View clinical trials related to Pneumothorax.
Filter by:This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial (pilot study) that aims to determine the incidence of post-operative recurrent pneumothorax within one-year timeframe after video-assisted thoracoscopic blebectomy/bullectomy with either apical pleurectomy or partially absorbable mesh, as well as to assess the efficacy in preventing post-operative recurrence pneumothorax. Patients, aged more than or equal 20-year-old, with the diagnosis of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, who require video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery at Maharaj Nakorn Chiangmai Hospital, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, will be enrolled into this study. The inform consent will be obtained before the enrollment. Patients will be randomized to two groups; Partially absorbable mesh coverage group (intervention group) and Apical pleurectomy group (control group).
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with blebectomy/wedge resection plus pleurodesis is the standard of care for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) or, in certain instances, after the first episode. The chest tube from surgery is typically kept to suction until post-operative day (POD) 2 to allow for scarring of the lung to the chest to prevent recurrence. However, the scarring process takes place over a period of weeks and is there no data to support POD#2 as the best time to remove the chest tube. Also, shorter chest tube duration can lower length of stay, patient discomfort, and hospital cost. The goal of this randomized study is to determine if early removal (POD#1) of chest tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with blebectomy/wedge resection plus chemical pleurodesis for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP): - has no worse 2-year recurrence rate compared to standard removal (POD#2) - will lower length of stay compared to standard removal - will result in less complications or re-interventions compared to standard removal Participants will be asked to join prior to surgery. Following standard-of-care surgery, participants will be screened for randomization. If still eligible, participants will be randomized for early chest tube removal or standard removal. Early Removal will happen within 24 hours after surgery, with Standard Removal happening day 2 after surgery. Participants will follow-up with the study team for 2 years on the following schedule: - In clinic with a chest x-ray 2 weeks after surgery - By phone 3 months after surgery - In clinic with a chest x-ray 1 year after surgery - In clinic with a chest x-ray 2 years after surgery
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects 3.5 million people and is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Emphysema involves air retention in the lungs and is ultimately responsible for a major deterioration in the quality of life. Available drug treatments have moderate efficacy whereas surgical lung volume reduction can improve exercise capacity when offered to a very selected population but at the cost of significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic Lung Volume reduction with ZEPHYR® valves improves respiratory function at rest, exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with little or no interlobar collateral ventilation. If this technique has therefore proven its effectiveness, it is not devoid of complications and is notably responsible for pneumothorax in 27% of cases. The management of this complication is clearly codified, ranging from patient monitoring to the removal of one or more valves. It is therefore a subject of major concern for multiple reasons: high incidence, lengthening of hospital stay, increase in the overall cost of care, potential loss of benefit for the patient in the event of permanent withdrawal. valves and above all a potentially fatal event. A new strategy for implanting ZEPHYR® valves in two stages has been developed in Limoges University Hospital. This innovative algorithm has been evaluated in several non-comparative single or multicenter studies. In those studies, pneumothorax' rate secondary to lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves is rated between 4.5 and 12%. The efficacy of the treatment appears to be comparable with the data found in the trials evaluating in which the entire lobe was treated in one procedure. Moreover, despite two procedures, there does not seem to be any increased risk of occurrence of other complications. Finally, the systematic scheduling of a thoracic computed tomography between the two procedures showed that 26.6% of patients presented a reduction in volume greater than 350mL despite incomplete treatment. These data seem promising but no direct comparison with standard one-step treatment has ever been conducted so far.
Pneumothorax is characterized by an abnormal presence of air in the pleural cavity, that is to say between the two layers of the pleura, the membrane that surrounds the lungs and lines the rib cage. "The patient is usually seized with sudden chest pain and difficulty in breathing. In this retrospective research, the investigators wish to carry out an inventory of the management of spontaneous pneumothorax in adolescents within the University Hospitals of Strasbourg
The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of nitric oxide on pulmonary vasculature and right ventricular function in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
The purpose of this study is to show that treatment with prophylactic autologous blood patch (ABP) after management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is feasible, reduces the incidence of prolonged air leaks, and reduces hospital length of stay. An ABP is a medical procedure that uses one's own blood in order to close one or many holes identified in the lungs. The blood modulates the pressure of the lungs and forms a clot, sealing the leak. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax is an abnormal collection of air in the pleural space between the lung and the chest wall.
Guidelines lack high quality evidence on optimal postoperative chest tube and pain management after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). This results in great variability in postoperative care and length of hospital stay (LOS). Chest tube and pain management are prominent factors regarding enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery, and in standardised care they are crucial to improve quality of recovery and decrease LOS. Historically, postoperative chest tubes are left in place for at least a fixed number of 3-5 days, irrespective of absence of air leakage. This period was deemed necessary for adequate pleurodesis and prevention of recurrence. However, it is suggested that removal on the same day of surgery is safe and associated with a reduced LOS. Regarding postoperative pain management, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the gold standard for postoperative pain management following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Although the analgesic effect of TEA is clear, it is associated with hypotension and urinary retention. Therefore, unilateral regional techniques, such as paravertebral blockade (PVB), are developed. The investigators hypothesize that early chest tube removal accompanied by a single-shot paravertebral blockade (PVB) for analgesia is safe regarding pneumothorax recurrence and non-inferior regarding pain, but superior regarding LOS when compared to standard conservative treatment.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center annually provides assistance to approximately 600 cardiac surgeries and 1500 trauma patients, many of whom require chest tubes to prevent blood and fluids from accumulating in the pleural cavities surrounding the heart. During the removal of chest tubes, there is a risk of air leaking into these cavities, leading to pneumothorax, a critical condition occurring in approximately 5-26% of cases, associated with increased complications and mortality. Currently, the diagnosis of pneumothorax is primarily based on chest X-rays (CXR), despite their limitations and low reliability. As an alternative method, lung ultrasound (LUS) offers several advantages: it is safer, less expensive, and less painful for patients compared to CXR. However, there is a lack of comparative data on the accuracy and interrater reliability of these two diagnostic approaches after chest tube removal. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of lung ultrasound performed by medical trainees in diagnosing pneumothorax in cardiac and trauma patients. By comparing LUS to CXR, the investigators seek to determine if LUS provides a more reliable and precise diagnosis. This study has the potential to enhance patient care by establishing a more effective and accessible method for diagnosing pneumothorax post-chest tube removal.
The PROSPECT study aims to look at the number of problems or side effects which occur after patients have had a procedure completed to remove fluid or air from the space between the lung and the chest wall. Other information will also be collected to see whether anything else affects which patients have problems after the procedure such as bleeding or infection. This study will also investigate whether it is possible to find out which patients are likely to feel a lot better after the procedure. Not all patients feel significantly better but it is not clear why this is. There are a number of different reasons patients may not feel better, for example if the lung is not able to fully re-expand. The study aims to look at whether it is possible to predict these problems before the procedure using ultrasound. If it is possible to find the answers to some of these questions it might be possible to prevent patients undergoing treatments which are not likely to benefit them. The study will use information already collected as part of clinical care, as well as questionnaires from patients receiving care at a variety of centres. The different features of these centres will also be considered in analysis.
This study will compare the effect of HFNC versus standard oxygen administration after elective esophagectomy for cancer.