Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Applications of Blood Flow Restriction and Rehabilitation Outcomes
The study aims to evaluate the effect of low load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction or sham blood flow restriction in patients with anterior knee pain and rotator cuff related shoulder pain in a cross-over two-arm randomized, participant and assessor blinded design. More specifically, we aim to investigate the acute and short-term hypoalgesic response (by evaluating pressure pain detection thresholds) of low load exercise with blood flow restriction or sham blood flow restriction, the effect of these interventions in pain during clinical testing, and the possibility of a placebo effect.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | December 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Anterior Knee Pain patients We will recruit 40 male adult participants who had consulted a sports medicine physician in a primary care setting for anterior knee pain complaints. A standardized history and physical examination will be conducted by the physiotherapists of the rehabilitation department for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria: - age over 18 years, - diagnosis of AKP confirmed by history and physical examination (with or without imaging) for more than six weeks - non-traumatic history of pain onset - pain at least during one of the three functional tests used as outcome measure (single-leg shallow leg squat, single-leg deep knee squat, step down) - pain equal or greater than 3/10 on a numeric pain rating scale (at least in 2/3 functional tests) - unobstructed knee range of motion and no pain in passive end-range knee extension Exclusion criteria: - BMI greater than 28 - systemic pathology including inflammatory joint disease or neoplastic disorders - history of deep venous thrombosis - hypertension (systolic pressure >140mmHg) - history of endothelial dysfunction - peripheral vascular disease - diabetes - knee pain referred from the spine - history of previous neurological conditions - any previous medical treatment including injections (past 3 months) or drug therapy (i.e., anti-inflammatory drugs the last 2 weeks) - infection - previous blood flow restriction training - inability to understand written and spoken English or Arabic. Rotator cuff related shoulder pain patients We will recruit 40 male adult participants who had consulted a sports medicine physician in a primary care setting for shoulder complaints. A standardized history and physical examination were conducted by the physiotherapists of the rehabilitation department for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria: - age over 18 years - rotator cuff related shoulder pain for more than six weeks - pain greater than 3/10 on a numeric pain rating scale on active abduction and/or resisted external rotation at zero degrees of shoulder abduction (assessed in standing with the arm in slight abducted position) Exclusion criteria: - full-thickness rotator cuff tear (positive drop-arm sign and/or radiographic or ultrasonographic evidence) - BMI greater than 28 - previous shoulder surgery or shoulder fracture - imaging evidence of severe shoulder osteoarthritis or tendon calcification,\ - adhesive capsulitis - systemic pathology including inflammatory joint disease or neoplastic disorders - restriction of passive range of motion in more than two planes - history of deep venous thrombosis - hypertension (systolic pressure >140mmHg) - history of endothelial dysfunction - peripheral vascular disease - diabetes - shoulder pain referred from the spine - history of previous neurological conditions - any previous medical treatment including injections (past 3 months) or drug therapy (i.e., anti-inflammatory drugs the last 2 weeks) - infection - previous BFR training - inability to understand written and spoken English or Arabic |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Qatar | Aspetar; Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital | Doha |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Aspetar |
Qatar,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pressure pain detection thresholds - PPDTs (knee) | Assessed using a hand-held mechanical pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments) with a 1cm2 rubber disk attached to the pressure gauge by applying the probe perpendicularly to the skin at a pressure rate increase of approximately 1kgf/sec. One assessor blinded to group allocation will obtain measurements with the patient in long sitting with both arms resting on the plinth. PPDTs assessment sites will be marked and evaluated over the most painful location on the knee (when this will be behind the patella the algometer will be placed on the center of patella), the tibialis anterior (halfway between the most superior attachment to the tibia and its tendon in the upper one third of the muscle belly, and the extensor carpi radialis (5cm distal to the lateral epicondyle). The average of the amount of pressure in kilograms of three trials will be used in the data analysis. The order of PPDTs assessment will be randomized among patients with 30 seconds intervals between assessments. | Baseline | |
Primary | Pressure pain detection thresholds - PPDTs (knee) | Assessed using a hand-held mechanical pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments) with a 1cm2 rubber disk attached to the pressure gauge by applying the probe perpendicularly to the skin at a pressure rate increase of approximately 1kgf/sec. One assessor blinded to group allocation will obtain measurements with the patient in long sitting with both arms resting on the plinth. PPDTs assessment sites will be marked and evaluated over the most painful location on the knee (when this will be behind the patella the algometer will be placed on the center of patella), the tibialis anterior (halfway between the most superior attachment to the tibia and its tendon in the upper one third of the muscle belly, and the extensor carpi radialis (5cm distal to the lateral epicondyle). The average of the amount of pressure in kilograms of three trials will be used in the data analysis. The order of PPDTs assessment will be randomized among patients with 30 seconds intervals between assessments. | 15 minutes | |
