Parkinson Disease, Off Episodes Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Examine the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of APL-130277 in Levodopa Responsive Patients With Parkinson's Disease Complicated by Motor Fluctuations ("OFF" Episodes)
| Verified date | July 2020 |
| Source | Sunovion |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
A 12-week, prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, Phase 3 study in L-Dopa responsive PD patients with motor fluctuations ("OFF" episodes), designed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of APL-130277.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 141 |
| Est. completion date | December 11, 2017 |
| Est. primary completion date | December 11, 2017 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female = 18 years of age. - Clinical diagnosis of Idiopathic PD, consistent with UK Brain Bank Criteria. - Clinically meaningful response to L-Dopa with well-defined early morning "OFF" episodes, as determined by the Investigator. - Receiving stable doses of L-Dopa/carbidopa (immediate or CR) administered at least 4 times per day OR Rytary™ administered 3 times per day, for at least 4 weeks before the initial Screening Visit - No planned medication change(s) or surgical intervention anticipated during the course of study. - Patients must experience at least one well defined "OFF" episode per day with a total daily "OFF" time duration of = 2 hours during the waking day, based on patient self-assessment. - Stage III or less on the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale in the "ON" state. - MMSE score > 25. Exclusion Criteria: A patient will not be eligible for study entry if any of the following exclusion criteria are met: - Atypical or secondary parkinsonism. - Previous treatment with any of the following: a neurosurgical procedure for PD; continuous s.c. apomorphine infusion; or Duodopa/Duopa. - Treatment with any form of s.c. apomorphine within 7 days prior to the initial Screening Visit (SV1). Patients that stopped s.c. apomorphine for any reason other than systemic safety concerns or lack of efficacy may be considered. - Contraindications to APOKYN®, or hypersensitivity to apomorphine hydrochloride or any of the ingredients of APOKYN® (notably sodium metabisulfite); Tigan® (trimethobenzamide hydrochloride; patients from US sites only); or domperidone (patients from non-US sites only). - Participation in a clinical trial within 30 days prior to the initial Screening Visit (SV1). - Currently taking selective 5HT3 antagonists (i.e., ondansetron, granisetron, dolasetron, palonosetron, alosetron), dopamine antagonists (excluding quetiapine or clozapine) or dopamine depleting agents. - Drug or alcohol dependency in the past 12 months. - History of malignant melanoma. - Clinically significant medical, surgical, or laboratory abnormality in the opinion of the Investigator. - Major psychiatric disorder including, but not limited to, dementia, bipolar disorder, psychosis, or any disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, requires ongoing treatment that would make study participation unsafe or make treatment compliance difficult. - History of clinically significant hallucinations during the past 6 months. - History of clinically significant impulse control disorder(s). - Dementia that precludes providing informed consent or would interfere with participation in the study. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | UHN Toronto Western Hospital | Toronto | Ontario |
| United States | Emory University Department of Neurology | Atlanta | Georgia |
| United States | Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland |
| United States | University of Alabama, Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama |
| United States | Parkinsons Disease and Movement Disorders Center | Boca Raton | Florida |
| United States | University of Virginia, Adult Neurology | Charlottesville | Virginia |
| United States | Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois |
| United States | Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois |
| United States | University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio |
| United States | Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio |
| United States | QUEST Research Institute | Farmington Hills | Michigan |
| United States | The Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Institute | Fountain Valley | California |
| United States | UC Irvine Health Gottschalk Medical Plaza | Irvine | California |
| United States | Kansas University Medical Center - Department of Neurology | Kansas City | Kansas |
| United States | Evergreen Health | Kirkland | Washington |
| United States | University of Kentucky | Lexington | Kentucky |
| United States | Keck Medical Center at USC | Los Angeles | California |
| United States | University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine | Miami | Florida |
| United States | Columbia University Medical Center - Neurological Institute, Movement Disorders | New York | New York |
| United States | The Research Center of Southern California | Oceanside | California |
| United States | Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Muhammed Ali Parkinson and Movement Disorder CenterBarrow Neurological | Phoenix | Arizona |
| United States | Parkinson's Disease Treatment Center of Southwest Florida | Port Charlotte | Florida |
| United States | Raleigh Neurology Associates, P.A. | Raleigh | North Carolina |
| United States | Mayo Clinic Arizona | Scottsdale | Arizona |
| United States | Movement Disorders Center of Arizona | Scottsdale | Arizona |
| United States | USF Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center | Tampa | Florida |
| United States | Northern Michigan Neurology | Traverse City | Michigan |
| United States | The Movement Disorder Clinic of Oklahoma | Tulsa | Oklahoma |
| United States | MedStar Georgetown University Hospital | Washington | District of Columbia |
| United States | Henry Ford Hospital | West Bloomfield | Michigan |
| United States | Central DuPage Hospital - Neurodegenerative Clinic - Movement Disorders Center | Winfield | Illinois |
| United States | Wake Forest Baptist Health | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Sunovion |
United States, Canada,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean Change From Pre-Dose to 30 Minutes Post-Dose in The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III Motor Examination (MDS-UPDRS Part III) Score at Maintenance Visit 4 (MV4) - Week 12 | The Motor Function section (Part III) of the MDS-UPDRS was administered by the Investigator, and included 33 scores based on 18-items, each anchored with 5 responses: 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The scale range was from 0 to 132, with a lower score indicating better motor function and a higher score indicating more severe motor symptoms. The least square mean change in the MDS-UPDRS Part III score from pre-dose to 30 minutes post-dose at MV4 is presented. A negative change from pre-dose indicates an improvement. |
