View clinical trials related to Peritonitis.
Filter by:Short Post-operative Antibacterial Therapy in Complicated Appendicitis: Oral Versus Intravenous is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing 24 hour intravenous antibacterial therapy to 24 hour oral antibacterial therapy after surgery in complicated appendicitis.
Hospitals, and more specifically Intensive Care Units (ICU), face the challenging issue of emergence and rapid spread of multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDR). In some cases, the therapeutic choice is extremely limited. Prevention and adequacy of antibiotic therapy (AB) are the key responses applied toward these threats. A delayed adequate AB is a known factor of poor prognosis. Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are frequent, polymicrobial and life threatening diseases. Source control and adequate AB are instrumental issues in this setting. Despite technical advances, susceptibility testing of the microorganisms collected from peritoneal samples is not usually available before day two or three after surgery. In this time lapse, empiric AB might be inadequate (not targeting all the pathogens, which leads to a prolonged duration of AB and potential increased morbidity/mortality risk) or too broad (with the two issues of ecology with an increased risk of selection of MDR bacteria and additional costs). In a pilot study evaluating the potential benefit of a direct culture of peritoneal samples from resuscitation patients treated for peritonitis, we observed that conventional treatment made it possible to obtain microbiological results within a median of 3 [extremes 2-7] days whereas a direct microbiological technique by E-test gave results in 1 [1-2] days (p <0.0001). With this technique close to conventional microbiological, a change in antibiotic therapy could have been achieved within an average of 1 [1-2] days versus 4 [1-11] days with conventional management (p = 0, 0006). The development of modern molecular techniques suggests that a large margin of improvement for the rendering and the precision of the results is possible.
The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical utility of mean platelet volume (MPV) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as diagnostic markers for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).
Patient with liver cirrhosis commonly have co-existing small bowel bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) yet may be asymptomatic. It is unclear as to the value of treating SIBO in asymptomatic individuals. Cirrhosis increase permeability of the gastrointestinal mucosa. It is postulated that in cirrhosis, endotoxins translocate across the gut mucosal barrier resulting in a second hit within hepatocyte perpetuating decompensation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. We hypothesise that cirrhosis patients with concomitant SIBO are particularly vulnerable for endotoxin translocation and would benefit from treatment. Treatment of SIBO would reduce the risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and other liver-related morbidities. We aim to treat a cohort of patients with severe liver disease and concomitant SIBO with antibiotics as prophylaxis and compare the risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, further liver-related morbidity and survival against untreated asymptomatic controls.
the study is to evaluate the possible efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide as an adjuvant therapy in the secondary prevention of SBP in patient with cirrhosis.
Sepsis is defined as systemic response to infection ,and it is a main problem in ICU and despite advance in supportive care, the mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis continues to exceed 30% [Bone RC 1993].The effects of bacterial invasion of body tissues result from combined actions of enzymes and toxins produced by micro-organisms themselves and by a network of proinflammatory mediators and cytokines as tumour necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 which are overexpressed after various noxious insults[P.Delong et al. 2006],[ Yealy et al. 2014]. the patients who are subjected to abdominal surgery in order to treat the cause surgically,and many of these surgical procedures are lengthy and are at risk for either pre-operatively or post-operatively with steady increase in intra-abdominal pressure(IAP) [Malbrain ML et al. 2007] Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is defined as IAP equal to or greater than 12 mmHg whereas abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as IAP greater than 20 mmHg, abdominal perfusing pressure (APP) is used to predict prognosis of both IAH and ACS [Malbrain ML et al. 2006]. The choice for using a sedative agent in ICU for mechanically ventilated patients post-operatively is therefore a crucial one as these patients are under hyperstress state and often require drugs for sedation and analgesia[ Chanques G et al. 2006]. Analgesics and sedation agents have clearly been shown to alter cellular function and other mediators of immune system with wide range of immune modulation ,ranging from immunosuppressive effects to significant anti-inflammatory effects during endotoxaemia[ Taniguchi et al. 2004] Also sedation and /or analgesia have the potential to reduce IAP through improvement of abdominal wall compliance. Although propofol and dexmedetomidine are used for sedation in ICU there are limited data on their effects on inflammatory responses and IAP in septic patients. In clinical practice, septic patients treated with dexmedetomidine have shorter time on the ventilator as compared with those treated with lorazepam, a benzodiazepine and this beneficial effect of dexmedetomidine is more pronounced in septic patients than in nonseptic patients. This outcome may be partly the result of dexmedetomidine induced reduction in pulmonary inflammatory mediators and lung tissue damage.[ M. Ueki et al. 2014] Midazolam is known to inhibit certain aspects of the immune function. It was suggested that benzodiazepines bind to specific receptors on macrophages and inhibit their capacity to produce IL-1, IL-6, and TNFα. Propofol, nowadays, has become a preferred sedative in ICU because it offers advantages over benzodiazepines in terms of lack of accumulation, quick onset, easy adjustment, and fast recovery after discontinuation. [ Jacobi J et al. 2002]
timely short-term antibiotic prophylaxis is an essential step in the management of these patients . Prophylaxis must be instituted as early as variceal hemorrhage is suspected, and timely administration has been associated with a reduced re-bleeding rate and lower mortality . More recently, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommended antibiotic prophylaxis in all cirrhotic patients with UGIB, regardless of its source (i.e. variceal or non-variceal) or the presence of ascites.
