensive care in large
tertiary units (NICU's) has resulted in reduced mortality but not significant morbidity. Data
from Australia suggests there is 4-fold increase in death for those ELBW infants transferred
between tertiary neonatal units within the same city (Melbourne). Furthermore, data from the
USA, where 69,000 neonatal transports occur each year, have demonstrated a significant
increase in severe intraventricular haemorrhages (IVH) in transported infants. Severe IVH is
associated with a poor neurological outcome including cerebral palsy. Many of the ELBW
infants are transferred within a few hours of life in order to receive specialist care and
services. However, it is the first few days of life that represent the greatest risk of
developing an IVH with up to 50% developing IVH before 3 days and if severe 75% could go on
to develop cerebral palsy.
No causation has been identified for the associated significant increase in risk of IVH and
it is likely to be multifactorial. Such factors could include resuscitation at birth and
early care on the NICU. However, in developed countries some of these factors are likely to
be less important with the establishment of neonatal networks (sharing common practice and
guidelines) and international and national guidelines/training programmes for newborn
resuscitation. This raises the actual transfer of the preterm infant which could represent a
significant stress to the infant. Inter-hospital transfer, usually many miles away from the
birth hospital, is at a time during early life when transition from fetus to newborn is still
occurring and there is often cardiorespiratory instability. The combination of these factors
can increase the risk of neurological injury to the immature developing brain, especially
during the period of greatest risk of IVH. Although IVH is easy to identify and define as a
risk to the long term neurodevelopment of the baby there is also the possibility that more
subtle neurological injury can occur. Such injury may not be detectable from ultrasound
imaging alone but may require novel biochemical markers that can be detected in the bodily
fluids (blood, urine) or by more detailed imaging techniques (magnetic resonance imaging -
MRI). A recent study has highlighted this with early markers of stress correlating with poor
neurological predictors, such as regional alterations in brain volume (on MRI) and functional
motor deficits, in ex-preterm infants at term corrected gestation.
As more ELBW infants are reaching school age, there are growing concerns surrounding the
increased in incidence of neurodevelopmental problems in these children. Many predict that
such problems may stem from early life exposure to environmental stressors which could
potentially have adverse effects on the infant's physiological and neurological stability.
The presence of these stressors is very much evident during inter-hospital transportation and
on neonatal units where preterm infants are exposed to noise and mechanical vibration.
On all neonatal units, the characteristic loud noises contributed by alarms, ventilators,
phones and even conversations often exceed the recommended hourly level of 45 decibels on an
A-weighted scale. Excessive noise levels have been shown to increase heart rate in both
preterm and term infants. A maturing biphasic pattern with initial cardiac acceleration and
rebound deceleration has been observed in higher birth weight infants, this which was absent
or milder in ELBW infants. Noise has also been shown to increase blood pressure, increase
respiratory rates, and affect sleep cycles. Decreased autonomic and self-regulatory abilities
make these ELBW infants vulnerable to high noise levels due to their inability to filter and
process noxious stimuli. This could potentially hinder neurodevelopment during such a
critical time.
During inter-hospital transfers, infants are continually exposed to prolonged, low-frequency,
high amplitude mechanical vibration. This mechanical vibration has been shown to exceed the
maximum recommended limit (0.31m/s) for adults. In adult humans and experimental animals this
vibration was found to have adverse effects on the cardiovascular function, the nervous
system, the thermoregulatory functions, metabolic and endocrine function, and
gastrointestinal system. In animal models, short periods of vibration, similar to those
experienced by transported infants, there is a deleterious effect on surfactant and
respiratory function which is again often requiring support in the early part of a preterm
infants life. The implications of vibration may be especially relevant when transporting ELBW
infants as it could compromise the stability and observation of the infant in transport.
Whilst the focus on transport is to ensure the safety of the infant we must also explore
interventions that can increase comfort, reduce physical stress and improve outcomes. No
studies have detailed the combined physical, physiological and biochemical effects of
inter-hospital transfer on these infants and their outcomes. Indeed, many studies have
documented sound exposure and a limited number have documented vibration (albeit of the
transport incubator rather than the baby). None of these studies have addressed this in a
detailed and structured way that will allow us to plan interventional strategies aimed at
reducing these stressors. Until such detailed data is available it is not possible to
undertake trials aimed at reducing the impact of inter-hospital transfer with the aim of
improving outcomes.
The present study will be the first to examine the physical forces the baby is exposed to
during transfer. We will also combine this with measures of physiological stability (i.e.
monitor vital signs and correlate these with physical stressors) as well as measure key
biochemical markers in the newborn. These biochemical markers include cortisol (a well
described marker of short-term stress)32, copeptin (a marker of newborn stress) and s100b
protein in the urine (a marker of neurological injury). Outcome data will also be analysed.
STUDY OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE Hypothesis Inter-hospital transfer of the ELBW infant in the
first days of life will adversely impact on measures of neonatal stress in the short-term.
Aims
The Primary aim is to quantify:
(i) physical stresses experienced by preterm infants during inter-hospital transfer in early
life,
Secondary aims are to quantify:
(ii) the physiological and biochemical disruption caused by transfer, (iii) central nervous
system dynamics using advanced computational modelling to ascertain the potential impact on
brain injury.
STUDY DESIGN This is an observational study that will provide feasibility data for a larger
interventional trial with appropriate sample size.
The study has 3 elements:
Study A. Using infant mannequins we will undertake standard inter-hospital journeys similar
to those currently undertaken by neonatal transport teams. The mannequin will be equipped
with motion detection equipment (accelerometers), positioning devices (GPS) and noise meters.
We will examine a number of interventions aimed at reducing transport associated motion. This
work will allow us to plan future trials aimed at improving transport comfort, safety and
practicality in preterm infants.
Study B. Establish the motion experienced by neonatal patients during current transport
methods. This element of the study will quantify multi-directional forces experienced by
babies during their transfer. Whilst data is available on vibration of the transport
incubator, no study has quantified the actual effects on the baby and the response of key
physiological observations (e.g. heart rate and oxygen saturation). Data from this element
will capture a range of clinical variables such as gestation, weight and level of support.
This data, along with that gathered in Study C, will allow us to develop a computational
model of the physical stresses experienced and design better transport systems.
Study C. To quantify, correlate and assess the physiological and biochemical disturbance
experienced by preterm infants undergoing inter-hospital transfer. Preterm infants undergoing
inter-hospital transfer will be included in this element.
