Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03462628 |
Other study ID # |
2015-SR-085 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 24, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
August 17, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2022 |
Source |
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The primary objective of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of two different AF
ablation strategies in older patients with paroxysmal AF: Pulmonary vein isolation alone
versus additional low-voltage substrate modification during sinus rhythm
Description:
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder. Catheter
ablation to the pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) electrically from the left atrium (LA) has
been shown to be an effective treatment for paroxysmal AF (PAF). The consensus is that PVI
alone is the main strategy for PAF ablation. Based on the results from our pilot study and
STABLE-SR trial, that low-voltage modification beyond CPVI is very promising for persistent
AF ablation. Whether the low voltage area modification combined with PVI improves outcomes is
unclear in older patients with PAF.
AIM OF THE STUDY: The primary objective of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of
two different AF ablation strategies in older patients with PAF: PVI alone versus additional
low-voltage substrate modification during sinus rhythm. The primary endpoint is freedom from
AF and/or ATs with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) at 12 months after a
single-ablation procedure. AF and/or AT occurring in the first 3 months after the ablation
(blanking period) was censored. Each atrial tachyarrhythmia episode lasts > 30 seconds
monitored by ECG, 24-Holter or 7 days-Holter was defined as recurrence. The secondary
endpoint are incidence of periprocedural complications, including stroke, PV stenosis,
cardiac perforation, esophageal injury and death; procedure time; fluoroscopy time (including
the total fluoroscopy time, during CPVI and after CPVI); the occurrence of the conversion
from AF to AT, and its relationship with long-term outcome; the scar distribution and the
relationship of success rate in older PAF patients.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a randomized, prospective, parallel, single-blind multicenter design.
The expected freedom from atrial fibrillation in older patients after one ablation procedure
was 75% for PVI. Previous study did not include a group assigned to isolation plus additional
low-voltage substrate modification during sinus rhythm, so freedom form AF for this procedure
was estimated from the literature at 85%. A log-rank test was used for sample-size
calculation. To test whether the isolation plus low-voltage substrate modification was
superior to isolation only. Then the 369 patients were needed, with a randomization ratio of
1:1, for the study to have a power of 90% at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05. Assuming a
dropout rate of 15%, we need 434 patients. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 fashion into one
of the investigation arms: CPVI plus low-voltage substrate modification in the left atrium
during SR and CPVI alone. Follow-up for these patients includes visits at 3 m, 6 m, 9 m, 12
m.