A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (Fentanyl-ITS) in the Management of Post-Surgery Pain

Postoperative Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Global Assessment of Treatment With IONSYS and Its Handling by Patients, Doctors and Nursing Staff in the Management of Acute Moderate to Severe Post-Surgery Pain in Hospitalised Patients

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01804673
• Other study ID #: CR005440
• Secondary ID: FEN-PAI-30022005
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: Phase 4
• First received: March 4, 2013
• Last updated: August 2, 2013
• Start date: March 2008
• Est. completion date: September 2008

Study information

• Verified date: August 2013
• Source: Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Germany: Ethics Commission
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal (through the skin) system (fentanyl-ITS) in daily clinical practice for management of acute (a quick and severe form of illness in its early stage) moderate to severe post-operative pain (pain after surgery) including the comprehensibility and usefulness of the accompanying information material.

Description:

This is an open label (all people know the identity of the intervention), single arm, and multi-center (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the fentanyl-ITS for management of acute moderate to severe pain in post-operative participants' who have undergone elective surgery (surgery which could be postponed or not done at all without danger to the participant). The study will consists of 2 phases: screening phase (which comprises of pre-operative and post-operative stages) and an open label treatment phase. The participants will be treated with 40 microgram (mcg) of fentanyl transdermally per on-demand dose; each delivered over 10 minutes for a maximum of 6 doses (240 mcg) per hour for 24 hours and a maximum of 80 doses (3.2 milligram [mg]). Each system will inactivate at 80 doses or 24 hour, whichever occurs first. A new system will be applied every 24 hours unless the participant has used 80 doses in less than 24 hours. Maximum treatment duration of 72 hours is allowed. Participants will be expected to require parenteral (administration by injection) opioids (morphine like medications) for at least 24 hours post-operatively. This study will evaluate participant's, nurse's and physician's assessment of fentanyl-ITS under routine conditions. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 174
• Est. completion date: September 2008
• Est. primary completion date: September 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Participants with American Society of Anesthesiology (specialty concerned with the study of anesthetics [drug that is used to produce loss of pain sensation] and anesthesia [loss of sensation or feeling]) pre-operative physical status 1, 2 or 3

• Participants who are expected to remain hospitalized for at least 24 hours post-operatively (after the surgery)

• Participants, after an elective major surgical procedure (surgery which could be postponed or not done at all without danger to the participant), who are expected to have moderate or severe pain requiring parenteral (administration by injection) opioids (morphine like medications) for at least 24 hours after surgery

• Participants who are capable of understanding and cooperating with the requirements of the study and operating a transdermal (through the skin) Patients-Controlled Analgesia (PCA; methods of pain relief that may be used with or in place of analgesics [drug used to control pain])

• Participants with a pain score less than or equal to 4 (moderate pain) out of 10 on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), whereas 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 to the strongest imaginable pain at movement of the operated limb or body region, after titration (slow increase in drug dosage, guided by participant's responses) to comfort according to current postoperative procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants allergic or hypersensitive (very sensitive) to fentanyl or cetylpyridinium chloride or to skin adhesives

• Participants who are known or suspected to be strong opioid dependent, or who have a very high a need for strong opioids before entering the study

• Participants with a history of psychological opioid dependence before the start of the study

• Participants who are known or suspected to have abused any drug substance or alcohol in the opinion of the investigator

• Women who are pregnant, breast feeding, or planning to breast feed within 24 hrs of the last dose of study drug.

Study Design

Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain, Postoperative
• Postoperative Pain

Intervention

Drug:
• Fentanyl-ITS
Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal (through the skin) System (ITS) will release fentanyl at the rate of 40 microgram (mcg) (1 dose) to maximum of 240 mcg per hour (6 doses) but not more than 3.2 milligram (mg) (80 doses) per 24 hours. The duration of study treatment will be 72 hours.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 24	Participants were asked to rate their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment on a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.	Hour 24	No
Secondary	Number of Hours Per Day With Average Pain Intensity Less Than or Equal to 4	Number of hours per day with average pain intensity less than or equal to 4 was measured on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10, 0=no pain; 4=mild pain; 10=strongest pain imaginable). If the participant was sleeping at time of measurement, pain intensity was assumed to be less than or equal to 4.	Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Hour 24, 48 and 72	Nursing staff asked the participants to rate their current pain intensity on 11-point NRS (range 0 to 10, 0= no pain; 10= strongest pain imaginable).	Baseline, Hour 24, 48 and 72	No
Secondary	Time Spent Out of the Bed Per Day by the Participant	Participants were asked to enter the time in hours spend out of bed during the last 24 hours in the participant diary.	Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72	No
Secondary	Time to Mobilization	Participants were asked to describe their time schedule for particular steps of mobilization by answering specific questions in the participant diary.	Baseline, Hours 24, 48 and 72	No
Secondary	Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 48 and 72	Participants were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.	Hours 48 and 72	No
Secondary	Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment of Pain	Physicians were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.	Hours 24, 48 and 72	No
Secondary	Percentage of Participants With Nursing Staff Global Assessment of Pain	Nursing Staff were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.	Hours 24, 48 and 72	No
Secondary	Physician's Evaluation of Participant's Ability to Undergo Physiotherapy or Mobilization	Physicians were asked to rate the participant's ability to undergo physiotherapy or mobilization by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: Part 1 A- Does the surgical procedure performed allow the mobilization of the participant, C- Was the mobilization of the participant limited due to pain, D- Is the participant in a condition to undergo physiotherapy; Part 2 A- Was it possible to mobilize the participant sooner than with other pain therapies, B- Does the participant move more, C- Is the participant less afraid of moving. For Part 1-Question C, 'Partial' indicates that mobilization of participant was moderately limited due to pain.	Hours 24, 48 and 72	No
Secondary	Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Physician Questionnaire Responses	Physicians were asked to evaluate the IM for fentanyl-ITS (IONSYS) by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: Part2 D- Would you use IONSYS again, E- Would you prefer IONSYS to intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA); Part3 A- Was IM easy to understand, B- Did IM help you to use system properly.	Hour 72	No
Secondary	Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Nursing Staff Questionnaire Responses	Nursing staff were asked to evaluate the IM for IONSYS by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: IM A- Was IM easy to understand, B- Did IM help you to use system properly; IONSYS PCA A- Is system easy to handle, B- Did participant need help in using system, C- Do you feel confident using IONSYS; IV PCA- Are you experienced in using IV PCA; IONSYS PCA D- Could participant get mobilized sooner, E- Does participant move more, F- Is participant less afraid of moving, G- Were hospital logistics for IONSYS easier to handle.	Hour 72	No
Secondary	Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Participant Questionnaire Responses	Participants were asked to evaluate the IM for IONSYS by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: A- Is IONSYS easy to use, B- Were you able to operate the system by yourself after receiving instructions, C- Have you found button yourself, D- Was pressing button easy, E- Have you heard system's beeps, F- Was IONSYS IM easy to understand, G- Did IM help you to use system, H- Did you have problems falling asleep, I- Could you move easily in bed, J- Did system bother you during physiotherapy, K- Do you perceive use of such system as modern treatment standard.	Hour 72	No
Secondary	Post-Operative Phase (PPP33) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score	The PPP33 questionnaire has an overall score and 8 subscales that represent different aspects of the post-operative quality of life: information, autonomy, communication, physical complaints, pain, rest, fear and accommodation. Answers to individual question are scored with values 1 to 4. Summary scores are calculated by adding values for each question. Subscores ranges depend on the number of questions evaluated (2 to 7 questions). The overall score ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores indicate less pain.	Hour 72	No