Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Primary |
PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) |
On the PCL-5 participants first report an autobiographical narrative of a trauma, and subsequently rate how bothered they were by each symptom (0 [not at all] - 4 [extremely]) for all DSM-V PTSD symptoms within the past week. Total score range is 0 to 80, with higher scores reflecting greater symptomatology. Positive change score reflects increase in PTSD symptoms from baseline to post-treatment; negative change score reflects decrease in PTSD symptoms from baseline to post-treatment. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks), and baseline to 3 months post-treatment. |
|
| Primary |
Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR) |
The DAR is a 7-item scale measuring the frequency, duration, and behavioral response to anger, and anger-related functional impairment on social relationships, health, and work. It was found to have concurrent and discriminant validity, and to correlate highly with measures of functional impairment, in a large sample of treatment-seeking soldiers who had served in Iraq or Afghanistan. Score range is from 0-56, with higher score reflecting greater problems with anger. Positive change score reflects increase in anger interference from baseline to post-treatment; negative change score reflects decrease in anger interference from baseline to post-treatment. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks), and baseline to 3 months post-treatment. |
|
| Primary |
The Appetitive Aggression Scale (AAS) |
This scale has two parts. Part 1 is a 17-item scale that asked participants to mark whether they have engaged in or witness specific violent acts. 15 of these items measure acts that could reflect appetitive aggression (".made another person scream in pain"), and two are more clearly reactive ("...defended yourself in a fight"). If a participant endorses having engaged in any of the 15 potentially appetitive aggressive behaviors, then Part 2 is administered. Data from Part 2 is what is presented here. Part 2 is a 19-item scale that evaluates (yes or no) whether the participant enjoys engaging in violence. Only the first 15 items are scored because these reflect appetitive aggression (the last 4 items evaluate reactive aggression). Total score on Part 2 ranges from 0 to 15, with higher score reflecting greater appetitive aggression. Negative change score reflects decreases in appetitive aggression from baseline to post-treatment; positive change scores reflect increases. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks) |
|
| Primary |
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-2) |
The BDI-2 is a 21-item scale that evaluates symptoms of depression. Total score range is from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Negative change scores reflect decrease in depression from pre to post treatment; positive change scores reflect increase in depression from pre to post treatment. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks), and baseline to 3 months post-treatment. |
|
| Secondary |
The Moral Injury Events Scale (MIES) |
The MIES is an 11-item scale that measures moral injury associated with experiences during military service. Statements related to distress or feelings of betrayal related to potentially morally injurious events are rated on a 6 point scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Score range is 11 to 66, with higher scores reflecting greater moral injury. Positive change scores reflect increase in moral injury from pre to post treatment; negative change scores reflect decrease in moral injury from pre to post treatment. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks), and baseline to 3 months post-treatment. |
|
| Secondary |
Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) |
The CTS2 includes 78 items measuring the use of psychological and physical attacks by the participant. Participants answer how often these behaviors were perpetrated by them within a specified time period: 0 (never); 1 (once); 2 (twice); 3 (3-5 times); 4 (6-10 times); 5 (11-20 times); 6 (more than 20 times). The original CTS2 instructions will be modified to more appropriately reflect the goals of this study: 1) the target of the behavior will be expanded from "partner" to "anyone"; and 2) the time frame of the response will be reduced from one year to three months to detect potential changes associated with treatment. Two subscale scores were used for these analyses: Psychological Aggression (range = 0 to 48) and Physical Assault (range = 0 to 72), with higher scores reflecting greater use of aggression. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks), and baseline to 3 months post-treatment. |
|
| Secondary |
Trauma-Related Guilt Index (TRGI) |
Guided by appraisal theories of emotion, the 32-item TRGI is an index of guilt associated with the experience of trauma. Participants rate statements on a 5-point scale ranging from extremely true/extremely guilty (4) to not at all true/not guilty at all (0). Total scores range from 0 to 128, with higher scores reflecting greater trauma-related guilt. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks) |
|
| Secondary |
Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) |
Based upon the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (Joiner Jr et al., 2009), the INQ measures two proximal causes of the desire for suicide: Thwarted belongingness and Perceived burdensomeness. Participants rate each of the 15 items on a scale of 1 (not at all true for me) to 7 (very true for me). Total scores range from 15 to 105, with greater scores reflecting higher levels of suicide-related cognitions. |
Change in total score from baseline to end of treatment (approximately 10-12 weeks), and baseline to 3 months post-treatment. |
|
