Diode Laser for Treatment of Peri-implantitis

Peri-Implantitis Clinical Trial

— LAS  

Official title:

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis and Non-surgical Debridement With Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03383120
• Other study ID #: 2016-02205
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 10, 2017
• Est. completion date: April 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: May 2021
• Source: University of Geneva, Switzerland
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year.

Description:

Peri-implantitis is a major complication for dental implant patients, with its prevalence estimated in the order of 10% of implants and 20% of patients after 5 to 10 years of implant placement. When left untreated, peri-implantitis may cause progressive tissue destruction, esthetic complications and, eventually, implant loss. Despite numerous clinical trials and systematic reviews, studies have failed to identify a standardized protocol for the treatment of such conditions. Still, current literature and expert opinions recommend mechanical debridement of the implant followed by early evaluation and surgical intervention, implant decontamination using a wide variety of mechanical and chemical methods, then adjunctive systematic antibiotics. However, given the aggressive nature of surgical interventions, the inherent difficulty of decontaminating the implants' rough surfaces with conventional methods, in addition to the growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, the search for alternative approaches has become imperative. Since implant decontamination is the key aspect to resolution of peri-implantitis, different mechanical and chemical methods have been tested in that respect. In recent years, lasers have been attracting significant attention in this particular field. Diode lasers, in particular, have been shown to have potent bactericidal and photobiomodulatory effects promoting wound healing and tissue regeneration. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application in comparison with conventional surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions following an observation period of one year. The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year. 40 subjects will be randomly distributed into two parallel groups: 1. Test group (n= 20); receiving non-surgical mechanical debridement and adjunctive diode laser application at days 0, 7 and 14. 2. Control group (n= 20); receiving initial mechanical debridement at day 0, followed by open flap debridement and prescription of post-operative systemic antimicrobials at day 14.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: April 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: October 30, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
• At least one solid screw-type titanium implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis; which is defined as at least one site with probing depth =5mm, bleeding on probing and/or suppuration, and radiographic evidence of crater-form bone loss =2 threads after insertion of the final prosthetic supra-structure.
• Sound prosthetic supra-structure.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to Amoxicillin and/or Metronidazole,
• Systemic diseases that could compromise wound healing (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV or bone metabolic disorders), radiation or immunosuppressive therapy,
• Women who are pregnant or breast feeding,
• Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse,
• Heavy smokers consuming >10 cigarettes/day,
• Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
• Participants not willing to attend regular dental maintenance visits and follow-up evaluations,
• Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
• Previous enrolment into the current study,
• Active periodontal disease.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Implant Complication
• Peri-Implantitis

Intervention

Device:
• Laser treatment
Laser treatment of the peri-implantitis lesion includes mechanical debridement of the implant using an ultrasonic device and plastic curettes followed by diode laser sub-mucosal application for 90 seconds. This is repeated two more times at one-week intervals.

Procedure:
• Surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics
Mechanical debridement of the implant will be done in a similar manner to the test group (without laser application) followed by open flap debridement 2 weeks after, and post-operative prescription of Amoxicillin and Metronidazole systemic antibiotics 3 times per day for a period of 1 week

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Switzerland	University of Geneva	Geneva	Genève 4

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Geneva, Switzerland

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Switzerland, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Resolution of the peri-implantitis	Defined as A absence of probing depths > 4 mm, bleeding on probing or suppuration at the end of the observation period	12 months
Primary	Types and frequencies of adverse events	Any adverse events related or unrelated to the treatment administered is recorded at the time and appropriate treatment is performed. The frequency, duration and intensity is also recorded.	12 months
Primary	Patient reported outcomes at 1 week	A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate post-operative discomfort and patient's perception of the administered treatment 1 week post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating absence of pain and 100 being the worst pain imaginable.	1 week post-operatively
Primary	Patient reported outcomes at 12 months	A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate general patient's perception of the administered treatment 12 months post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating lack of discomfort or pain and complete satisfaction and 100 being completely unsatisfied and/or with persisting pain or other symptoms.	12 months
Secondary	Change in marginal bone levels	Changes in peri-implant marginal bone levels are measured on intra-oral radiographs taken at baseline and 12 months post-operatively. Two independent examiners perform measurements and mean values are taken. This outcome is only calculated 12 months postoperatively.	12 months
Secondary	Differences between groups regarding changes in mean marginal bone level changes	Comparison in mean marginal bone level changes (outcome 4) are performed between the test and control groups	12 months
Secondary	Number of residual pockets > 4 mm	Number of residual peri-implant pockets exceeding 4 mm are measured around all included implants at the end of the observation period to asses the presence of any residual peri-implant soft-tissue inflammation	12 months
Secondary	Changes in probing depth	The change in mean probing depth between baseline and 12 months is calculated to assess treatment outcomes and disease resolution around all included implants. This outcome is calculated only once 12 months post-operatively.	12 months