Primary | Pressure pain detection thresholds - PPDTs (knee) | Assessed using a hand-held mechanical pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments) with a 1cm2 rubber disk attached to the pressure gauge by applying the probe perpendicularly to the skin at a pressure rate increase of approximately 1kgf/sec. One assessor blinded to group allocation will obtain measurements with the patient in long sitting with both arms resting on the plinth. PPDTs assessment sites will be marked and evaluated over the most painful location on the knee (when this will be behind the patella the algometer will be placed on the center of patella), the tibialis anterior (halfway between the most superior attachment to the tibia and its tendon in the upper one third of the muscle belly, and the extensor carpi radialis (5cm distal to the lateral epicondyle). The average of the amount of pressure in kilograms of three trials will be used in the data analysis. The order of PPDTs assessment will be randomized among patients with 30 seconds intervals between assessments. | 1 hour | |
Primary | Pain in clinical tests - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (knee) | Three standardized tests will be used in the study to assess anterior knee pain: a) Single-leg squat (shallow): the patient will be standing near a treatment bed with the height of the bed adjusted to be the mid-point of his thigh (halfway between the greater trochanter and popliteal crease), b) Single-leg squat (deep): the patient will be standing near a treatment bed and the height of the bed will be adjusted to the popliteal crease. The patient will be required to touch but not sit on the surface of the bed, and c) Step-down test: the patient will step down from a 20 cm high step using his injured limb in a slow and controlled manner, touching the ground, and returning to the starting position. Immediately after each test the patient will be asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NPRS) (0-10) | Baseline | |
Primary | Pain in clinical tests - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (knee) | Three standardized tests will be used in the study to assess anterior knee pain: a) Single-leg squat (shallow): the patient will be standing near a treatment bed with the height of the bed adjusted to be the mid-point of his thigh (halfway between the greater trochanter and popliteal crease), b) Single-leg squat (deep): the patient will be standing near a treatment bed and the height of the bed will be adjusted to the popliteal crease. The patient will be required to touch but not sit on the surface of the bed, and c) Step-down test: the patient will step down from a 20 cm high step using his injured limb in a slow and controlled manner, touching the ground, and returning to the starting position. Immediately after each test the patient will be asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NPRS) (0-10) | 15 minutes | |
Primary | Pain in clinical tests - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (knee) | Three standardized tests will be used in the study to assess anterior knee pain: a) Single-leg squat (shallow): the patient will be standing near a treatment bed with the height of the bed adjusted to be the mid-point of his thigh (halfway between the greater trochanter and popliteal crease), b) Single-leg squat (deep): the patient will be standing near a treatment bed and the height of the bed will be adjusted to the popliteal crease. The patient will be required to touch but not sit on the surface of the bed, and c) Step-down test: the patient will step down from a 20 cm high step using his injured limb in a slow and controlled manner, touching the ground, and returning to the starting position. Immediately after each test the patient will be asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NPRS) (0-10) | 1 hour | |
Primary | Pressure pain detection thresholds - PPDTs (shoulder) | Assessed using a hand-held mechanical pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments) with a 1cm2 rubber disk attached to the pressure gauge by applying the probe perpendicularly to the skin at a pressure rate increase of approximately 1kgf/sec. One assessor blinded to group allocation will obtain measurements with the participants in long sitting with both arms resting on the plinth. PPDTs assessment sites will be marked and evaluated over the middle deltoid (muscle belly close to inferolateral insertion), the first interosseous muscle of the hand, and the tibialis anterior (halfway between the most superior attachment to the tibia and its tendon in the upper one third of the muscle belly). The average of the amount of pressure in kgs of 3 trials will be used in the data analysis. The order of PPDTs assessment will be randomized among patients with 30 secs intervals between assessments. | Baseline | |
Primary | Pressure pain detection thresholds - PPDTs (shoulder) | Assessed using a hand-held mechanical pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments) with a 1cm2 rubber disk attached to the pressure gauge by applying the probe perpendicularly to the skin at a pressure rate increase of approximately 1kgf/sec. One assessor blinded to group allocation will obtain measurements with the participants in long sitting with both arms resting on the plinth. PPDTs assessment sites will be marked and evaluated over the middle deltoid (muscle belly close to inferolateral insertion), the first interosseous muscle of the hand, and the tibialis anterior (halfway between the most superior attachment to the tibia and its tendon in the upper one third of the muscle belly). The average of the amount of pressure in kgs of 3 trials will be used in the data analysis. The order of PPDTs assessment will be randomized among patients with 30 secs intervals between assessments. | 15 minutes | |
