Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04469426
Other study ID # JGH-2020-2073
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 15, 2020
Est. completion date March 15, 2023

Study information

Verified date August 2022
Source Jewish General Hospital
Contact Jeongyoon Moon, MD
Phone 5145676370
Email jeongyoon.moon@mail.mcgill.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

After surgery for rectal cancer, many people undergo changes in bowel habits, which may include the need to empty their bowels more often, accidental leakage of stool or gas, the sudden urge to go to the bathroom, and more. The term "Low Anterior Resection Syndrome" or LARS is used to describe these symptoms. LARS has a negative impact on one's quality of life, and can lead to frustration, as there is no single intervention that has proven to be effective for LARS, and each patient has to undergo trial and error to find one's solution. As people struggle with LARS, they describe feeling hopeless and isolated. Peer support is a supportive relationship between individuals who share common experiences or face similar challenges. The goal of our study is to evaluate whether use of an online peer support application with trained mentors who themselves have lived or are living with LARS will empower patients to better manage their LARS symptoms and improve their quality of life.


Description:

Restorative proctectomy is increasingly being performed for rectal cancer, allowing patients to avoid permanent colostomy. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) refers to a constellation of bowel symptoms including frequency, urgency, incontinence, and clustering of bowel movements, that can affect up to 70 to 90% of patients following restorative proctectomy. Symptoms can last up to 15 years after resection. Currently, there is no standard treatment for LARS and management is symptom-based and reactive, rather than proactive. A recent focus group conducted at our institution among LARS patients and caregivers showed that people living with LARS experience anxiety and isolation due to their symptoms. Peer support could be an important psychosocial intervention for people living with LARS, helping them normalize and validate their experience. Peer support refers to a supportive relationship between individuals who share common experiences or face similar challenges. This approach has been associated with positive physical and mental health outcomes for several patient populations. Our research group conducted a comprehensive review of online health information for patients with LARS, and demonstrated that existing online resources were generally of poor quality and lacked important content. With this knowledge, we created a LARS educational booklet and developed an online app containing LARS educational material and an interactive forum for online peer support. We are now in an optimal position to rigorously test the potential effects of this initiative on patient-centered outcomes. This study is a multicenter, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-groups, pragmatic trial involving patients from 5 large colorectal surgery practices (Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre-Montreal, QC; Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital- Toronto, ON; Saint Paul's Hospital-Vancouver, BC). Participants will be randomized into the intervention group, who will have access to the online peer support app, and the control group who will only receive a LARS patient educational booklet. Trained peer support mentors will moderate discussion in the peer support forum, which will also be monitored daily by expert health care professionals. Data regarding patient demographics, disease and treatment characteristics will be obtained via hospital chart review. The primary outcome will be health- related quality of life at 6 months. Secondary outcomes will be patient activation and bowel function. We hypothesize that availability of this app (consisting of LARS information, a closed forum for discussion among peers and trained peer support mentors) improves health-related quality of life when compared to the comparison group. Given the significant numbers of patients who suffer from LARS symptoms following restorative proctectomy and the potential chronic nature of their symptoms, this RCT has the potential to contribute important knowledge to support patient-centered care of rectal cancer survivors. The technology addressed in this study (a mobile app for information and online peer support) is readily accessible and can be relatively easily implemented across large range of geographic jurisdictions and surgical settings.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date March 15, 2023
Est. primary completion date September 15, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 100 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - underwent restorative protectomy for Neo-plastic disease of the rectum - completed all treatment within the last 3 years - patients with minor or major LARS as defined with the LARS score. Exclusion Criteria: - Active chemotherapy or radiotherapy - Major colonic resection in addition to protectomy - Cannot be contacted by telephone - Unable to read and comprehend English/French - Does not have the appropriate interface to access the app - Unable to give clear and informed consent

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Interactive online informational and peer support app
The app contains LARS information, bowel function diaries, and online platform with trained peer support mentor

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Jewish General Hospital Montreal Quebec
Canada McGill University Health Centre Montréal Quebec
Canada Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto Ontario
Canada University Health Network Toronto Ontario
Canada St Paul's Hospital Vancouver British Columbia

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Jewish General Hospital McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada, Providence Healthcare, University Health Network, Toronto

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire - C30 questionnaire Questionnaire measures baseline quality of life before app use. Maximum score 100 (better function, quality of life). Minimum score 0 (worse function, quality of life). 1 week before the launch of the app
Primary Assessing 'Change' via European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire - C30 questionnaire after 6 months Questionnaire measures change in quality of life after app use. Maximum score 100 (better function, quality of life). Minimum score 0 (worse function, quality of life). 6 months after using the app.
Secondary Patient activation measures Questionnaire measures patient activation before app use. Maximum score 52 (higher patient activation), Minimum score 13 (lower patient activation). 1 week before the launch of the app
Secondary Change in Patient activation measures Questionnaire measures patient activation after app use. Maximum score 52 (higher patient activation), Minimum score 13 (lower patient activation). 6 months after using the app.
Secondary Bowel function Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score Questionnaire measures bowel function before app use. Maximum score 42 (worse bowel function). Minimum score 0 (better bowel function) 1 week before the launch of the app
Secondary Bowel function Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score Questionnaire measures bowel function after app use. Maximum score 42 (worse bowel function). Minimum score 0 (better bowel function) 6 months after using the app.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04079543 - NPO and Patient Satisfaction in the Cath Lab N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05053958 - Using Superimposition of Intra-Oral Scan and CBCT in Single Implant Restorations in Aesthetic Zone. N/A
Completed NCT04204785 - Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions N/A
Completed NCT04774562 - The Effect of Video-Assisted Discharge Education After Total Hip Replacement Surgery N/A
Terminated NCT04604340 - Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Access for Cerebral Angiography in Adolescents N/A
Recruiting NCT04539210 - Screw-retained Maxillary Complete Denture With Electric Welded Metal Framework Versus Cast One, Patient Satisfaction Assessment. N/A
Completed NCT02924974 - Spinal Morphine in Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT01052415 - POL and Access Intervention to Reduce HIV Stigma Among Service Providers in China N/A
Recruiting NCT06044103 - Patient-controlled Sedation During Repair of Obstetric Perineal Lacerations Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05670080 - Does MI Have a Therapeutic Role in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? N/A
Completed NCT06114524 - Effect of Binaural Beats on Level of Anxiety and Toleration in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Without Sedation N/A
Completed NCT06141122 - The Colonoscopy Booklet:Effect of a Recipe Resource on Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation and Patient Experience N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04534868 - Patient Acceptance And Satisfaction of Teledermoscopy In General Practice In a Belgian Rural Area N/A
Completed NCT04823390 - Anesthetist Controlled Versus Patient-controlled Sedation: Risks and Benefits Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05884684 - What is the Potential Impact of Reviewing Post-procedure Images With Patients Following Interventional Spine Procedures. N/A
Recruiting NCT05613439 - The Fast-track Centre for Hip and Knee Replacement Database
Recruiting NCT06451510 - Knee Osteoarthritis in the Region of Norrbotten
Withdrawn NCT04625842 - Focus Group Interview Study on Patient Experiences and Satisfaction N/A
Completed NCT04420000 - Effects of Mindfulness Therapy in Patients With Acromegaly and Cushing N/A
Recruiting NCT04842240 - Comparison of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Pre Versus Sub-pectoral Implant Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.