Evaluating the Manage My Pain App in Pain Clinics

Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluating the Manage My Pain App in Pain Clinics

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05946239
• Other study ID #: Pro00126058
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 10, 2023
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: University of Alberta
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Chronic Pain is one of the most common reasons adults seek medical care, and has been linked to restrictions in mobility and daily activities, dependence on opioids, anxiety and depression, and poor perceived health or reduced quality of life. Chronic Pain Clinics are an effective solution, however, the resources available and investments have fallen behind the growing needs of patients. Local waitlists have thousands of patients with wait times between 1 to 3 years, with many receiving little to no specialized support while waiting. Tools and technology that can help patients and healthcare providers understand and manage the patients' pain are needed for the effectiveness of the healthcare system. In response to this problem, the Manage My Pain (MMP) App, which allows patients to log daily reflections of functionality, pain, and medication use; as well as, provide educational resources is a potential support for patients on the waitlist. This log is intended to support the patient understanding and management of their pain, and share their reports with their circle of care. This study will assess the impact of MMP on waitlist patients' health outcomes compared to a control group of waitlist patients over 60 days.

Description:

Chronic Pain is one of the most common reasons adults seek medical care and has been linked to restrictions in mobility and daily activities, dependence on opioids, anxiety, depression, and poor perceived health or reduced quality of life. Currently, local pain clinic waitlists have thousands of patients with wait times between 1 to 3 years, with many receiving little to no specialized support while waiting for an appointment. To address this problem, this study assesses the impact of the MMP App to support the health and medication use of patients on the waitlist. Using this approach patients on the waitlist can use this app to report their pain, functionality, reflections, and medication use, as well as read educational resources about pain management. This study tests the effectiveness of the MMP App versus a control group (i.e., standard practice) on health outcomes and mediation use over 60 days in a randomized control trial (RCT). The primary outcomes are pain, anxiety, pain self-efficacy, and quality of life. Secondary outcome is medication usage. Researchers will use descriptive and regression analysis to assess the data collected.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 196
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 18 years or older
• On the Calgary Pain Clinic waitlist

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants were excluded if they did not meet any of the above criteria
• Patients declining or unable to complete the consent process for the study
• No internet access
• No access to a device or computer to display the app/website

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain

Intervention

Other:
• Manage My Pain App
This digital application helps patients measure, track, and manage chronic pain, functionality, and medication use. MMP can also be used to share patient pain experiences with their circle of care via reports and offers educational resources for patients.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Calgary Chronic Pain Centre	Calgary	Alberta

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Alberta	Alberta Health services, Ontario Bioscience Innovation Organization

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (7)

Chiarotto A, Vanti C, Cedraschi C, Ferrari S, de Lima E Sa Resende F, Ostelo RW, Pillastrini P. Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Short Forms in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. J Pain. 2016 Jun;17(6):707-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 11. — View Citation

Dube MO, Langevin P, Roy JS. Measurement properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in populations with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain Rep. 2021 Dec 21;6(4):e972. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000972. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec. — View Citation

Finch AP, Brazier JE, Mukuria C. What is the evidence for the performance of generic preference-based measures? A systematic overview of reviews. Eur J Health Econ. 2018 May;19(4):557-570. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0902-x. Epub 2017 May 30. — View Citation

Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1. — View Citation

Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Margo McCaffery Alexander Beebe Mosby Yearbook UK pound17.25 0 7234 1992 2. Nurs Stand. 1994 Dec 7;9(11):55. doi: 10.7748/ns.9.11.55.s69. — View Citation

Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, McMillan D. Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar-Apr;39:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 18. — View Citation

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Levels (EQ5D5L)	EQ5D5L is a short descriptive questionnaire and a visual analogue scale that are simple to complete and assess five dimensions of quality of life including: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety and depression (EuroQol, 2019). Each quality of life dimension will be assessed according to the following five level response scale, which varies in degree of severity from: no problem, light problem, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to / extreme problems (EuroQol, 2019). The respondent will be asked to select the response item that most appropriately matches their current state (EuroQol, 2019). The single item score for each dimension is used assess the dimension, rather than a composite score. This instrument has been proven to be valid, reliable, and responsive in numerous conditions and populations (EuroQol, 2019; Finch et al., 2018).	60 days
Primary	Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)	The GAD-7 is a brief self-report assessment of anxiety severity for clinical practice and research (Spitzer et al., 2006). The GAD-7 consists of 7-items assessing anxiety on a four-point scale with response options including: not at all (score=0), several days (score=1), more than half the days (score=2), and nearly every day (score=3). To obtain the GAD-7 score, all scores are added to develop a total anxiety score. A score of 0 to 4 = minimal anxiety, 5 to 9 = mild anxiety, 10 to 14 = moderate anxiety, and a score greater than 15 = severe anxiety (Plummer et al., 2016). To screen for anxiety disorders, a score of 8 or greater represents a reasonable cut-point for identifying probable cases of generalized anxiety disorder (Plummer, et al 2016). The GAD-7 has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid tool to detect generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006).	60 days
Primary	Pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale)	The Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11 point scale that asks patients to identify the number between 0 (no pain at all) and 10 (the worst pain ever possible) that fits their pain intensity (McCaffery & Beebe, 1989).	60 days
Primary	Pain self-efficacy (PSEQ-4)	PSEQ-4 is an instrument to assess pain self-efficacy for clinical and research purposes (Chiarotto et al., 2016). The PSEQ-4 includes four items scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from not at all confident (score=0) to completely confident (score=6). Pain self-efficacy is calculated by summing the scores to determine a total score ranging from 0 to 24 (Chiarotto et al., 2016). High scores indicate greater pain self-efficacy. A systematic review has found that the PSEQ-4 has demonstrated excellent validity, reliability, and responsiveness among chronic lower back pain patients (Dubé et al., 2021). The PSEQ-4 may replace the full PSEQ and have similar responsiveness (Chiarotto et al., 2016).	60 days
Secondary	Medication Usage	A medication usage questionnaire used in pain clinics was modified with clinicians for this study. The survey asks if any of the listed medication (i.e.,Tramadol, Acetaminophen/ Codeine (Tylenol No 3, Hydromorphone, Hydromorphone Contin, Oxycodone 5mg/ Acetaminophen 325mg (Percocet), Oxycodone 5mg/Naloxone 10mg (Targin), Oxycodone, Oxycontin, Codeine, Morphine, Morphine Contin, Oxycodone, Oxycontin, Methadone, Fentanyl, Buprenorphine, Other Opioid) were taken in the last 7 days. If the medication was taken, the dose and frequency of administration was recorded.	60 days

External Links

•   EuroQol Research Foundation. (2019). EQ5D5L User Guide