Primary | Pressure pain detection thresholds - PPDTs (shoulder) | Assessed using a hand-held mechanical pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments) with a 1cm2 rubber disk attached to the pressure gauge by applying the probe perpendicularly to the skin at a pressure rate increase of approximately 1kgf/sec. One assessor blinded to group allocation will obtain measurements with the participants in long sitting with both arms resting on the plinth. PPDTs assessment sites will be marked and evaluated over the middle deltoid (muscle belly close to inferolateral insertion), the first interosseous muscle of the hand, and the tibialis anterior (halfway between the most superior attachment to the tibia and its tendon in the upper one third of the muscle belly). The average of the amount of pressure in kgs of 3 trials will be used in the data analysis. The order of PPDTs assessment will be randomized among patients with 30 secs intervals between assessments. | 1 hour | |
Primary | Pain in isometric shoulder external rotation - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (shoulder) | The isometric test will be performed in a standardized standing position with feet shoulder width apart, hips and knees in slight flexion, elbow flexed to 90°, and wrist in neutral with the palm facing the midline. The test will be performed as a "make" test and will be repeated three times in a standardized sequence with a 10-second rest between repetitions. Participants before testing will practice two sub-maximal efforts to familiarize themselves with the task. Subsequently, they will be asked to build their force gradually to a maximum voluntary effort over a 5 second period, cued by the examiner with a monotonous voice "push…push…push…push…push…relax" to ensure consistent encouragement. The examiner will keep the dynamometer in place such that the transducer head will be aligned just proximal to the ulnar styloid process, matching the force exerted by the subject. The participants will rate their maximum pain in an 11-point numeric rating scale. | Baseline | |
Primary | Pain in isometric shoulder external rotation - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (shoulder) | The isometric test will be performed in a standardized standing position with feet shoulder width apart, hips and knees in slight flexion, elbow flexed to 90°, and wrist in neutral with the palm facing the midline. The test will be performed as a "make" test and will be repeated three times in a standardized sequence with a 10-second rest between repetitions. Participants before testing will practice two sub-maximal efforts to familiarize themselves with the task. Subsequently, they will be asked to build their force gradually to a maximum voluntary effort over a 5 second period, cued by the examiner with a monotonous voice "push…push…push…push…push…relax" to ensure consistent encouragement. The examiner will keep the dynamometer in place such that the transducer head will be aligned just proximal to the ulnar styloid process, matching the force exerted by the subject. The participants will rate their maximum pain in an 11-point numeric rating scale. | 15 minutes | |
Primary | Pain in isometric shoulder external rotation - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (shoulder) | The isometric test will be performed in a standardized standing position with feet shoulder width apart, hips and knees in slight flexion, elbow flexed to 90°, and wrist in neutral with the palm facing the midline. The test will be performed as a "make" test and will be repeated three times in a standardized sequence with a 10-second rest between repetitions. Participants before testing will practice two sub-maximal efforts to familiarize themselves with the task. Subsequently, they will be asked to build their force gradually to a maximum voluntary effort over a 5 second period, cued by the examiner with a monotonous voice "push…push…push…push…push…relax" to ensure consistent encouragement. The examiner will keep the dynamometer in place such that the transducer head will be aligned just proximal to the ulnar styloid process, matching the force exerted by the subject. The participants will rate their maximum pain in an 11-point numeric rating scale. | 1 hour | |
Primary | Strength in isometric shoulder external rotation (shoulder) | The isometric test will be performed in a standardized standing position with feet shoulder width apart, hips and knees in slight flexion, elbow flexed to 90°, and wrist in neutral with the palm facing the midline. The test will be performed as a "make" test and will be repeated three times in a standardized sequence with a 10-second rest between repetitions. Participants before testing will practice two sub-maximal efforts to familiarize themselves with the task. Subsequently, they will be asked to build their force gradually to a maximum voluntary effort over a 5 second period, cued by the examiner with a monotonous voice "push…push…push…push…push…relax" to ensure consistent encouragement. The examiner will keep the dynamometer in place such that the transducer head will be aligned just proximal to the ulnar styloid process, matching the force exerted by the subject. The maximum of the three trials will be used for analyses. | Baseline | |
Primary | Strength in isometric shoulder external rotation (shoulder) | The isometric test will be performed in a standardized standing position with feet shoulder width apart, hips and knees in slight flexion, elbow flexed to 90°, and wrist in neutral with the palm facing the midline. The test will be performed as a "make" test and will be repeated three times in a standardized sequence with a 10-second rest between repetitions. Participants before testing will practice two sub-maximal efforts to familiarize themselves with the task. Subsequently, they will be asked to build their force gradually to a maximum voluntary effort over a 5 second period, cued by the examiner with a monotonous voice "push…push…push…push…push…relax" to ensure consistent encouragement. The examiner will keep the dynamometer in place such that the transducer head will be aligned just proximal to the ulnar styloid process, matching the force exerted by the subject. The maximum of the three trials will be used for analyses. | 15 minutes | |
