View clinical trials related to Peri-implant Mucositis.
Filter by:This prospective parallel, double-blind, four-arm randomised controlled clinical study is planned to assess the difference in the level of the inflammatory biomarkers expressed following the placement of the first dental implant in patients with history of periodontitis (successfully treated) and healthy controls without the disease, during implant osseointegration period. The subjects in both groups will also be randomised to receive one of the two types of implants provided which have different surface treatment.
The purpose of this research study is to determine the impact of glycine powder air-abrasive debridement (GPAD) on the microbiology of the tissues surrounding dental implants with health and inflammation (peri-implant mucositis).
- Capture of the potential risk factor "lack of band of keratinised mucosa" over a period of up to 5 years. - Recording of peri-implant inflammatory processes in study participants that are not recorded during normal tooth cleaning - Registration of the extent of radiographic bone loss. Bone resorption through analysis of existing X-ray images - Individual therapy recommendation/individual supportive peri-implant care in case of peri-implant inflammation - The present study was specifically designed to investigate the effect of reduced width of keratinized mucosa (KM) on the secondary prevention of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis in patients attending a supportive peri-implant care program (SPIC) over an observation period of up to five years.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the adjunctive effect of glycine-powder air-polishing (GPAP) to full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (Fm-UD) in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis, and to determine the predictive role of implant and patient-level variables for disease resolution. Both treatments are described in the literature, but few studies are available on their comparison.
The attachment of peri implant soft tissue to the implant serves as a biological seal that can prevent the development of inflammatory peri-implant diseases. Presence of contaminants has been suggested to be associated with tissue damaging inflammation and titanium wear microparticles were demonstrated to activate osteoclastic action. Er: YAG laser has been extensively investigated clinically for applications for treating periimplantitis either independently or in combination with other techniques, showing favorable outcomes. Plasma spray treatment can decontaminate surfaces without modifying their topography. It is also able to increase the surface energy by obtaining more hydrophilic surfaces, which may increase the capacity of the titanium oxide layer to interact with cells and proteins of surrounding tissue improving cell adhesion to the treated surface.
The goal of the clinical trial is to compare laser therapy with ultrasonic therapy in patients with inflammation in the tissue surrounding single implants (peri-implant mucositis). The outcomes are bleeding on probing (BOP), pocket depth, suppuration, recession of the peri-implant mucosal margin, the treatment time and changes in bone levels before and after treatment in the test, and control group respectively. The quality of life will be measured from a standardized protocol. The hypothesis is that treatment with laser therapy in patients with peri-implant mucositis will show less inflammation with less bleeding and a better pocket closure compared to the treatment with the ultrasound.
Mechanical debridement is the traditional method for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis and its success depends on the patient's correct oral hygiene. It is believed that probiotics may help by their ability to modulate the oral biofilm, resulting in anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial plaque action. The aim of this study is to evaluate the adjuvant effect of the probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri in the mechanical treatment of peri-implant mucositis. This study aims to include 32 subjects with implant-supported total rehabilitation and peri-implant mucositis, divided into test and control groups, equally subjected to professional mechanical debridement, with the administration of a daily GUM® PerioBalance® lozenge for 30 days added to the test group. Plaque Index, Bleeding Index and probing pocket depth are evaluated before the intervention (baseline) and at 6 and 10 weeks later.
To evaluate the resolution of naturally occurring peri-implant mucositis (PM) treated by means of non-surgical mechanical debridement (NSMD) with or without full-mouth disinfection approach (FMD).
The use of titanium dental implants has become a common modern treatment to restore teeth. Although the success rate of dental implants is high, inflammation around the dental implant still occurs. The current study will investigate if the inflammation around the implant is due to bacterial infection, hypersensitivity or both. The goal of this cross-sectional study is to (1) Establish the levels of cytokines in peri-implant crevicular fluid associated with bacterial infection and hypersensitivity reaction; (2) Compare the levels of cytokines associated with hypersensitivity and bacterial infection between healthy implants and inflamed implants (peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis); (3) Determine whether the difference in the levels of cytokines, if they exist, reflects the clinical diagnosis of healthy implants and inflamed implants.
This two-arm, single-blinded, monocentric, controlled, randomised clinical study is designed to examine the effect of professional submucosal treatment by means of ultrasonics with plastic tip (test group), as compared to no professional submucosal instrumentation (control group), in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PIM). Both groups will have oral hygiene instruction/reinforcement (OHI) at baseline and repeated at 3 months. In the study, 50 participants will be enrolled (25 per group), with each patient contributing one implant with PIM. Peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) samples will be obtained at baseline, 3- and 6-months to analyse the change of relevant biomarkers over the course of PIM treatment. Intraoral scans will be performed at baseline, 3- and 6-months to analyse potential soft-tissue volumetric changes according to treatment.