View clinical trials related to Peptic Ulcer.
Filter by:This study aims at evaluating efficacy and safety of high-dose esomeprazole and amoxicillin dual therapy(esomeprazole and amoxicillin) versus bismuth-containing quadruple Therapy(bismuth，esomeprazole，tetracycline and furazolidone) in H. pylori rescue therapy. It is hypothesized that high-dose esomeprazole and amoxicillin dual therapy is non-inferior to bismuth-containing quadruple Therapy. Patients with confirmed failure of H. pylori eradication will be randomized to one of the treatments described above. At week 6 follow-up visits, a urea breath test，rapid urease test or helicobacter pylori stool antigen test will be performed to confirm eradication.
The study was a cross-sectional single-center study, conducted at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong university school of medicine. We retrieved the medical records of all patients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2019. The medical records were analyzed for the prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcers.
Endoscopic treatment is recommended for initial hemostasis in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the additional hemostatic efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) has not been widely investigated. We designed a randomized trial comparing APC plus injection therapy vs hemoclipping plus injection therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding.
The purpose of the study was to improve treatment results of patients with bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers by endoscopic applications of autoplasma, enriched with platelets and granular sorbent aseptisorb-A.
This project aims to evaluate the data on all patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
This study compares 2 different ways of perioperative management in patients of peptic perforation. Experimental arm is the ERAS arm( Enhanced recovery after surgery) and the comparative arm is Conventional arm.
To capture safety and efficacy when Nexium are administered to pediatric patients in clinical practice after launch
This is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CEGP003 in patients with acute peptic ulcers bleeding, compared to endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy.
A prospective study of bleeding peptic ulcers and/or erosions in the upper gastrointestinal tract - risk-medication, presence of Helicobacter pylori, treatment and outcome.
The purpose of this phase study is to confirm the efficacy and safety by compare ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcer bleeding were enrolled in a multi-center, stratified randomized, non-inferiority test, double-blind, parallel and positive-controlled trial. They were randomly assigned into two groups, ilaprazole and omeprazole, to be treated for up to 30 days. The primary endpoint was the hemostasis rate at the end of 72 hours. Secondary end points include ulcer staging changes within 72 hours, effective rate of hemostasis, hemostasis duration, average blood transfusion and rebleeding rate, etc.