Pleural Effusion, Malignant Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicentre Randomised Study Comparing Indwelling Pleural Catheter With Talc Pleurodesis in Patients With a Malignant Pleural Effusion
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) accounts for 50% of all pleural effusions and affects about 300,000 patients annually (UK and USA). Lung and breast cancers account for majority of malignant pleural effusions; 1 in 3 breast cancer, 1 in 4 lung cancer as well as > 90% of patients with mesothelioma develop pleural effusions. Breathlessness from MPE is disabling and impairs quality of life. Median survival ranges between 4-6 months. Although thoracentesis provides effective symptom relief, most effusions recur and pleurodesis is the standard of care. Pleurodesis can be performed via chest tube or applied during pleuroscopy, and talc is the most effective agent. For successful pleurodesis to occur the underlying lung must expand after fluid drainage and trapped lung due to metastatic disease occurs up to 30%. Symptomatic patients require hospitalization for these procedures which are likely to fail if trapped lungs are encountered, and pose significant burden to health services. Tunneled indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is emerging as a viable alternative which provides access to the pleural space for fluid drainage when breathlessness arise. IPC can be performed at ambulatory setting without hospital admission. Case series have demonstrated long-term safety of IPC even in patients undergoing chemotherapy with acceptable complication rates. By keeping the pleural cavity free of fluid, IPC has led to spontaneous pleurodesis in 50% of patients, which allows its removal. Presently IPC is indicated for trapped lung or when talc pleurodesis has failed. A randomised comparative trial with talc pleurodesis is necessary to determine role of IPC as first-line therapy of MPE, if IPC leads to reduction in hospitalizations, adverse events and healthcare costs, and if it improves quality of life. The multicenter trial randomizes symptomatic patients 1:1 to IPC or talc pleurodesis, and endpoints include hospitalization days till death or end of study, adverse events, quality of life, and healthcare costs.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 160 |
Est. completion date | May 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 19 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Symptomatic malignant pleural effusion requiring intervention Exclusion Criteria: - <18 years of age - pregnant or lactating patients - expected survival <3 months - chylothorax - previous attempted pleurodesis - pleural infection - leukocytopaenia (<1.0 x 10^9/L) - uncorrectable bleeding diathesis - inability to give informed consent or comply with the protocol |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Singapore | Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National University Hospital | Singapore |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National University Hospital, Singapore |
Singapore,
Burrows CM, Mathews WC, Colt HG. Predicting survival in patients with recurrent symptomatic malignant pleural effusions: an assessment of the prognostic values of physiologic, morphologic, and quality of life measures of extent of disease. Chest. 2000 Jan;117(1):73-8. — View Citation
Davies HE, Lee YC, Davies RJ. Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: talc, toxicity and where next? Thorax. 2008 Jul;63(7):572-4. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.092940. — View Citation
Davies HE, Lee YCG. Pleurodesis. In: Light RW, Lee YCG, eds. Textbook of Pleural Diseases. 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Arnold Press; 2008:569-82.
Dresler CM, Olak J, Herndon JE 2nd, Richards WG, Scalzetti E, Fleishman SB, Kernstine KH, Demmy T, Jablons DM, Kohman L, Daniel TM, Haasler GB, Sugarbaker DJ; Cooperative Groups Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; North Central Cooperative Oncology Group; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 2005 Mar;127(3):909-15. — View Citation
Heffner JE, Nietert PJ, Barbieri C. Pleural fluid pH as a predictor of survival for patients with malignant pleural effusions. Chest. 2000 Jan;117(1):79-86. — View Citation
Janes SM, Rahman NM, Davies RJ, Lee YC. Catheter-tract metastases associated with chronic indwelling pleural catheters. Chest. 2007 Apr;131(4):1232-4. — View Citation
Lee YC, Fysh ET. Indwelling pleural catheter: changing the paradigm of malignant effusion management. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Apr;6(4):655-7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182114aa0. — View Citation
Lee YC, Wilkosz S. Malignant pleural effusions: fixing the leaky faucet. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul 1;178(1):3-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200804-616ED. — View Citation
Mishra E, Davies HE, Lee YCG. Malignant pleural disease in primary lung cancer. In: Spiro SG, Janes SM, Huber RM, eds. Thoracic Malignancies. 3rd ed ed. Sheffield, U.K.: European Respiratory Society Journals Ltd; 2009:318-35.
