Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trial
Official title:
Single Dose Oral Celecoxib (With or Without Acetaminophen) for Acute Post-operative Pain Following Impacted Third Molar Surgery.
| Verified date | February 2024 |
| Source | The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect on postoperative pain of a single agent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) [celecoxib plus placebo] to an NSAID combination [celecoxib plus acetaminophen] administered preemptively to patients prior to impacted third molar surgery. .
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 65 |
| Est. completion date | March 1, 2023 |
| Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2023 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1 or 2 - at least 1 impacted mandibular third molar planned for extraction Exclusion Criteria: - ASA 3 or higher for physical status classification - severe pericoronitis associated with third molar to be extracted - any known allergies to NSAIDs, aspirin, acetaminophen, sulfa drugs - history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease - hepatic disease or impairment - pregnancy |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston | Texas |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston |
United States,
Bauer HC, Duarte FL, Horliana AC, Tortamano IP, Perez FE, Simone JL, Jorge WA. Assessment of preemptive analgesia with ibuprofen coadministered or not with dexamethasone in third molar surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;17(3):165-71. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0360-7. Epub 2012 Sep 5. — View Citation
Cicconetti A, Bartoli A, Ripari F, Ripari A. COX-2 selective inhibitors: a literature review of analgesic efficacy and safety in oral-maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Feb;97(2):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.08.032. — View Citation
Gong L, Thorn CF, Bertagnolli MM, Grosser T, Altman RB, Klein TE. Celecoxib pathways: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012 Apr;22(4):310-8. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32834f94cb. No abstract available. — View Citation
Hawkey CJ. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;15(5):801-20. doi: 10.1053/bega.2001.0236. — View Citation
Jung YS, Kim MK, Um YJ, Park HS, Lee EW, Kang JW. The effects on postoperative oral surgery pain by varying NSAID administration times: comparison on effect of preemptive analgesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Nov;100(5):559-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.065. — View Citation
May N, Epstein J, Osborne B. Selective COX-2 inhibitors: a review of their therapeutic potential and safety in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Oct;92(4):399-405. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.115127. — View Citation
Nissen SE, Yeomans ND, Solomon DH, Luscher TF, Libby P, Husni ME, Graham DY, Borer JS, Wisniewski LM, Wolski KE, Wang Q, Menon V, Ruschitzka F, Gaffney M, Beckerman B, Berger MF, Bao W, Lincoff AM; PRECISION Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2519-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593. Epub 2016 Nov 13. — View Citation
Ong CK, Lirk P, Seymour RA, Jenkins BJ. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):757-773. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144428.98767.0E. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 3 hours after procedure | |
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 8 hours after procedure | |
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 12 hours after procedure | |
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 18 hours after procedure | |
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 24 hours after procedure | |
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 36 hours after procedure | |
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 48 hours after procedure | |
| Primary | Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. | 72 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 3 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 8 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 12 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 18 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 24 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 36 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 48 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire | A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. | 72 hours after procedure | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Receive an Emergency Analgesic Intervention | Emergency interventions are medications or treatments for postoperative pain not prescribed in study, including medications taken other than those prescribed for after the surgery, calling for prescription of medications other than those prescribed for after the surgery, and seeking outside dental/medical attention (for example: private practice or hospital). | Any time during the 72 hours after procedure |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT05480111 -
The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT06129305 -
Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04401826 -
Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04020133 -
the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03023462 -
Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03546738 -
Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03652103 -
Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
|
Phase 4 | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT03528343 -
Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT03261193 -
ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT02525133 -
Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT03244540 -
Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section
|
Phase 4 | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05316168 -
Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction
|
Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04130464 -
Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management
|
Phase 4 | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04574791 -
Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04526236 -
Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT04073069 -
Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05351229 -
Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05543109 -
Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05346588 -
THRIVE Feasibility Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04919317 -
Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty
|
Phase 2 |