Primary | Strength in isometric shoulder external rotation (shoulder) | The isometric test will be performed in a standardized standing position with feet shoulder width apart, hips and knees in slight flexion, elbow flexed to 90°, and wrist in neutral with the palm facing the midline. The test will be performed as a "make" test and will be repeated three times in a standardized sequence with a 10-second rest between repetitions. Participants before testing will practice two sub-maximal efforts to familiarize themselves with the task. Subsequently, they will be asked to build their force gradually to a maximum voluntary effort over a 5 second period, cued by the examiner with a monotonous voice "push…push…push…push…push…relax" to ensure consistent encouragement. The examiner will keep the dynamometer in place such that the transducer head will be aligned just proximal to the ulnar styloid process, matching the force exerted by the subject. The maximum of the three trials will be used for analyses. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Global rating of change scale (GROC) (both knee and shoulder) | Patient-perceived pain change using a global rating of change scale (GROC) based on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "Much better - a very important improvement" to "Much worse - an important aggravation" (not applicable at baseline) | 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Global rating of change scale (GROC) (both knee and shoulder) | Patient-perceived pain change using a global rating of change scale (GROC) based on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "Much better - a very important improvement" to "Much worse - an important aggravation" (not applicable at baseline) | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in a modified Borg's scale (Borg CR10) | Participant's rating of perceived exertion (RPE) using a modified Borg's scale (Borg CR10) immediately following the blood flow restriction or sham-blood flow restriction exercise session. The scale has been shown to be an valid alternate tool for estimating the excretion and intensity levels during resistance training. A printed version of the modified scale will be presented to the participants and will be explained that a very hard session would have a rating =7 out of 10 and a rating of 10 meant they were giving maximal effort and could not exert themselves any further. Accordingly, a light session may have a rating of Borg =2, a moderate session may have a rating of Borg >2-<5, and a hard session may have a rating of Borg =5-<7. | 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Pain during active shoulder abduction (0 to 180°) in standing in a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (shoulder) | Patients will rate their pain during active shoulder abduction (0 to 180°) in standing in a NPRS ranging from 0 to 10 | Baseline | |
Secondary | Pain during active shoulder abduction (0 to 180°) in standing in a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (shoulder) | Patients will rate their pain during active shoulder abduction (0 to 180°) in standing in a NPRS ranging from 0 to 10 | 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Pain during active shoulder abduction (0 to 180°) in standing in a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (shoulder) | Patients will rate their pain during active shoulder abduction (0 to 180°) in standing in a NPRS ranging from 0 to 10 | 1 hour |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04538508 -
Radiofrecuency and Supervised Exercise Versus Supervised Exercise in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03685812 -
Validity and Reliability of Autocad Software Assessment of JPS in PFPS
|
||
Completed |
NCT02873143 -
5 Year Follow-up of Adolescents With Knee Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02114294 -
Hip Strengthening Versus Quadriceps Based Training for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02243332 -
Dynamic Quadriceps Muscle Stimulation for Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01696162 -
Conventional Home Exercise Programs Versus Electronic Home Exercise Versus Artificial Intelligence "Virtual Therapy" for Anterior Knee Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01434966 -
Changes in Quadriceps Function Following Local or Distant Interventions in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05327569 -
The Efficacy of Myofascial Chain Release Techniques in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06060730 -
Measurement Properties of the Turkish Version of the Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis Subscale of the KOOS
|
||
Completed |
NCT03281421 -
Immediate Effects of Ankle Mobilization on Dorsiflexion Range of Motion in Women With Patellofemoral Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06130696 -
Clamshell Exercise in Patellofemoral Syndrome.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03201133 -
Clinical Subgroups in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
||
Completed |
NCT05959148 -
Adjuvant Effects of Monochromatic Infrared Energy in Rehabilitation of Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02646579 -
Effects of Dry Needling Using Spinal and Peripheral Sites Versus Peripheral Sites Only
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00978003 -
Vasti Control of Patellofemoral Kinematics in Asymptomatic Volunteer
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04631614 -
Addition Effect of the Ankle Manual Therapy to Muscle Strengthening Exercise in Women With Patellofemoral Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05383781 -
Effect of Short Foot Exercise in Treatment of Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05083897 -
Effect of Hip Adductors Isometric Contraction on Knee Extensors Isokinetic Torque in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03157271 -
The Addition of Dry Needling in the Treatment of Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02548988 -
Selective Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on VMO
|
N/A |