Continence and Potency Following Multi-Layer Perinatal Issue alloGraft

Post Operative Recovery Clinical Trial

Official title:

Radical Prostectomy (RAP): Prospective Trial Evaluating Return to Continence and Potency Following Radical Prostatectomy Using Novel Multi-Layer Perinatal Issue alloGraft

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05081232
• Other study ID #: IRB00076844
• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2024
• Est. completion date: August 2024

Study information

• Verified date: August 2022
• Source: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this research is to determine the effectiveness of using human Umbilical Cord (UC) allograft to help improve return to erectile function and bladder control in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Description:

Participation in this study will involve MLG (Multi-Layered Perinatal Tissue Allograft) allograft, which is implanted during the surgery. This allograft is currently FDA approved and used for several type of surgeries. The Multi-Layered Perinatal Tissue Allograft- (MLG) is processed from tissue according to the American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB) standards, and is regulated as a cell, tissue, or cellular or tissue-based product (HCT/P) under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act. The grafts are distributed by Samaritan Biologics, LLC; an FDA-registered tissue bank. The MLG allograft will be placed on each neurovascular bundle (NVB) bilaterally. MLG is supplied as sterile sheets having dimensions of 2cm x 2cm and a thickness of approximately 0.8-1.0mm thick. Participants receiving MLG will have it placed around the neurovascular bundle. Placement of the graft should not take over 5 minutes of time to impact overall surgical time length significantly.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Withdrawn
• Enrollment: 0
• Est. completion date: August 2024
• Est. primary completion date: August 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 30 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male subjects with at least age of 30 to 65

2. Primary diagnosis of prostate cancer selected for surgical intervention (Radical Prostatectomy)

3. Primary diagnosis of organ confined untreated prostate cancer

4. Planned elective radical prostatectomy with bilateral nerve sparing technique

5. Negative urinalysis within 30 days prior to date of surgery

6. Patient has no erectile dysfunction (SHIM Score < 14 ) prior to date of surgery

7. Patient has the willingness to comply with instruction of the investigator

8. Patient has the willingness to comply with follow-up surveys

9. Have ability to provide full written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. High-risk cancer planned for neoadjuvant therapy, full or partial excision of neurovascular bundles

2. Is unable to comply with learning and documenting penile rehabilitation, including oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitor use, vacuum pump therapy use, and/or injectable medications

3. Patients with a history of more than two weeks treatment with immuno-suppressants (including systemic corticosteroids), cytotoxic chemotherapy within one month prior to initial screening, or who receive such medications during the screening period, or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study

4. Patients that have had prior hormonal therapy such as Lupron or oral anti-androgens

5. Patients with poor urinary control at baseline requiring the use of pads for leakage

6. Previous history of pelvic radiation

7. Previous history of simple prostatectomy or transurethral prostate surgery

8. Patients with obesity defined as BMI > 40 kg/m2

9. History of open pelvic surgery within 5 years except for hernia repair

10. Poorly controlled diabetes (A1C >8.5%)

11. Scheduled at the time of screening to undergo chemotherapy, radiation, hormone therapy, or open surgery during the study period

12. Any neurologic disorder or psychiatric disorder that might confound postsurgical assessments

13. Has any condition(s), which seriously compromises the subject's ability to participate in this study, sign consent, or has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment

14. In the opinion of the PI, has a history of drug or alcohol abuse within last 12 months

15. Is allergic to Aminoglycoside antibiotics (such as Gentamicin and/or Streptomycin)

16. Received administration of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to study, and/or has planned administration of another investigational product or procedure during participation in this study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Post Operative Recovery

Intervention

Device:
• MLG (Multi-Layered Perinatal Issue Allograft) Allograft
MLG allografts contains more than 450 bioactive proteins including growth factors and cytokines known to modulate inflammation and promote tissue healing. MLG is supplied as sterile sheets having dimensions of 2cm x 2cm and a thickness of approximately 0.8-1.0mm thick. Participants receiving MLG will have it placed around the neurovascular bundle. Placement of the graft should not take over 5 minutes of time to impact overall surgical time length significantly.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

References & Publications (15)

Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, Boros M, Brune J, Beutner U, Tsaur I, Ramon A, Otto T. Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft to Improve Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence and Potency: A Randomized Exploration Study Protocol. Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):592-602. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01158-3. Epub 2019 Nov 28. — View Citation

Bullard JD, Lei J, Lim JJ, Massee M, Fallon AM, Koob TJ. Evaluation of dehydrated human umbilical cord biological properties for wound care and soft tissue healing. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 May;107(4):1035-1046. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34196. Epub 2018 Sep 10. — View Citation

Carlsson S, Drevin L, Loeb S, Widmark A, Lissbrant IF, Robinson D, Johansson E, Stattin P, Fransson P. Population-based study of long-term functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment. BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6B):E36-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.13179. Epub 2015 Jun 23. — View Citation

Castiglione F, Ralph DJ, Muneer A. Surgical Techniques for Managing Post-prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction. Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 30;18(11):90. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0735-2. — View Citation

Fetterolf DE, Snyder RJ. Scientific and clinical support for the use of dehydrated amniotic membrane in wound management. Wounds. 2012 Oct;24(10):299-307. — View Citation

Finley DS, Osann K, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Hypothermic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: rationale, feasibility, and effect on early continence. Urology. 2009 Apr;73(4):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.085. Epub 2009 Feb 28. — View Citation

