View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Neoplasms.
Filter by:The investigators hypothesized that with the administration of the nutritional supplement Ocoxin-Viusid® is expected to improve the quality of life and enhance tolerance to chemotherapy in at least 70% of patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, treated at the "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Surgical Clinical Hospital. Phase II clinical trial, open, multicenter, nonrandomized.
PanFAM-1 is a clinical study for early detection of pancreatic cancer in high-risk groups. The goals of the study are to assess the performance and diagnostic accuracy of the IMMray™ PanCan-d test compared to standard-of-care imaging.
We used the SEER database to analyze the data of patients with PDAC. The database includes patients of 18 registries in the USA from 1973-2013All the malignant cases were followed-up annually to determine vital status. The aim of Our study is to make clearly the long-term survival of younger (age <80 years) and elderly (age ≥80 years) pancreatic cancer patients underwent PD. Sec-ond, find out the risk factors of poor prognosis in elderly patients.
Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). A Danish phase II study.
This research study is evaluating a new type of pancreatic cancer vaccine called "Personalized Neoantigen Cancer Vaccine" as a possible treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of the clinical study is evaluating the safety, tolerability and partial efficacy of the personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine in the treatment of Chinese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, so as to provide a new personalized therapeutic strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer patients. It is known that cancer patients have mutations (changes in genetic material) that are specific to an individual patient and tumor. These mutations can cause the tumor cells to produce proteins that appear very different from the body's own cells. It is possible that these proteins used in a vaccine may induce strong immune responses, which may help the participant's body fight any tumor cells that could cause the cancer to come back in the future. The study will examine the safety of the vaccine when given at several different time points and will examine the participant's blood cells for signs that the vaccine induced an immune response.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is usually diagnosed at a late stage when it is incurable, thereby limiting treatment to palliative care. Chemotherapy is one of the standard palliative care options. Due to the availability of different regimens with varying degrees of benefits and risks, clinicians and patients with advanced pancreatic cancer usually discuss treatment options in order to arrive at the most appropriate chemotherapy regimen for the patient. The use of information tools has produced positive results in explaining the benefits and risks of different treatment options for diseases like stage IV lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and colorectal cancer. However, there is no such tool for people with advanced pancreatic cancer. With over 80% of people with pancreatic cancer being diagnosed in the advanced stage, it would be beneficial to enhance effective decision-making with respect to treatment at this challenging time of the disease progression. The aim of this research is to investigate the potential of a web-based information tool to support decision-making about treatment options for people who have been diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer. A multiphase mixed methods design has been adopted for this research study. The identified phases are: (1) systematic review and network meta-analysis of reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced pancreatic cancer; (2) focus groups/personal interviews with clinicians, and semi-structured interviews with patients and their relatives; (3) web-based information tool development; and (4) pilot test of the developed information tool with clinicians, patients, and relatives of patients
Anastomotic leakage of the pancreatojejunostomy is often discovered with considerable delay, causing severe peritonitis, hemorrhage due to erosion of vessels, sepsis, and death. Microdialysis catheters can detect focal inflammation and ischemia, and has a potential for early detection of anastomotic leakage. This observational study will examine if monitoring with microdialysis catheters can detect anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy earlier than current standard of care.
The aim of this study is to investigate the short-term effect and tolerability BP-C1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who has undergone guideline-recommended chemotherapy.
Rationale: Until now there are no prospective studies comparing the 22 gauge and 25 gauge side-fenestrated and fork-tip needles. In the present study we will compare the two types of needles in terms of histological yield for the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). Moreover diagnostic accuracy and the number of passes necessary to achieve the maximum diagnostic and histological yield, and safety will be investigated. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the histologic retrieval rate of two different EUS-FNB needles of the same caliber (22 or 25 gauge). The passes will be 3 for each patient. Study design: Randomized monocentric trial. Study population: Patients ≥18 years old, referred for EUS-guided tissue sampling of a solid pancreatic mass. Intervention: EUS-guided tissue acquisition by mean EUS-FNB, using one of the following FNB needles: side-fenestrated 22 gauge, side-fenestrated 25 gauge, fork-tip 22 gauge or fork-tip 25 gauge. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main endpoint is the histologic yield (defined as the percentage of a tissue core of at least 550 micron at the greatest axis), obtained at each of the 3 needle passes. Secondary endpoints include: i) safety; ii) concordance between macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) and histopathological evaluation ; iii) Accuracy using 1, 2 or 3 passes.
Retrospective, multicenter study including pts with metastatic pancreatic cancer who started first-line treatment with napaclitaxel plus Gemcitabine between December 2013 and June 2015 according to the routine practice. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for the total sample and the exploratory subgroups based on treatment and clinical characteristics of the study pts.