View clinical trials related to Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The goal of this retrospective registry is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Refralon®, concentrate for solution for intravenous injection, as chemical cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation and flutter in routine clinical practice. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the incidence of sinus rhythm restoration within 6 hours in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) after the first dose of Refralon®? - What is the incidence of sinus rhythm restoration within 24 hours in patients with persistent AF/AFL after the first dose of Refralon®?
In patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), current clinical guidelines recommend ablation for rhythm control. While percutaneous ablation has good results in patients with paroxysmal AF, it is not clear which is the best technique in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Our group performed the first randomized study of thoracoscopic epicardial ablation vs. endocardial catheter ablation (FAST Trial), which showed better results for epicardial ablation but with a higher rate of complications. Hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation strategies have recently been described sequentially, showing better results in patients with persistent AF, but 40% of patients are still refractory to ablation. Our study aims to compare the conventional strategy (catheter ablation) with partial electrical isolation of the left atrium endo-epicardially (pulmonary veins, posterior wall and left atrial appendage) in a single procedure in the group of patients most refractory to ablation. Likewise, using magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography to analyze the atrial remodeling factors that can predict the success and failure of both therapies. Methodology: A 1:1 randomized clinical trial in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF in two groups: conventional ablation vs. partial endo-epicardial isolation. Prior to ablation, cardioversion will be performed and functionality and atrial size will be verified by echocardiography and delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will detect the degree of fibrosis and atrial remodeling. During the ablation procedure, a continuous rhythm recording device will be implanted. Likewise, at three months the MRI will be repeated to detect post-ablation fibrosis. At six months the echocardiography will be performed to assess atrial function and size. Main Expected Results: The expected results include: 1. an improvement in the rate of patients with no atrial arrhythmias recurrence in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation; 2. a lower AF burden in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation who have had recurrence; 3. To know the degree of atrial fibrosis associated with the success/failure of each technique; 4. To know the degree of fibrosis that both techniques produce; 5. To know the degree of ventricular function associated with the success/failure of each technique; 6. To know the degree of potentially lost atrial function; 7. To Compare the safety of both techniques
The study is a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial aiming to compare two method in guidance of Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOMEI), i.e., the conventional fluoroscopy-guided VOMEI and UNIVU-guided VOMEI.
Atrial The treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) includes 2 axes: the prevention of the cardio-embolic risk and rhythm control. The possibilities for this control are antiarrhythmic drugs and, above all, catheter ablation, an interventional cardiology technique which consists in treating the areas responsible for the initiation and perpetuation of AF by applying radiofrequency energy or cryotherapy to the myocardial tissue. Limited research has been done on the combination of different parameters to manage AF, especially during the initial stage of the disease. A translational and multimodal approach could make it possible to better characterize this pathology and thus, help to adjust the therapeutic management for the patients. The combined analysis of regional electrophysiological, morphological, and functional parameters of the left atrium could make it possible to better detect early atrial cardiomyopathy and predict recurrences of atrial fibrillation.
This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Globe® Pulsed Field System for treating patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
To acquire, amplify, digitize, and record atrial intracardiac electrophysiology signals during cardiac electrophysiology studies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation and to use the recorded data to test the performance of an signal complexity visualization algorithm.
This is a randomized control trial to compare the efficacy and safety of CARTO-Finder-guided ablation plus pulmonary vein isolation versus multiscale entropy (MSE)-guided pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
The objective of the ADVANTAGE AF Study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System (FARAPULSE PFA System) for treatment of drug resistant, symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF).
A prospective, single-arm, multi-center study designed to collect real world safety and performance data of the Adagio Medical iCLAS Cryoablation System in the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF), Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PsAF), and Atrial Flutter (AFL).
A randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of staged hybrid ablation when compared with standard catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)