The current hypothesis is that robotic-assisted surgery results in a reduced systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response (SIRS) compared to laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colon cancer. The purpose is to evaluate differences in the peritoneal and systemic inflammatory response in robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery of patients undergoing resection for colon cancer in a randomized, blinded controlled trial.
Patients undergoing emergency surgery for peritonitis are at increased risk of abdominal wall-related complications. In patients with peritonitis the risk of incisional hernia (IH) is extremely elevated. The incidence of IH in patients operated with peritonitis is up to 54 %, compared with an incidence of 11-26 % in the general surgical population. Moreover, up to 24.1 % of patients with peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy may develop fascial dehiscence. The evaluation of quality of life of patients with IH showed lower mean scores on physical components of health-related quality of life and body image. The prophylactic mesh implantation demonstrated to reduce the incisional hernia rate in patients undergoing vascular or bariatric procedures. However, the intraperitoneal non absorbable mesh implantation in infected fields is generally considered at least of doubtful safety because of the theoretical increased risk of chronic mesh infection and enterocutaneous fistula. Most incisional hernias develop during the first three months after surgery, which represents the critical period for the healing of transected muscular and fibrous layers of the abdominal wall. However, most studies recommended a long-term follow up period of up to at least 5 years for midline abdominal incisions to determine the real incisional hernia rate. The midline abdominal incision is preferred in abdominal surgery, as it provides wide and rapid access compared other incisions. However, the incidence of incisional hernias is higher following midline abdominal incisions than in other abdominal incisions. In emergency surgery the midline incision in the majority of cases is a necessity. Several factors affect the process of wound healing: surgical site infection, poor surgical technique, and patient-related factors (i.e. peritonitis, old age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, nutritional deficiencies, hepatic cirrhosis, jaundice, renal impairment, malignancy, cardiac disease, chest problems, previous abdominal incisions, steroid therapy). Data about the use of biological prosthesis in infected fields are scarce and derive principally from case reports and case series. However, indications about their use and usefulness in infected fields have been recently published by the Italian Biological Prosthesis Working Group (IBPWG). A previously published prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of implantation of biological prosthesis in high risk patients in order to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia. This study suggested the efficacy of this kind of prosthesis in reducing incisional hernia rate in patients with multiple risk factors. A recently published meta-analysis showed as the use of biological prosthesis in ventral hernia repair resulted in a lower infectious wound complication rate but in an similar recurrence rate. These results supports the application of biological prosthesis in high risk patients. One recent systematic review evaluated the positive effect on incisional hernia rate of the prophylactic mesh positioning in high risk patients. No randomized trials have been published since now about the use of biological prosthesis in contaminated or infected fields. The rationale of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the use of swine dermal collagen prosthesis implanted preperitoneally as a prophylactic procedure against incisional hernia in patients operated in urgency/emergency setting in contaminated/infected fields with peritonitis. The aim of the study is to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia from 50% to 20%.
This study evaluates the use of Dalbavancin 1500 mg IV x 1 dose for treating patients with gram positive peritonitis in patients requiring peritoneal dialysis.