View clinical trials related to Physician's Role.
Filter by:In a recent report, drug spending increased by 23.4 percent annually in the inpatient setting from 2013 to 2015 with the average inpatient drug spending increasing from $714 to $990 per admission. A retrospective analysis from Johns Hopkins showed potential annual savings of over $1,100,000 dollars with a switch from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) administration of four inpatient medications. Another study actively encouraging the conversion of IV to PO medications demonstrated a decrease in therapeutic costs. A number of benefits occur at the conversion of IV to oral medications including the reduced risk of secondary cannula- related infections, inflammation, and pain in the area of administration. Most oral agents are less expensive than the related IV medications. Other benefits occur in indirect administration costs such as the expense of nursing labor and equipment. The switch from IV to oral medication has also been shown to result in earlier discharge of patients, potentially saving medical costs. The investigators have chosen to further the research of the conversion of IV to PO medications by combining prior knowledge on the subject with robust clinical decision support. Our research will prompt providers at the right time in the workflow to switch from IV to PO medications. The investigators will exclude patients less than 18 years old, with a NPO status, or a severe disease state (vasopressor dependent, decreased consciousness, seizures, severely immunocompromised (ANC < 500), or life- threatening infections such as sepsis, Central Nervous System (CNS) infections, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, etc.). The medications eligible for this research project were identified through comparison of the wholesale price of the intravenous and oral formulations. To select medications with a potential for savings, the investigators factored in the frequency of IV administrations in the past five months using our electronic health record system (EHR) to help identify highly utilized medications. The product of the largest cost differential and frequency was used to decide on the following list of medications for this project: Lacosamide, Doxycycline, Levothyroxine, Linezolid, Acetaminophen, Rifampin, Amiodarone and Levofloxacin. The principal trigger for the clinical decision support prompt will be a current diet order listed in the patient's chart or an order for another medication via the oral route. These orders will flag the patient as eligible for po medications. Once the patient has been identified to be eligible for PO medications, the presence of an order for an IV formulation of one of the above drugs will prompt a once-daily alert to the provider upon opening the chart for the conversion to PO medication. Providers will be randomized to receive the alert. Past experience has shown that such an alert will remind providers not only to switch the drug in questions to PO form, but other medications as well. For the providers not receiving the alert, the investigators will record when it would have been triggered for the first time. The trial will run for three months to completion. Analysis at the time of study completion will occur on primary (number of doses of candidate medication administered IV and PO after the alert) and secondary outcomes (number of doses of other medication not on our IV and PO list, cost savings, presence of an iv drip, episodes of sepsis or bacteremia). The investigators will monitor for potential complications by monitoring length of stay after triggering the alert. The investigators will also monitor the doses of hyaluronidase administered to patients after the alert was triggered.
Mayo Clinic's Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Model System Center (TBIMSC) will capitalize on longstanding collaborations with the non-profit Minnesota Brain Injury Alliance (MN BIA) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to test a new way of delivering medical and social services. This trial will address chronic unmet needs expressed by individuals with TBI and their families in the U.S. pertaining to the ineffective connection to specialized medical and community resources in the transition from hospital to community-based care, limited access to TBI experts, and lack of primary care provider (PCP) knowledge about the complex needs of individuals with TBI. Target populations for this study are: 1) individuals with TBI eligible for MN BIA provided Resource Facilitation (RF), 2) their families, and 3) their PCPs. This clinical trial will use a theory-driven complex behavioral intervention that integrates the medical-rehabilitation, therapy, and TBI expertise of Mayo's Brain Rehabilitation Clinic (BRC) with MN BIA's highly developed RF program (a free two-year telephone support service offering assistance in navigating life after brain injury). Mayo Clinic's medical-rehabilitation expertise will be integrated with RF services to deliver direct clinical care remotely using telemedicine and other information and communication technology to test whether outcomes over time are better in a group receiving this model of care compared to a group that receives usual care in their communities. Costs between usual care and intervention groups will be compared in collaboration with the MDH. The overarching goal is development of a replicable, sustainable, and cost effective model of telemedicine care that integrates TBIMS Centers and BIAs nationwide and builds TBI expertise and capacity among PCPs.
This large scale multi-center cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to assess the comparative effectiveness of three interventions in diverse ambulatory care settings and patient populations. Findings will help healthcare systems decide which approach to adopt to empower patients and enable providers to engage in patient centered communication. The specific aims are to: 1. Engage with patients and healthcare providers who have used the tools in the pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02522286) at the Sutter Health Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), as well as new stakeholders at University of California San Diego Health System and Meyers Primary Care Institute at University of Massachusetts and Reliant Medical Group, to further refine and adapt these patient-centered interventions to be integrated into real world primary care clinics. 2. Conduct a large scale cluster RCT with three arms, to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of three interventions: OPEN with in-person SPI training (High Touch), OPEN with online SPI training (High Tech), and ASK. Primary outcomes will include patient perceptions of how well their PCPs have engaged them in patient centered communication. The investigators will also measure patients' confidence in managing their health, intention to follow through with care plans, and downstream behaviors in following through with care plans, use of services such as phone calls, secure messaging, and additional visits. 3. Identify the strategy that has the most potential for sustained impact and replication within and across healthcare systems. The investigators will analyze the fidelity to the intervention protocols, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time/effort involved in implementing the interventions. The investigators will also assess the extent to which the programs become institutionalized. The investigators anticipate that this multi-level healthcare system intervention will result in significant improvement in: patient satisfaction with how PCP has engaged them in the visit, confidence in selfcare; patients' intention to adhere to care plan, and clinical indicators. Furthermore, more effective communication would lower health service utilization after the visit. The investigators further expect that the intervention will affect physicians', medical assistants' and nurses' experience as well as healthcare system leaders' intention to implement in routine practice.
This research study is designed to answer the question: How does professional coaching impact early career academic emergency medicine physician goal attainment, leadership strengths, well-being, and burnout?
10 Clinics within Stanford Health Care are randomized to receive or not receive provider alerts for 5 commonly overused tests and treatments.
Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) are information technology-based software that provide health professionals with actionable, patient-specific recommendations or guidelines for disease diagnosis, treatment, and management at the point-of-care. CDSSs may be integrated with patient electronic health records (EHRs) and evidence-based knowledge.
This study implements a simple evidence-based patient activation intervention - "Ask 3 Questions"- augmented by a novel theory-based intervention - "Open Communication" - aimed at activating patients and healthcare providers. The goal of this project is to increase patient and physician's preparedness for more having more questions, expressing differing opinions, and working collaboratively in making medical decisions that are both informed and responsive to patients' needs and preferences.
This study attempted to identify the best method for educating and engaging academic physicians in grateful patient philanthropy.
This study is a prospective cross-sectional survey study. The investigators developed self-administrated questionnaire and recruit 120 physicians in two hospitals and 60 lawyers from some law firms to this study. To realize and compare the opinions of physicians and lawyers about controversial decision-making of surrogate.