Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04145791
Other study ID # 072018-055
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 15, 2019
Est. completion date February 3, 2021

Study information

Verified date February 2021
Source University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the proposed study is to investigate the effectiveness of cryotherapy as an additional form of pain control in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions through a randomized trial.


Description:

The purpose of the proposed study is to investigate the effectiveness of cryotherapy as an additional form of pain control in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions through a randomized trial. The following aims will be pursued: Primary Aim: To determine if cryotherapy patients will have lower pain scores on VAS compared to standard pain management patients. Primary Hypothesis: Patients receiving cryotherapy will have lower VAS scores compared to patients receiving pain management. Secondary Aim 1: To determine if cryotherapy will reduce the number of morphine milligram equivalent (MME) compared to patients with standard pain management. Secondary Hypothesis 1: Patients receiving cryotherapy will have lower MME values compared to patients with standard pain management. Secondary Aim 2: To determine if cryotherapy will result in earlier return to baseline activity as measured by Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR). Secondary Hypothesis 2: Patients receiving cryotherapy will return to baseline activity level sooner than those receiving standard pain management. Secondary Aim 3: To determine if cryotherapy will result in a faster time to discharge as determined by duration between admission to postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and discharge home. Secondary Hypothesis 3: Patient receiving cryotherapy will be have a shorter stay in PACU.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 74
Est. completion date February 3, 2021
Est. primary completion date February 3, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications within 8 weeks of enrollment - Women >18 years of age - Non-emergent surgery - Non-pregnant - Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with the minimally invasive surgery team Exclusion Criteria: - Requires surgery for urinary incontinence - Has acute angle glaucoma - Has severe cardiac/respiratory disease - Current chronic pain condition (ie chronic pelvic pain, fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain) - Chronic use/abuse of opioid medications for greater than 1 week preceding procedure - Chronic NSAID use - Current treatment of opioid dependence with methadone or buprenorphine - Non-English or Non-Spanish speaking - Procedure converted to laparotomy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Ice
ice packs

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Clements University Hospital Dallas Texas
United States Parkland Health and Hospital System Dallas Texas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain score of cryotherapy patients as compared to non-cryotherapy patients To determine if cryotherapy patients will have lower pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) compared to standard pain management patients at the time of same day discharge. VAS requires that patients mark their level pain along a straight 100mm line. There are no number markings on the scale. The beginning of the line is labeled on the left as "no pain" and the end of the line on the right is labeled as "worst pain imaginable." Once marked by the patient, the distance from beginning of the line to the patient's hash mark is measured in millimeters and that value is recorded as the pain level. The minimum is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 100 (worst pain imaginable). pain score collected at admission to the preoperative holding unit prior to surgery
Primary Pain score of cryotherapy patients as compared to non-cryotherapy patients To determine if cryotherapy patients will have lower pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) compared to standard pain management patients at the time of same day discharge. VAS requires that patients mark their level pain along a straight 100mm line. There are no number markings on the scale. The beginning of the line is labeled on the left as "no pain" and the end of the line on the right is labeled as "worst pain imaginable." Once marked by the patient, the distance from beginning of the line to the patient's hash mark is measured in millimeters and that value is recorded as the pain level. The minimum is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 100 (worst pain imaginable). pain score collected immediately after surgery
Primary Pain score of cryotherapy patients as compared to non-cryotherapy patients To determine if cryotherapy patients will have lower pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) compared to standard pain management patients at the time of same day discharge. VAS requires that patients mark their level pain along a straight 100mm line. There are no number markings on the scale. The beginning of the line is labeled on the left as "no pain" and the end of the line on the right is labeled as "worst pain imaginable." Once marked by the patient, the distance from beginning of the line to the patient's hash mark is measured in millimeters and that value is recorded as the pain level. The minimum is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 100 (worst pain imaginable). pain score collected post operative day 1
Primary Pain score of cryotherapy patients as compared to non-cryotherapy patients To determine if cryotherapy patients will have lower pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) compared to standard pain management patients at the time of same day discharge. VAS requires that patients mark their level pain along a straight 100mm line. There are no number markings on the scale. The beginning of the line is labeled on the left as "no pain" and the end of the line on the right is labeled as "worst pain imaginable." Once marked by the patient, the distance from beginning of the line to the patient's hash mark is measured in millimeters and that value is recorded as the pain level. The minimum is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 100 (worst pain imaginable). pain score collected at two weeks post operative.
Secondary Narcotic usage Amount of narcotic pain medicines used as measured in morphine milligram equivalent (MME). postoperative day one
Secondary Quality of Recovery (QoR) Return to baseline activity as measured by QoR questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 15 items, 10 in Part A and 5 in Part B. Part A assesses patients daily functioning and utilizes a Likert scale 0 to 10, where 0 = none of the time [poor] and 10 = all of the time [excellent]. Park B asses symptomatology and utilizes a Likert scale (0 to 10, where 10 = none of the time [excellent] and 0 = all of the time [poor]. through study completion to take place at preoperative visit, and post operative day #14.
Secondary Time to discharge Duration of time in minutes between admission to postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and discharge home as recorded in the electronic health record. day of surgery, up to 1440 minutes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04633850 - Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
Recruiting NCT03181620 - Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation N/A
Completed NCT04579354 - Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT06007378 - Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05943015 - Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum, Paravertebral Blocks N/A
Completed NCT04544228 - Ketamine or Neostigmine for Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy N/A
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT03663478 - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section Phase 4
Completed NCT04176822 - Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period N/A
Completed NCT05170477 - Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment N/A
Completed NCT06425601 - A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04561856 - Fascia Iliaca Block Supplemented With Perineural Vs Intravenous Dexamethasone Phase 4
Completed NCT03612947 - TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Phase 2
Completed NCT05974501 - Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Phase 4
Completed NCT05995912 - Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib-tramadol Tablet in Acute Postoperative Pain Phase 2
Completed NCT04571515 - Dose-Response Study of MR-107A-01 in The Treatment of Post-Surgical Dental Pain Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04190355 - The Effect of Irrigant Types Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05145153 - Incidence of Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery
Recruiting NCT03697278 - Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) N/A