Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trial
— PHEDOPOOfficial title:
Identification of Predictive Factors of Postoperative Pain After Oral Surgery From Phenotypic Parameters Easily Accessible Preoperatively
This project aims to study various predictive factors of postoperative pain after oral surgery among different parameters accessible preoperatively, in order to build a predictive model. It also aims to validate the external consistency of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in an odontological context.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 73 |
Est. completion date | August 1, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | August 1, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patient, male or female, eligible for dental extraction under local anesthesia, - either a tooth on the arch, - either wisdom tooth(s) (2 homolateral wisdom teeth (maxilla + mandibular) or a mandibular wisdom tooth). - Fluent in speaking and reading French. - Able to give informed consent to research. - Affiliation to a Social Security scheme. Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant or breastfeeding women. - Contraindication to paracetamol, NSAIDs, tramadol, or anesthetic agents local. - Patient uncooperative, unlikely or unable to comply with all procedures of the protocol. - Chronic use of opiates, in a therapeutic or illicit context. - Chronic depression on long-term antidepressants. - Stomatological pathology that may interfere with the conduct of the intervention or modify the results: insufficient mouth opening, pathologies of the temporal mandibular joints ... - Active medical pathology, or any medical condition judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study. - Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice. - Refusal to participate. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHU de Clermont-Ferrand | Clermont-Ferrand |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 1 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the morning of day 1 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 1 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the evening of day 1 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 2 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the morning of day 2 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 2 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the evening of day 2 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 3 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the morning of day 3 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 3 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the evening of day 3 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 4 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the morning of day 4 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 4 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the evening of day 4 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 5 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the morning of day 5 | |
Primary | Postoperative pain Day 5 | The pain will be measured from the collection of an intensity measured on a simple 11-point numerical scale (ENS) ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = the worst pain imaginable" | Information gathering on the evening of day 5 | |
Secondary | Explanatory variable 1: Pain Sensitive Questionnaire | The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) is a self-administered questionnaire comprising 17 items, each rated from 0 to 10. items n° 3-6-7-10-11-12-14 evoke moderately painful situations (and their sum makes it possible to calculate a "minor" PSQ score), and items n° 1-2-4-8- 15-16-17 evoke clearly painful situations (and their sum makes it possible to calculate a "moderate" PSQ score). The sum of these two scores is the "total" PSQ score. As each response to each item ranges from 0 to 10, the minimum value for all scores is 0, and the maximal ones for the minor, the moderate and the total PSQ scores are respectively 7, 7 and 14. The higher the scores, the higher the sensitivity to pain. | 1 time only before surgery | |
Secondary | Explanatory variable 2: Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) | Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale is based on 4 main questions and calculates a score from 5 to 20 (0-8: no anxiety; 9-12: moderate anxiety; 13-14: high anxiety; 15-20: severe anxiety) | 1 time only before surgery | |
Secondary | Explanatory variable 3: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale is based on 13 questions that cover 3 representative domains of dramatization: exaggeration of the pain felt (magnification), the tendency to constantly meditate on the pain (rumination) and the feeling of abandonment or lack of associated support (helplessness). As each response to each of the 13 responses items ranges from 0 to 4, the minimum value for the PCS score is 0, and the maximal is 52. The higher the score, the higher the level of pain catastrophizing. | 1 time only before surgery | |
Secondary | Explanatory variable 4: Gender | Gender will be determined between male or female subject | 1 time only before surgery | |
Secondary | Explanatory variable 5: Eye color | The color of the iris will be determined by the scale of Martine and Schultz:
Light tones: 1-2: Blue 3: Blue gray 4: Gray 5: Blue-gray with yellow/brown spots 6: Grey-green with yellow/brown spots 7: Green 8: Green with yellow/brown spots 9-10-11: Light brown or hazelnut brown Dark tones: 12-13: Brown 14-15: Dark brown to black |
1 time only before surgery | |
Secondary | Explanatory variable 6: Hair color | Hair color will be determined by color:
Black Brown Blond Red |
1 time only before surgery | |
Secondary | Explanatory variable 7: Blood group | The blood group will be determined by the groups:
O HAS B AB as well as Rhesus + or - |
1 time only before surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05480111 -
The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06129305 -
Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
|
||
Completed |
NCT04401826 -
Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04020133 -
the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03023462 -
Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03652103 -
Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03546738 -
Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03528343 -
Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03261193 -
ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02525133 -
Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03244540 -
Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section
|
Phase 4 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05316168 -
Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04130464 -
Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management
|
Phase 4 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04574791 -
Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04073069 -
Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04526236 -
Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05351229 -
Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05543109 -
Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05346588 -
THRIVE Feasibility Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04919317 -
Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty
|
Phase 2 |