A Comparison of Amethocaine Cream vs. Liposomal Lidocaine Cream for Venipuncture in Children.

Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Comparison of Amethocaine Creams Versus Liposomal Lidocaine Cream as Pain Reliever Prior to Venipuncture in Children at the Paediatric Emergency Department.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00353002
• Other study ID #: R-06-266
• Secondary ID: LHRI IRF
• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: N/A
• First received: July 14, 2006
• Last updated: August 25, 2017
• Start date: July 2006
• Est. completion date: December 2006

Study information

• Verified date: August 2017
• Source: Lawson Health Research Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

All patients undergoing venepuncture or venous cannulation in pediatric emergency department will be treated with either Amethocaine, or Liposomal Lidocaine (4%) cream at the site of cannulation in order to determine the efficacy of these creams in controlling pain during procedures and to determine the success rate of these procedures.

Description:

Children commonly require blood taking or placement of an intravenous line for both diagnosis and treatment during their visit to the emergency department. The distress from needle puncture is a particular issue in children. The development of needle phobia can subsequently adversely affect the well-being of the children and their relationship with the medical staff. Thus reduction of pain and distress would be beneficial to patients, parents, and medical personnel.

Amethocaine (tetracaine 4%) (Ametop) is another topical anaesthetic cream which was marketed in Canada over the last 10 years; it was developed by Dr. David Wollfson at Queen's University, Belfast, the cream is available in a 1.5g tube that delivers only 1 dose, at a cost of ($3.24). structurally it has an ester type bond (Para-amino benzoic acid) and is formulated as a free base to allow tetracaine to diffuse across the skin barrier and reach pain receptors (nociceptors) which are located below the stratum corneum (outer most layer of skin). It acts by inhibiting sodium ion flux across the axon membrane thus preventing the nociceptors from signalling pain to the central nervous system. The application time required for the cream is only 30 minutes, and it possesses an action time of 4 hours after removal from the skin. Also Amethocaine has a low risk for methemoglobinemia, therefore it can be used safely in neonatal period and the only disadvantage of Amethocaine cream is skin erythema due to vasodilatation effect.

Liposomal lidocaine 4% cream (Maxilene, RGR Pharma, Windsor, Ontario) is another anaesthetic cream that was launched recently in Canada in 2003. And 5 gm tube priced is 15 $. The liposome-encapsulated formulation protects the anesthetic from being metabolized too quickly (12) It has short onset of action and minimal vasoactive properties that minimize any potential interference with cannulation success, and it is not associated with methemoglobinemia.

As of yet, there has not been a study done in children in the Emergency Department setting comparing the efficacy and side effects of both Liposomal Lidocaine cream and Amethocaine cream. Thus, there is no evidence guiding the use of these agents in Paediatric Emergency care setting, Furthermore using these creams are not considered standard care for children in Canada, and the usual clinical practice in Canadian emergency departments is not to use local anesthesia creams before IV insertion or blood extraction.

Thus, if positive the results of this study could be directly applied to changing the care of children in acute and emergency care setting.

Both creams have shown considerable potential in alleviating procedure pain, but both creams can also cause skin effect, and thus may affect the success rate of these procedures. Therefore we would like to test the two creams to demonstrate the efficacy of these two creams in controlling pain. As Liposomal Lidocaine is believed to have fewer side and skin effects than Amethocaine, it's possible that the success rate may be better with Liposomal Lidocaine than with Amethocaine cream and thus would be preferred agent for use for children in the Emergency and acute care setting.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Withdrawn
• Enrollment: 0
• Est. completion date: December 2006
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 5 Years to 12 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• All children age who are visiting the paediatric emergency department and need for IV cannulation or blood workup as part of their management. The need for IV placement or blood drawing will be based on the clinical evaluation of the child by experienced triage nursing personnel.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Lack of parental agreement

• Broken skin

• Known sensitivity to Amethocaine or Liposomal Lidocaine cream.

• Children with critical illness requiring immediate cannulation (e.g., sepsis, severe dehydration, Trauma)

• Children who are already receiving opioid analgesia or topical anesthesia.

• Children who have already participated in the study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain

Intervention

Drug:
• Ametop (4% Amethocaine cream )

• Maxilene (4% Liposomal Lidocaine)

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Children's Hospital of Western Ontario	London	Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Lawson Health Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (10)

Arrowsmith J, Campbell C. A comparison of local anaesthetics for venepuncture. Arch Dis Child. 2000 Apr;82(4):309-10. — View Citation

Bishai R, Taddio A, Bar-Oz B, Freedman MH, Koren G. Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children. Pediatrics. 1999 Sep;104(3):e31. — View Citation

Browne J, Awad I, Plant R, McAdoo J, Shorten G. Topical amethocaine (Ametop) is superior to EMLA for intravenous cannulation. Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics. Can J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;46(11):1014-8. — View Citation

Bucalo BD, Mirikitani EJ, Moy RL. Comparison of skin anesthetic effect of liposomal lidocaine, nonliposomal lidocaine, and EMLA using 30-minute application time. Dermatol Surg. 1998 May;24(5):537-41. — View Citation

Cereda CM, de Araujo DR, Brunetto GB, De Paula E. Liposomal prilocaine: preparation, characterization, and in vivo evaluation. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2004 Jul 15;7(2):235-40. — View Citation

Choy L, Collier J, Watson AR. Comparison of lignocaine-prilocaine cream and amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venepuncture in children. Acta Paediatr. 1999 Sep;88(9):961-4. — View Citation

Eichenfield LF, Funk A, Fallon-Friedlander S, Cunningham BB. A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of ELA-Max (4% liposomal lidocaine) as compared with eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream for pain reduction of venipuncture in children. Pediatrics. 2002 Jun;109(6):1093-9. — View Citation

Lawson RA, Smart NG, Gudgeon AC, Morton NS. Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;75(3):282-5. — View Citation

Taddio A, Soin HK, Schuh S, Koren G, Scolnik D. Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2005 Jun 21;172(13):1691-5. — View Citation

Zempsky WT, Cravero JP; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1348-56. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Facial pain scale score of child during procedure		Immediate
Secondary	Compare local and systemic side effects of both creams		Within hour of procedure