View clinical trials related to Plantar Fascitis.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the changes of heel pain, functional health and well-being after high-intensity and low-level laser therapy for plantar fasciitis or Achilles tendinopathy
Study goals are to determine if a novel post-surgical foot offloading device can reduce post-operative pain and expedite the return to daily activity following fat grafting. Investigators will perform a prospective, randomized study utilizing PopSole™, a novel fully customizable post-operative shoe insert, to aid in the recovery of patients post-surgical fat graft injections for pain and limited activity due to foot disorders (ie. fat pad atrophy of the forefoot, heel, or for chronic plantar fasciitis). Standard of care fat grafting is often used in plastic surgery for cosmetic or reconstructive reasons. Foot fat grafting, though not considered part of this research trial, is routinely offered in the UPMC Aesthetic Plastic Surgery center as a cosmetic surgery option; however, treatment modality options following the completion of a foot fat grafting procedure to protect the fat grafts and reduce weight bearing on the fresh fat grafts are limited. Current standard of care options including crutches, scooters, bulky post-operative shoes (ie. Darco shoes [Darco Intl. Huntington WV.]), and the addition of padding to insoles or orthotics that attempt to offload the treated area. Most of these devices are flat and provide poor anatomical support, leading to compensatory gait issues which can lead to further problems and pain in the knees, hips, and back. The most common complication with post-operative foot gear is non-compliance: patients do not wear it. The investigators have devised a novel foot offloading device (PopSole™) which will allow for customization of the area where the fat has been injected into the foot, as well as allow for customizable arch support and elevation of the metatarsals. By randomizing patients to recovery with standard methods versus this new device, the investigators are hopeful for earlier patient ambulation and return to work with decreased pain.
Plantar fasciitis is a common pathology among podiatry moreover the healing time takes several months. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) versus corticosteroid injection.
Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain and it is diagnosed by clinically. Resting, stretching exercises, weight loss, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physical therapy methods are used in the treatment. Steroid injection can be applied in patients who do not respond to these treatments. But steroid injection is not a pathology-based treatment, and also can cause serious side effects, such as fat pad atrophy and plantar fascia rupture. At this stage, in patients who do not respond to conservative treatments, new methods such as dextrose prolotherapy and platelet rich plasma may be used instead of steroid injection. In the literature, there is insufficient study showing effect of prolotherapy in patients with plantar fasciitis. Because these studies enrolled small number of patients and lacked controlled design. The investigators design a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to assess the effect after prolotherapy injection in patients with plantar fasciitis. The participants evaluated with clinically and sonographically. The aim of this study is to compare the pain, function and thickness of proximal plantar fascia in prolotherapy or control group.
Many patients suffer from chronic heel pain, and studies have not yet found the most appropriate treatment. There are some researchers who claim that the pain is caused by weakness in the muscles of the foot, which causes increased pressure in the heel. In walking, the muscles of the foot are activated and strengthened. No research has yet been done on whether walking (barefoot or with shoes) on a treadmill reduces pain in the heel and improves function.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT), sham- rESWT or standardised exercise program is more effective on change in heel pain than usual care in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy. The null hypothesis is: There is no difference between rESWT, sham- rESWT or standardised exercise program on change in heel pain (primary outcome) and functioning (secondary outcomes) compared to usual care in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy at 6 months follow-up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up). Alternative hypothesis is: H1: There is a difference between rESWT and usual care on change in heel pain (and secondary outcomes) at the 6 months follow-up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up). H2: There is a difference between sham-rESWT and usual care on change in heel pain (and secondary outcomes ) at 6 months follow-up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up). H3: There is a difference between standardized exercise program and usual care on change in heel pain (and secondary outcomes) at 6 months follow- up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up).
Plantar fasciitis is seen common in clinics and responsible from most of foot related pain problems. There are many treatment modalities in the literature as well as there is no golden standard to treat plantar fasciitis in non-surgical ways. The aim of this study is to compare intensive physiotherapy program, home based exercise program and control group decide the most effective rehabilitation program in plantar fasciitis.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of acupuncture to a standard of care prescribed exercise program is more effective at improving pain and function in adult patients with plantar fasciosis.
This is a clinical trial that will be done in the state of Kuwait, at the physical rehabilitation medicine hospital. the participants will be recruited from all over Kuwait, there is a clinical registry upon the ethical committee in Kuwait assigned by the ministry of health.
The primary aim of this clinical experiment is to compare, in terms of pain relief measured using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (5-7), the clinical results of ultrasound-guided injection (USGI) versus anatomic topography-guided injection (ATGI) of corticosteroid for the treatment of proximal PF. Secondary aims will be to compare foot-related quality of life, as measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI)and the Bristol Foot Score (BFS), between the injection groups, and also to compare the pre-injection to late-term post-injection thickness of the plantar fascia as measured in the nested USGI group.