Koob TJ, Rennert R, Zabek N, Massee M, Lim JJ, Temenoff JS, Li WW, Gurtner G. Biological properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite graft: implications for chronic wound healing. Int Wound J. 2013 Oct;10(5):493-500. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12140. Epub 2013 Aug 1. — View Citation

Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2291-6, discussion 2296. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181825.54480.eb. — View Citation

Nelson CJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Mulhall JP. Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients' perspective. J Sex Med. 2013 Jun;10(6):1636-43. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12135. Epub 2013 Apr 3. — View Citation

Neumaier MF, Segall CH Junior, Hisano M, Rocha FET, Arap S, Arap MA. Factors affecting urinary continence and sexual potency recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;45(4):703-712. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0704. — View Citation

Ogaya-Pinies G, Palayapalam-Ganapathi H, Rogers T, Hernandez-Cardona E, Rocco B, Coelho RF, Jenson C, Patel VR. Can dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane accelerate the return to potency after a nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? Propensity score-matched analysis. J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0719-8. Epub 2017 Jun 27. — View Citation

Patel VR, Samavedi S, Bates AS, Kumar A, Coelho R, Rocco B, Palmer K. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft Nerve Wrap Around the Prostatic Neurovascular Bundle Accelerates Early Return to Continence and Potency Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):977-980. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 19. — View Citation

Razdan S, Bajpai RR, Razdan S, Sanchez MA. A matched and controlled longitudinal cohort study of dehydrated human amniotic membrane allograft sheet used as a wraparound nerve bundles in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a puissant adjunct for enhanced potency outcomes. J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):475-481. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0873-7. Epub 2018 Sep 12. — View Citation

Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, Lin X, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Mahadevan A, Klein E, Kibel A, Pisters LL, Kuban D, Kaplan I, Wood D, Ciezki J, Shah N, Wei JT. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311. — View Citation

Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J, Dickman PW, Johansson JE, Norlen BJ, Holmberg L; Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 12;347(11):790-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021483. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Average time for return to potency	Early recovery in potency will be measured as + 4 points of total Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score in relation to baseline score. Return to potency will be defined as the ability to achieve an erection sufficient for intercourse more than 50% of the time or at least 50% rigidity post-robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (Tool: SHIM, Q2 > 3)	1 month post-op
Primary	Average time for return to potency	Early recovery in potency will be measured as + 4 points of total SHIM score in relation to baseline score. Return to potency will be defined as the ability to achieve an erection sufficient for intercourse more than 50% of the time or at least 50% rigidity post-RARP (Tool: SHIM, Q2 > 3)	3 month post-op
Primary	Average time for return to potency	Early recovery in potency will be measured as + 4 points of total SHIM score in relation to baseline score. Return to potency will be defined as the ability to achieve an erection sufficient for intercourse more than 50% of the time or at least 50% rigidity post-RARP (Tool: SHIM, Q2 > 3)	6 month post-op
Primary	Average time for return to potency	Early recovery in potency will be measured as + 4 points of total SHIM score in relation to baseline score. Return to potency will be defined as the ability to achieve an erection sufficient for intercourse more than 50% of the time or at least 50% rigidity post-RARP (Tool: SHIM, Q2 > 3)	12 month post-op
Primary	Average time for return to continence	Return to continence will be defined as use of < 1 pad post-RARP	1-2 days post-op
Primary	Average time for return to continence	Return to continence will be defined as use of < 1 pad post-RARP	1 month post-op
Primary	Average time for return to continence	Return to continence will be defined as use of < 1 pad post-RARP	3 month post-op
Primary	Average time for return to continence	Return to continence will be defined as use of < 1 pad post-RARP	6 month post-op
Primary	Average time for return to continence	Return to continence will be defined as use of < 1 pad post-RARP	12 month post-op
Secondary	Expanded prostate cancer index composite-26 (EPIC-26) Score	EPIC-26, contains five symptom domains (urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, sexual, bowel, hormonal), scored from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)	Months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Secondary	Abdominal VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Pain Score	VAS score 0 -10: 0 indicating no abdominal pain to 10 as worst pain	Post-op Days 1 and 2
Secondary	Value analysis for a historical subset of patients who underwent same surgery as sexual health inventory for men (SHIM)-matched controls	Twenty-five patients who underwent bilateral nerve sparing in the past matched by preoperative SHIM to see how they did in comparison to study cohort will be measured as + 4 points of total SHIM score in relation to baseline score. Return to potency will be defined as the ability to achieve an erection sufficient for intercourse more than 50% of the time or at least 50% rigidity post-RARP (Tool: SHIM, Q2 > 3)	Month 1 post-op
Secondary	Costs of prescription	Oral Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5i), Intracavernosal injection, Alprostadil urethral suppository or future surgery (Inflatable penile prosthesis) to be recorded in the historical group of 25 patients. Overall expense will be measured by reviewing history. A market value of medication and treatment will be accounted. Post coverage out of pocket expense will not be reviewed separately.	Month 12 post-op
Secondary	Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores	Overall patient satisfaction Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) - composed of 29 items - the survey contains 19 core questions about critical aspects of patients' hospital experiences (communication with nurses and doctors, the responsiveness of hospital staff, the cleanliness and quietness of the hospital environment, communication about medicines, discharge information, overall rating of hospital, and would they recommend the hospital) - HCAHPS score is accounted as The "top-box" score indicates how often patients selected the most positive response category when asked about their hospital experience. The higher a hospital's "top-box" score, the higher it ranks.	Day 1 post-op