View clinical trials related to Postpartum Hemorrhage.
Filter by:Major obstetric haemorrhage (MOH) remains a cause of significant maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. By identifying women with a higher a priori risk of major haemorrhage during their pregnancy or early during postpartum haemorrhage extra measures to prevent MOH can be taken. In this study the investigators aim to identify haemostatic parameters that during the course of haemorrhage are responsible for the on-going towards major bleeding. By doing this, cut-off points can be defined for future interventions aiming to stop this bleeding process in an early stage. Traditional coagulation parameters are currently not useful for clinical decision making, because of long turn around times. Therefore the added value of available coagulation 'point of care' tests will be evaluated during obstetric haemorrhage.These Point-of-Care (POC) tests could lead to a goal-directed haemostatic therapy for obstetric haemorrhage. A cohort of 9.500 pregnant women will be followed during their pregnancy and delivery. From all women a bleeding score will be obtained during their pregnancy by means of a validated questionnaire. The predictive value of this bleeding score for the occurrence of major obstetric haemorrhage will be evaluated. If postpartum haemorrhage develops (blood loss) > 1000 cc, blood samples will be drawn for conventional haemostatic parameters and ROTEM profiles. The pathway between minor bleeding and major bleeding will be elucidated. Interchangeability and comparability of conventional haemostatic parameters and ROTEM profiles will also be evaluated. The overall goal of the investigators is becoming more able to predict major obstetric haemorrhage in an early stage of postpartum haemorrhage and define thresholds for goal-directed hemostatic therapies.
the investigators aim to compare bimanual uterine compression immediately after delivery of the placenta for 5 minutes versus no intervention for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in Women at high risk for primary atonic postpartum hemorrhage. The primary outcome is postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss of ≥ 500 ml) while the Secondary outcomes include use of additional uterotonics and need for blood transfusion.
To assess the impact and to identify the main risk factors for psychological and cardiac morbidity (post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depression) in case of postpartum hemorrhage
The investigators compare the effectiveness and adverse effects of I.V carbetocin versus oxytocin & ergometrine I.V for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following cesarean section.
We aim to compare carbetocin with misoprostol for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with severe preeclampsia. The primary outcome is postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss of ≥ 500 ml) while our Secondary outcomes include use of additional uterotonics, need for blood transfusion, maternal adverse drug reaction, maternal complications and maternal death
The aim of the work is to evaluate & compare the effectiveness of rectally administered PGE1 synthetic analogue (misoprostol) 400 microgram versus sublingually administered misoprostol before caesarean section to decrease blood loss during and after the operation.
Intramuscular versus intravenous prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour following vaginal delivery: A randomised controlled trial
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a common complication of childbirth and a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The prompt and effective treatment of subjects with PPH would reduce operation risks. Hence in this study, the efficacy of Oxytocin and Carbetocin was compared in prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean sections.
The use of Oxytocin, Carbetocin and buccal misoprostol in patients undergoing elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide and is caused most commonly by poor uterine muscle tone after delivery. The first line agent used in the prevention and treatment of PPH is oxytocin, which acts by binding with oxytocin receptors (OTR) found on myometrial cells to cause uterine contraction. Women who require augmentation of labour with oxytocin because of inadequate labour progression are at increased risk of PPH because they have received intravenous oxytocin which exposes the uterus (and OTR) to doses greater than would normally be found without medical intervention. This exposure results in OTR desensitization and decreased uterine sensitivity to oxytocin which may lead to the use of much higher doses of oxytocin (up to 9x) or other agents for preventing and treating PPH with the potential for causing serious drug-related morbidity or fatality to the mother. Currently, in women who have failed labour augmentation and need to have a Cesarean delivery, it is not known if it would be beneficial to wait a certain period of time after discontinuing intravenous oxytocin before proceeding with the operation. The goal of the waiting time would be to allow the OTRs to recover and resensitize the uterus to the effects of oxytocin to avoid the need for high doses or additional uterus-contracting agents. Our hypothesis is that there will be a positive correlation between the magnitude of recovery of the myometrium's response to oxytocin and the time elapsed from the desensitizing oxytocin pretreatment (simulated labour augmentation).