View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Neoplasms.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine in Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic cancer represents the most lethal of the common malignancies with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. For patients who are eligible for potentially curative resection, despite mortality and morbidity rates after surgery have improved, the recurrence rate is up to 85% within 2 years. Data from clinical trials indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy enhances 5-year survival to ~25% for patients who have undergone surgery to remove their tumor; and gemcitabine is the standard regimen of chemotherapy. Metformin is the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Literatures reported that metformin might inhibit tumor growth by blocking some enzymes needed for cell growth. Some retrospective studies have revealed that diabetic patients taking metformin were less likely to develop pancreatic cancer. Additionally, pancreatic cancer patients treated with metformin showed a better survival than those without metformin. In this study, the researchers intend to investigate the activity and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and metformin in treating patients with pancreatic cancer that have removed by surgery.
This is an open-label Phase 1b dose-escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability, and PK of vantictumab when combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine.
Test the safety, immune response and efficacy of GVAX pancreas vaccine (with cyclophosphamide) and CRS-207 compared to chemotherapy or CRS-207 alone in adults with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
This is a randomized study of surgery plus chemical nerve block versus surgery plus placebo for pain control in subjects with pancreatic cancer.
The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the diagnostic utility of two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis) in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Histologic diagnosis (biopsies) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. In order to do this the investigators will ask study participants to have a small volume of fluid obtained from the bile duct sent for additional testing at RedPATH. In some patients additional brushings will be obtained for FISH testing (this adds <2 minutes to ERCP and only associated risk is increased procedure duration). The investigators hypothesize that the use of cytology +DNA analysis has a higher sensitivity and accuracy when compared to cytology +FISH in patients with biliary strictures. Primary aim: To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of the two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis). Histologic diagnosis (histology from biopsy or cytology for fine needle aspiration) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. Secondary aims: 1. To evaluate the diagnostic yield of malignancy when all three techniques (cytology, FISH and DNA analysis) are used. 2. To evaluate the added value of biliary forceps biopsies, when used in conjunction with cytology, FISH and DNA analysis.
Title: The role of early systematic best palliative care versus on request palliative care consultation during standard oncologic treatment for patients with advanced gastric or pancreatic cancers: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Description of Study Treatment: 1. Interventional arm Patients will receive standard oncologic care and will be assigned to early systematic best palliative care. They will meet a member of the palliative care team within 2 weeks after enrolment. Thereafter, they shall be visited by a palliative care team member every 2 weeks until death. Patients assigned to this experimental arm will be evaluated if the total of palliative care visits between T0 (day of enrollment) and T1 (12±3 weeks) is ≥3. Palliative care visits and intervention has to be oriented by the General guidelines for palliative care: specific attention will be paid to assessing physical and psychosocial symptoms, establishing goals of care, assisting decision making regarding treatment, and coordinating care on the basis of the individual needs of the patients. The doctor expert in palliative care, with regular visits in the experimental arm, must be a physician dedicated full time to palliative care, that can directly prescribe drugs and other interventions, and with a particular attention to physical, psychological, and spiritual needs. Palliative care doctor must have the possibility to decide about organizational arrangements. He has to perform the palliative care visit according to Temel indications. 2. Standard arm Patients will receive standard oncologic care and will be assigned to on request palliative care consultation. They will be not scheduled to meet with the palliative care service unless a meeting will be requested by the patients, the family, or the oncologist. After the time of evaluation (T1) patients will be followed by the palliative care services as needed. Patient completes QoL (Quality of Life) and mood questionnaires at baseline and at 12 weeks ± 3. Patients will receive standard antineoplastic treatment in both arms of the study according to best clinical practice in each participating centre.
Novel predictive markers are needed to determine treatment efficacy in pancreatic cancer at an early stage. Preferably, these markers could be determined non-invasively and provide insight into the biology of pancreatic cancer. Several MR techniques can serve for this purpose. However, optimalisation of these techniques is needed and their reproducibility should be assessed.
Several studies have shown that tumour hypoxia may have a negative impact on the outcome of anticancer treatment. Assessment of tumor hypoxia at baseline or shortly after start of treatment may serve as a predictive marker to determine treatment efficacy at an early stage. Preferably, such an assessment is performed in vivo and non-invasively.Non-invasive imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using the 2-nitroimidazole nucleoside analogue, 3-18F-fluoro-2-(4-((2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1- yl)propan-1-ol (18F-HX4), was tested as a new marker of tumor hypoxia. Before hypoxia-measurements can be clinically implemented for response prediction, the reproducibility of the technique should be assessed for each specific tumor type. Knowledge of reproducibility is needed to determine what change in parameters between two examinations can be considered relevant in an individual patient. Assessment of reproducibility becomes even more important in early response monitoring since the changes in the tumor induced by the treatment may be smaller during the treatment compared to response monitoring after completion of treatment. Also, as image quality of 18F-HX4-PET increases with increasing time intervals after injection, determination of the optimal time point for measurement of hypoxia is warranted.
Primary Objective: To determine the rate of downstaging to resectability in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX and SBRT as preoperative therapy. Secondary Objective(s): 1. To assess the disease-free-survival, overall survival, time to recurrence and site of recurrence in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer receiving preoperative FOLFIRINOX followed by SBRT 2. To investigate the safety and tolerability of FOLFIRINOX and SBRT in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer 3. To determine the radiologic and pathological response associated with preoperative SBRT and FOLFIRINOX therapy 4. To assess quality of life through and after treatment using the FACT-Hep questionnaire