Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Sustained-release Paracetamol in Subjects With Osteoarthritis
| Verified date | April 2016 |
| Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of the study is to determine whether paracetamol 1000 mg sustained-release (SR) tablets administered orally, twice daily are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 1517 |
| Est. completion date | February 2016 |
| Est. primary completion date | February 2016 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 40 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female participants between 40 and 80 years of age - Diagnosis of moderate to moderately-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of either the knee or hip with respect to the following: - Pain in one knee/hip over 3 months immediately before screening visit - Use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen (paracetamol) or any other analgesic for 3 or more days per week for at least 3 months prior to screening visit - Clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis of knee/hip for minimum 6 month duration prior to screening visit - Therapeutic benefit with acetaminophen use with a score of = 1 on 5-point categorical scale - Radiological evidence of = Grade 2 osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic criteria - Increased WOMAC Pain Subscale score of at least 20 % following untreated run-in period - Moderate to moderately-severe self-reported pain on a 5-point categorical scale following untreated run-in period - Historical self-reported positive therapeutic benefit with paracetamol use for osteoarthritis pain relief Exclusion Criteria: - History of surgery or major trauma to the study joint - Clinically significant signs or symptoms of inflammation upon completion of run-in period - Required ongoing use of analgesic therapy for other indications, anticoagulants, psychotherapeutic agents, aspirin at daily doses greater than 325 mg, statin-class hypolipidemic agents at doses that have not been stabilized, or other treatments know to interfere with pain perception - History of hepatic or renal or liver or biliary disease or gastrointestinal surgery - Participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 times Upper Limit Normal (2xULN) and bilirubin > 1.5 times Upper Limit Normal (1.5xULN) (However, if direct bilirubin is <35% and fractioned, isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable) - Other arthritis type, fibromyalgia or collagen vascular disease or secondary OA of study joint or chronic pain condition |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Altoona | Pennsylvania |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Anaheim | California |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Bellevue | Nebraska |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Birmingham | Alabama |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Brandon | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Brooklyn | New York |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Buffalo | New York |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Carmichael | California |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Chandler | Arizona |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Chicago | Illinois |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Clearwater | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Crestview Hills | Kentucky |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Dayton | Ohio |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Duncansville | Pennsylvania |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Edgewater | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Evanston | Illinois |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Fresno | California |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Hartsdale | New York |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Hialeah | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Hialeah | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Hickory | North Carolina |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Homestead | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Huntsville | Alabama |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Jupiter | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Miami | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Miami | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Miami | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Mount Pleasant | South Carolina |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | New Orleans | Louisiana |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | North Hollywood | California |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Oklahoma | Oklahoma |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Oldsmar | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Omaha | Nebraska |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Orlando | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Oviedo | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Plano | Texas |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Port Orange | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Prairie Village | Kansas |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Saint Louis | Missouri |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | San Diego | California |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Savannah | Georgia |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Smithfield | Pennsylvania |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | South Miami | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Toledo | Ohio |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Watertown | Massachusetts |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | West Palm Beach | Florida |
| United States | GSK Investigational Site | Wichita | Kansas |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| GlaxoSmithKline |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean change from baseline in Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Pain over 12 weeks of treatment | Mean change from baseline for the 5-question WOMAC pain subscale will be measured periodically throughout the 12-week treatment period via 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0= never, 100= always. The mean changes of all time points will be summed together to determine the mean change from baseline over 12 weeks. | Over 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean change from baseline for WOMAC Pain subscales, WOMAC Stiffness subscale, WOMAC Physical Function, and WOMAC Total Index | The 5-question WOMAC Pain subscale, 2-question WOMAC Stiffness subscale, and 17-question WOMAC Function subscale will each be measured using independent 100mm VAS where 0= never, 100= always. The mean of each time point will be calculated separately for each subscale. The 24-question WOMAC Total Index will be derived by combining the values for each of the three WOMAC subscales. The mean of the 24-question WOMAC Total Index will be derived for each time point. | After 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean change from baseline in Daily Pain, Daily Stiffness, and Daily Pain + Stiffness | Participants will assess their daily pain and stiffness each morning (upon awakening), afternoon, and evening during the 12-week treatment period using an independent 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). The mean of pain, mean of stiffness, and summed mean of pain + stiffness (composite) will be calculated. Changes from baseline will be assessed periodically and over the entire 12-week treatment period. | Daily over 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART) | PGART will be accessed by a questionnaire using a 5-point categorical scale, ranging from 0 (None/No good at all/Ineffective) to 4 (Excellent/Ideal response/Virtually pain free). Mean PGART scores will be calculated periodically of the 12 week treatment period. | After 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean change from baseline in Global Patient Assessment of Arthritis (GPAOA) | Participants will perform an instantaneous GPAOA via a 100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (best ever) to 100 (worst ever) periodically during the 12 week treatment period. | After 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Responder rate (%) | The responder rate will be estimated improvement in response to therapy by combining the scores from the WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, and PGART assessments over the 12-week treatment period for each participant. A participant will be considered a "responder" if his/her improvement satisfies at least one of the two criteria:- High improvement: mean change from baseline through week 12 that represents at least 50% decrease in WOMAC Pain or at least 60% decrease in WOMAC Physical Function. Moderate improvement: mean change from baseline through week 12 with fulfillment of at least two of the following criteria's: at least 30 % improvement in WOMAC Pain and/or at least 20% improvement in WOMAC Physical Function and/or; at least 25% improvement in GPAOA. | Over 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean Use of Rescue Medication | The mean number of doses of rescue medications taken throughout the 12-week treatment period will be calculated. | After 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean change from baseline in Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI) | Sleep Problem Index (SPI) will be calculated as mean of three CPSI questions: CPSI-1-'Trouble falling asleep': How often the participant had trouble falling asleep? , CPSI-2-'Awakening due to pain at night': How often the subject was awakened by pain during the night, CPSI-3-Awakening due to pain in the morning': How often the participant was awakened by pain in the morning? The participants will respond to these questions via 100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (never) to 100 (always). | After 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Frequency of Adverse events (AEs) | AEs will be recorded for all participants who receive at least one dose of blinded study medication. The severity of AEs and their relationship to the blinded study medication will be coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and summarized based on MedDRA system organ class and preferred terms. AE severity will be graded on a 3-point scale (Mild = Easily tolerated/Causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with normal everyday activities; Moderate = Sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities; Severe = Any event that prevents normal everyday activities). | Over 12 weeks of treatment | No |
| Secondary | Liver Function Testing | Liver function will be tested via biochemistry to determine the frequency of elevated liver enzymes. | After 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment | Yes |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|