Morel A, Mishra E, Medley L, Rahman NM, Wrightson J, Talbot D, Davies RJ. Chemotherapy should not be withheld from patients with an indwelling pleural catheter for malignant pleural effusion. Thorax. 2011 May;66(5):448-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.133504. Epub 2010 Sep 29. — View Citation
Putnam JB Jr, Light RW, Rodriguez RM, Ponn R, Olak J, Pollak JS, Lee RB, Payne DK, Graeber G, Kovitz KL. A randomized comparison of indwelling pleural catheter and doxycycline pleurodesis in the management of malignant pleural effusions. Cancer. 1999 Nov 15;86(10):1992-9. — View Citation
Putnam JB Jr, Walsh GL, Swisher SG, Roth JA, Suell DM, Vaporciyan AA, Smythe WR, Merriman KW, DeFord LL. Outpatient management of malignant pleural effusion by a chronic indwelling pleural catheter. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Feb;69(2):369-75. — View Citation
Robinson BW, Musk AW, Lake RA. Malignant mesothelioma. Lancet. 2005 Jul 30-Aug 5;366(9483):397-408. Review. — View Citation
Suzuki K, Servais EL, Rizk NP, Solomon SB, Sima CS, Park BJ, Kachala SS, Zlobinsky M, Rusch VW, Adusumilli PS. Palliation and pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion: the role for tunneled pleural catheters. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Apr;6(4):762-7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820d614f. — View Citation
Tremblay A, Mason C, Michaud G. Use of tunnelled catheters for malignant pleural effusions in patients fit for pleurodesis. Eur Respir J. 2007 Oct;30(4):759-62. Epub 2007 Jun 13. — View Citation
van den Toorn LM, Schaap E, Surmont VF, Pouw EM, van der Rijt KC, van Klaveren RJ. Management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions with a chronic indwelling pleural catheter. Lung Cancer. 2005 Oct;50(1):123-7. — View Citation
Van Meter ME, McKee KY, Kohlwes RJ. Efficacy and safety of tunneled pleural catheters in adults with malignant pleural effusions: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan;26(1):70-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1472-0. Epub 2010 Aug 10. Review. — View Citation
West SD, Lee YC. Management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clin Chest Med. 2006 Jun;27(2):335-54. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 18 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of hospital days for all causes following intervention | Up to 1 year | No | |
Secondary | Number of hospital days computed for pleural effusion related cause | Up to 1 year | No | |
Secondary | Number of adverse events | Up to 1 year | Yes | |
Secondary | Breathlessness score | Up to 1 year | No | |
Secondary | Self-reported quality of life scores | Up to 1 year | No | |
Secondary | Health costs computation | Up to 1 year | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05693727 -
Cancer Ratio,Pleural Fluid Adenosine Deaminase,Lactate Dehydrogenase, interferonY, Tumor Necrosis Factor,and Interleukins{2,12,18}for Differentiation Between Malignant and Non Malignant Pleural Effusion
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05910112 -
Prospective Data Collection on Clinical, Radiological and Patient Reported Outcomes After Pleural Intervention
|
||
Completed |
NCT03270215 -
The Added Value of CT Scanning in Patients With an Unilateral Pleural Effusion
|
||
Completed |
NCT03272997 -
The Value of PET-CT in Pleural Effusions
|
||
Completed |
NCT00099541 -
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Registry
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04844827 -
Pleural Carcinomatosis Tissue Banking
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06436807 -
PMCF Study of the CE-marked Drainova® ArgentiC Catheter
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05278975 -
Study of RSO-021 in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion Due to Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors Including Mesothelioma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02407912 -
Cisplatin for Malignant Pleural Effusion in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00316134 -
Multiple Biomarkers in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06275178 -
Medical Thoracoscopy for Diagnosing Unexplained Pleural Effusion: a National Multicenter Retrospective Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04684459 -
Dual-targeting HER2 and PD-L1 CAR-T for Cancers With Pleural or Peritoneal Metastasis
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04670562 -
Longitudinal Follow up of Patients With Pleural Effusion
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02805062 -
Manometry vs Clinical Assessment in the Detection of Trapped Lung in Patients With Suspected Pleural Malignancy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03276715 -
Prognostic Factors on Malignant Pleural Effusion
|
||
Completed |
NCT03394105 -
Intrapleural Docetaxel Administration Using Medical Pleuroscopy in Malignant Effusion With Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05461430 -
Mass Response of Tumor Cells as a Biomarker for Rapid Therapy Guidance (TraveraRTGx)
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02702700 -
Photo-induction as a Means to Improve Cisplatin Delivery to Pleural Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01670786 -
Safety Profile of Iodopovidone as an Agent for Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05077111 -
A Comparative Study Between Regional Anesthesia in Thoracoscopes and the Conventional General Anesthesia
|
Phase 4 |