View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Cancer.
Filter by:This study aims to find out: 1. The tolerability of Cabotamig (ARB202) in adults with advanced solid gastrointestinal tumors who failed the standard treatment. People can participate if their tumor has the CDH17 marker. 2. To find out how study drug is broken down in the body 3. To know the effects of the study drug on the tumor.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a deadly disease and surgical resection of the tumor is the only hope of cure. Approximately 20-25% of the PC patients are candidates for intended curative resection, but despite microscopically radical resection the majority of patients will have recurrent disease within 2 years. This indicates that most patients will harbour non-detected (i.e. occult) cancer cells at the time of resection. Studies suggest that free tumor cells in the peritoneum and in the blood are part of this occult disease burden, and that patients with such findings should not be operated but treated as having metastatic disease. However, the exact incidence of these tumor cells in an unselected cohort of patients undergoing pancreatic resection is unknown, and the potential impact on postoperative survival is also uncertain. In recent years, molecular biomarkers are increasingly being regarded as both predictive and prognostic tools for cancer patients. This study will use the most optimal available methods to investigate the incidence of biomarkers for tumor cells in the peritoneum and blood in PC patients, and to relate these findings to the final outcome of the resected patients. This project has become highly relevant since new treatment methods (i.e. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)) may be used to eradicate free tumor cells. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that PC patients with positive peritoneal cytology (Cy+) had a significant poorer survival than patients with negative peritoneal cytology (Cy-) (HR 3.18), and the authors concluded that Cy+ patients should not undergo surgery. This conclusion was supported by a significant lower overall survival and a higher peritoneal recurrence rate after resection of Cy+ patients when compared to Cy- patients. Agreement that Cy+ in resectable PDAC is a negative predictor of prognosis came from another recent meta-analysis and systematic review. However, this study also indicated that the median OS was worse in patients without than in those with resection among patients with Cy+, thereby emphasizing need of further careful assessment of indications for radical resection in Cy+ patients. KRAS mutations have been detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood (liquid biopsies) from patients with metastatic PC, and ctDNA is considered a marker of poor prognosis. Similar, KRAS mutations were found in the plasma of one-third of patients with a resectable tumor, and ctDNA positive (ctDNA+) patients had a significantly poorer overall survival (13.6 months vs 27.6 months, p<0.0001). Similar conclusions were drawn in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, while one study failed to confirm these results. The detection of KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA has also been identified as a prognostic biomarker in PC patients. If looking at studies including all stages of PC patients, the prevalence of KRAS mutations in liquid biopsies was 40.8%, and these mutations had a negative impact on overall survival with a HR of 3.16. Different ctDNA detection methods have been used, however the recent introduction of digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), a new robust PCR method for quantifying low-abundance point mutations in cell-free circulating DNA, shows promising results and offers increased sensitivity and reproducibility relative to quantitative PCR (qPCR). The treatment of resectable, locally advanced and metastatic PC has changed significantly over the past few years. New chemotherapy regimens have improved survival in metastatic PC, and these regimens (+/- radiation therapy) are presently being tested in both resectable and locally advanced PC with promising preliminary results. In theory, these new regimens may be potentially effective against ctDNA in PC patients, whereas the effect on peritoneal lavage positive (PLF+) PC patients is more speculative due to the low intraperitoneal concentrations of systemic chemotherapy. However, the latter problem may be solved by using Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) which allows better intraperitoneal distribution, concentration and accumulation of chemotherapy, without the systemic side effects. It may be speculated that the highly sensitive ddPCR of KRAS may be a better tool for PLF+ detection when focusing on PC patients, as up to 95% of these harbour mutations in this gene. So far, only very few studies used PCR to evaluate KRAS mutations in PLF in PC patients. Main study aims are: 1. We aim to investigate the incidence of PLF+ and KRAS ctDNA in the blood from an unselected cohort of PC patients scheduled for attempted curative surgery. 2. Secondly, we will study the prognostic impact of PLF+ and KRAS ctDNA positivity in PC patients.
Detection of Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers Using Breath Analysis - Feasibility Study
There is no a clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. There is a potential role for neoadjuvant therapy to treat micrometastatic disease with chemotherapy, as well as for the treatment of local disease with radiotherapy. The investigators evaluated the safety and efficacy of induction FOLFIRINOX followed by a high weekly dose of gemcitabine concurrent to radiation therapy in patients with borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).
This is a phase I clinical study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CAR-T in patients with CEA-positive advanced malignant solid tumors, and to obtain the maximum tolerated dose of CAR-T and phase II Recommended dose.
This is a Phase 1 dose-finding study of FT536 given in combination with a monoclonal antibody following lymphodepletion in participants with advanced solid tumors. The study will consist of a dose-escalation stage and an expansion stage where participants will be enrolled into indication-specific cohorts.
To learn if piflufolastat F18 can be used in imaging scans for patients with breast cancer, HCC, or pancreatic cancer
An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Dose-Exploration Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Preliminary Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of CT048 in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors
This is a prospective, randomized study designed to compare genotype-guided dosing to usual care in patients with pancreas cancer and colorectal cancer who are UGT1A1 intermediate metabolizers (*1/*28) (heterozygotes) and usual UGT metabolizers (*1/*1). All patients will be assessed for UGT1A1 genotype at screening and those with intermediate or usual UGT1A1 genotypes (*1/*28, *1/*1) will be randomized to genotype-guided dosing versus usual care.
This study includes participants with pancreatic cancer who are undergoing genetic testing at Invitae related to their diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Our goal in this study is two-fold. First, we would like to research whether any inherited changes in genes may be associated with pancreatic cancer. Second, we would like to learn more about patient experiences with genetic testing, such as patient understanding of the testing, health-related actions taken (or planned to take) as a result of testing, communication and action of family members based on test results, and psychological impact of testing. This research study involves allowing collection of tumor tissue (from a prior biopsy and/or surgery), a blood sample, and sending surveys to participants for their opinion on the impact of the genetic testing as well as clinicians for relevant baseline and medical history information.