Parastomal Hernia Clinical Trial
— GRECCAR 07Official title:
Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses: a Randomized, Multicentric Study
Verified date | August 2020 |
Source | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to compare rates of hernia formation between colostomies created with no hernia preventing mesh versus colostomies created with a particular mesh.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 200 |
Est. completion date | October 20, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | October 20, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - The patient has given informed consent - The patient must be affiliated with a health insurance programme - The patient must be available for 24 months of follow-up - The patient requires a colostomy (primo-event, ie first colostomies only) Exclusion Criteria: - The patient is currently participating in another interventional study - The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study - The patient is under guardianship - The patient refuses to sign the consent - It is impossible to communicate information to the patient (does not read French) - The patient is pregnant - The patient is breastfeeding - There is a contra-indication for any treatment used in this study - The subject has already had a colostomy - The subject has peritonitis - The subject needs a colostomy for infectious reasons |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHRU de Besancon | Besancon | |
France | CHU de Bordeaux | Bordeaux | |
France | CHRU de Clermont Ferrand | Clermont Ferrand | |
France | APHP - Hôpital Beaujon | Clichy | |
France | Hôpital Albert Michallon, CHU de Grenoble | Grenoble | |
France | APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicêtre | Le Kremlin Bicêtre Cedex | |
France | Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Oscar Lambret | Lille | |
France | CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez | Lille Cedex | |
France | CHU de Lyon | Lyon | |
France | APHM - Hôpital La Timone Adultes | Marseille | |
France | Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Institut Paoli-Calmettes | Marseille | |
France | Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque | Montpellier | |
France | CHU de Nantes | Nantes | |
France | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes | Nîmes | |
France | APHP - Hôpital Lariboisière | Paris | |
France | APHP - Hôpital Saint-Antoine | Paris Cedex 12 | |
France | APHP - Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpetrière | Paris Cedex 13 | |
France | Hôpital Pontchailou | Rennes | |
France | CHU de Rouen | Rouen | |
France | Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Centre Paul Strauss | Strasbourg | |
France | CHU de Toulouse | Toulouse | |
France | CH de Vichy - Jacques Larin | Vichy |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Presence/absence of a peristomal hernia | The occurrence of peristomal hernias is determined in both groups every three months up until 24 months. The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam, and at 24 months by an additional radiology exam. The primary outcome concerns rates at 24 months, primo-events only. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Days of hospitalisation | The number of days spent in the hospital after the surgical intervention. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Operating time (minutes) | Day 1 | ||
Secondary | Estimation of blood loss during the operation (ml) | Day 1 | ||
Secondary | Was stomal repair necessary for the patient? yes/no | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Was relocation of the colostomy required? yes/no | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 24 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire Stoma-QOL | Validated assessment of quality of life. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire Stoma-QOL | Validated assessment of quality of life. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Questionnaire Stoma-QOL | Validated assessment of quality of life. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peri-operative complications | Day 1 | ||
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 9 months | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 15 months | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 18 months | |
Secondary | Pain around the colostomy | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site. | 21 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 9 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 15 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 18 months | |
Secondary | Abdominal pain | A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain. | 21 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 9 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 15 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 18 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of peristomal hernia | The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam. | 21 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 1 month | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 3 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 6 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 9 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 12 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 15 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 18 months | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of complications | Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration | 21 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 9 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 15 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 18 months | |
Secondary | Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac. | A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage. | 21 months | |
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | Day 1 | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 9 months | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 15 months | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 18 months | ||
Secondary | Pain medication consumption | 21 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | Day 1 | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 9 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 18 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 15 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy leaks per day | 21 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | Day 1 | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 9 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 15 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 18 months | ||
Secondary | Number of colostomy sac changes per day | 21 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | Day 1 | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 9 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 15 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 18 months | ||
Secondary | Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no | 21 months | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 9 months | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 15 months | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 18 months | ||
Secondary | Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no | 21 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 9 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 15 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 18 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 21 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh? | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 9 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 15 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 18 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 21 months | ||
Secondary | Ablation of the mesh: yes/no | 24 months | ||
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 9 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 15 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 18 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 21 months | |
Secondary | Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinician | The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Duration of postoperative fever (hours) | 10 days | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of postoperative fever > 37.2°C | Day 1 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT05514600 -
Fascial Defect Closure for Minimally Invasive Parastomal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04311333 -
Endostomal Three-dimensional Ultrasonography for Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06077318 -
Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia
|
||
Completed |
NCT00908661 -
Effectiveness of a Lightweight Mesh in the Laparoscopic Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04282473 -
Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh
|
||
Completed |
NCT03792243 -
Outcomes After Parastomal Hernia Repair
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT01955278 -
Role of Prosthetic Mesh in Preventing Parastomal Hernias
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00641342 -
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia by Primary Mesh Insertion
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT04966065 -
Evaluation of the Parietex TM Parastomal No Hole Mesh for Repair of Parastomal Hernias in End-colostomies
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04440514 -
Endoscopic Preperitoneal Parastomal Hernia Repair (ePauli Repair)
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04950140 -
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Parastomal Hernia of the Oncology Patient
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02489175 -
Stomaplasty Ring (KoringTM) for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03667287 -
Stoma Hernia Intraperitoneal Full-Thickness Skin
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01722565 -
Prospective Study of the Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02368873 -
the Use of a IPOM Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00917995 -
Trial Concerning the Frequency of Parastomal Hernia With or Without a Mesh
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02233465 -
Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01484743 -
Risk Factors for Morbidity After Parastomal Hernia Repair
|
||
Completed |
NCT00509054 -
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04187235 -
Laparascopic Keyhole vs Sugarbaker Repair in Parastomal Hernia
|