At t=0 (just prior to dosing) and t=30 minutes at MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With a Patient-related Full 'ON' Response Within 30 Minutes at MV4 - Week 12: Predicted Response Rate | A full 'ON' response was defined as a period of time where in the judgment of the patient the medication was providing full benefit with regard to mobility, stiffness, slowness and other PD features comparable to or better than that obtained with their standard dose of oral L-dopa and other anti-parkinsonian medications prior to beginning the study. Patients were asked if they attained a full 'ON' state anytime within 30 minutes of dosing. The predicted response rates are presented and were estimated using a generalized linear mixed model. | At t=30 minutes at MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With a Patient-related Full 'ON' Response Within 30 Minutes That Had a Duration of Effect of at Least 30 Minutes at MV4 - Week 12: Predicted Response Rate | A full 'ON' response was defined as a period of time where in the judgment of the patient the medication was providing full benefit with regard to mobility, stiffness, slowness and other PD features comparable to or better than that obtained with their standard dose of oral L-dopa and other anti-parkinsonian medications prior to beginning the study. The percentage of patients who attained a full 'ON' within 30 minutes of dosing, and whose duration from time when study medication began to have an effect lasted for at least 30 minutes were evaluated. The predicted response rates are presented and were estimated using a generalized linear mixed model. | At MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I): Percentage of Patients Who Improved at MV4 - Week 12 | During the PGI-I assessment the patient was asked to answer the question "Since starting study medication, how has your illness changed?" with 1 of the following responses: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse and 7 = very much worse. The percentage of patients who improved at MV4 (gave responses 1 - 3) are presented. |
At MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I): Percentage of Patients Who Improved at MV4 - Week 12 | During the CGI-I assessment the clinician using the question "Compared to his/her condition on baseline, how much has he/she changed?" provided 1 of the following responses: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse and 7 = very much worse. The percentage of patients who improved at MV4 (responses 1 - 3) are presented. |
At MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Screening Visit to MV4 (Week 12) in MDS-UPDRS Part II: Motor Aspects of Experience of Daily Living | Part II of the MDS-UPDRS assessed motor experiences of daily living and was self-administered by the patient. The MDS-UPDRS Part II score was calculated as the sum of the individual items of the MDS-UPDRS Part II questionnaire (items 2.1 - 2.13), and was based on 13-items, each anchored with 5 responses: 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The scale range was from 0 to 52, with a lower score indicating better motor function for daily living and a higher score indicating more severe motor symptoms. The mean change in the MDS-UPDRS Part II score from the screening visit to Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase is presented. A negative change indicates an improvement. |
At Screening Visit and at MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Mean Percentage of Instances Where a Full 'ON' Response Was Achieved at 30 Minutes Post-dose on the Home Dosing Diary Entries During the 2 Days Prior to MV4 - Week 12 | Patients self-administered their doses of randomized study medication in order to treat up to 5 'OFF' episodes per day and recorded the time of self-administration and the 'ON'/'OFF' status at 30 minutes post-dose in a home dosing diary. A full 'ON' response was defined as a period of time where in the judgment of the patient the medication was providing full benefit with regard to mobility, stiffness, slowness and other PD features comparable to or better than that obtained with their standard dose of oral L-dopa and other anti-parkinsonian medications prior to beginning the study. The percentage of instances in which a full 'ON' response was achieved at 30 minutes out of all recorded episodes was calculated and is presented, and the mean percentage is presented. |
2 days prior to MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Screening Visit to MV4 in the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index Score | The PDQ-39 was self-administered by the patient during screening and at each MV. The PDQ-39 assessed the impact of PD on the quality of life in the preceding month using 39-items, each anchored with 5 responses: Never, Occasionally, Sometimes, Often and Always. Items were grouped into 8 scales (Mobility, Activities of daily living, Emotional well-being, Stigma, Social support, Cognitions, Communication and Bodily discomfort) that were scored by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The PDQ-39 summary index score was derived by the sum of the 8 PDQ-39 scale scores divided by 8, yielding a score between 0 and 100. 0 indicates perfect health and 100 indicates worse health as assessed by the measure. A negative change indicates an improvement. | At Screening Visit and at MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Pre-Dose to 15 Minutes Post-Dose in the MDS-UPDRS Part III Score at MV4 - Week 12 | The Motor Function section (Part III) of the MDS-UPDRS was administered by the Investigator, and included 33 scores based on 18-items, each anchored with 5 responses: 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The scale range was from 0 to 132, with a lower score indicating better motor function and a higher score indicating more severe motor symptoms. The mean change in the MDS-UPDRS Part III score from pre-dose to 15 minutes post-dose at MV4 is presented. A negative change indicates an improvement. |
At t=0 (just prior to dosing) and t=15 minutes at MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). | |
| Secondary | Time From Dosing to When Study Medication Provided an Effect at MV4 - Week 12 | The time to effect at MV4 was described using the Kaplan-Meier method, including an estimate of the median time to effect and corresponding 95% confidence interval. | At MV4 (Week 12 of the Maintenance Treatment Phase). |