View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Neoplasms.
Filter by:The question being asked in this study is: Will patients with advanced pancreatic cancer live significantly longer if they are treated with a combination of Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na than if they are treated with Gemcitabine alone? There are two parts to this study. In the first part of the study, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be assigned by chance either to the group that will be treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na (about 100 patients will be in this group) or, to the group that will be treated with Gemcitabine only (about 50 patients will be in this group). How long patients survive in the 2 groups will be compared. If it looks like there is no difference between the groups, the study will stop. If it looks like patients in the group that were treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na survive longer, the study will continue into a second part where more patients will be treated in order to confirm and better understand the findings of the first part of the study.
The investigators propose a randomized, controlled trial of stapled pancreatic transection versus mesh reinforced stapled pancreatic transection. For the duration of the study period, participating surgeons will utilize a standardized staple technique. Either a reabsorbable polytrimethylene carbonate mesh (SEAMGUARD®) or reabsorbable strips of bovine pericardium (PERI-STRIPS DRY®) will be used to reinforce the stapled pancreatic transection line in the test group. In order to have a uniform test method, the investigators will utilize a laparoscopic stapling device for both open and laparoscopic procedures and a uniform staple size (4.8mm).
EUS-guided FNA has been proved to be a safe and useful method for tissue sampling of gastrointestinal track lesions and other organ lesions including mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymph nodes, pancreas and hepatobiliary tree. The usefulness of EUS-FNA depends on several factors. For example, experience of the endosonographers, adequate sampling, sample preparing, accurate interpretation by the cytopathologist and on-site cytopathology interpretation. However, in many hospitals, no cytopathologist can be present during EUS-FNA. Therefore, determining appropriate methods to obtain and prepare EUS-guided FNA are important to make correct a diagnosis without on-site cytopathologist. Suction with a self-retracting 10-mL syringe will likely bring in more cellularity but also more blood. Some endosonographers use no suction, others use constant suction. Usually specimen is expelled from a needle with pushing the stylet into the needle. But use of the stylet during EUS-FNA is difficult and time consuming process. Injecting air was not recommended, because of spraying out uncontrollably, increasing risk of air artifact and specimen clotting. However, there is no further study which one is the appropriate, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air until now. The hypothesis and aim of the prospective randomized controlled trials are as follows: First hypothesis: There was no difference in the adequacy, cellularity, bloodiness, contamination, air artifact in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air. Aim #1 : To compare the adequacy, cellularity, bloodiness, contamination, air artifact in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air. Second hypothesis: There was no difference in sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and statistical agreement in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air. Aim #2 : To compare the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and statistical agreement in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air.
This study will evaluate the local control rate as well as acute and late toxicity rates of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as trabectedin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well trabectedin works in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer after first-line chemotherapy.
This is a Phase I, multi-center, open-label, dose-escalation study of DMUC5754A administered as a single agent by intravenous (IV) infusion to patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or unresectable pancreatic cancer.
RATIONALE: Studying samples of blood from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors identify and learn more about biomarkers related to cancer. It may also help doctors predict how well patients will respond to treatment. PURPOSE: This research trial is studying the relationship between vitamin D biomarkers and survival in blood samples from patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Malignant biliary obstruction is a common clinical condition caused by various malignancies. Currently,biliary stent implantation guided either by fluoroscopy or endoscopy has become the most important methods for relieving malignant biliary obstruction. However, the benefit for the survival of the patients with palliation of the stent treatment is limited because no therapeutic effects on process of the tumor itself by a stent implantation. Encouraged by the success of 125I esophageal stent in esophageal carcinoma, a novel biliary stent loaded with 125I radioactive seeds has been developed in our institute. After ex vivo and in vivo evaluations for the delivery system, the investigators prospectively compare the responses to treatment with this radiation biliary stent, versus the conventional biliary SEMS in patient with malignant biliary obstruction.
Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions remains a difficult problem in clinical practice. At present, the treatment planning in pancreatic cystic neoplasms is significantly restricted by the limited preoperative diagnosis. Ultrasonography (US), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the conventional modalities in imaging of pancreatic cystic neoplasms, but by these methods the diagnostic accuracy still remains compromised. Furthermore, recently encouraging results have been obtained in pancreatic cystic neoplasms using 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) The aim of the current project is to evaluate the possibility to enhance the diagnostic accuracy by using the combined 18F-FDG-PET-CT imaging in patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms by combining PET-CT with MRI and MDCT.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiation therapy given in five fractions (30 Gray in 5 fractions) followed by gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.