Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04790812
Other study ID # HSC-DB-20-0118
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date April 22, 2021
Est. completion date March 1, 2023

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect on postoperative pain of a single agent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) [celecoxib plus placebo] to an NSAID combination [celecoxib plus acetaminophen] administered preemptively to patients prior to impacted third molar surgery. .


Description:

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective clinical trial is designed to compare the postoperative pain reduction of a single agent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and NSAID combination regimen administered preemptively. Subjects will be given a single oral dose of a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor (celecoxib 200mg), or celecoxib 200 mg in combination with acetaminophen (APAP 1000 mg) 30 to 60 minutes prior to the procedure. Oral surgery involving at least one impacted mandibular third molar will be performed using a combination of intravenous sedation and local anesthesia following UTHealth School of Dentistry (UTSD) surgical protocol. All subjects will be released with identical postoperative instructions and prescriptions for pain management. Nonopioid pain management will be prescribed as follows: 600mg ibuprofen with 500 mg APAP every 6 hours for the first 3 days, then as needed for pain. Subjects will be asked to document medication consumption, postoperative pain and complications for the following 3 days using a Qualtrics survey. An oral and maxillofacial surgery resident or faculty on call can offer emergency intervention with prescription of an opioid analgesic.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 65
Est. completion date March 1, 2023
Est. primary completion date March 1, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 45 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1 or 2 - at least 1 impacted mandibular third molar planned for extraction Exclusion Criteria: - ASA 3 or higher for physical status classification - severe pericoronitis associated with third molar to be extracted - any known allergies to NSAIDs, aspirin, acetaminophen, sulfa drugs - history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease - hepatic disease or impairment - pregnancy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Celecoxib
Single, preemptive oral dose 200mg of celecoxib. A cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor for pain management. A COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).
Acetaminophen
Single, preemptive oral dose 1000mg of acetaminophen. An over-the-counter medication for pain management.
Placebo
A capsule with no active ingredients designed to mimic the appearance of the acetaminophen capsule to ensure blinding of patients and care providers.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (8)

Bauer HC, Duarte FL, Horliana AC, Tortamano IP, Perez FE, Simone JL, Jorge WA. Assessment of preemptive analgesia with ibuprofen coadministered or not with dexamethasone in third molar surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;17(3):165-71. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0360-7. Epub 2012 Sep 5. — View Citation

Cicconetti A, Bartoli A, Ripari F, Ripari A. COX-2 selective inhibitors: a literature review of analgesic efficacy and safety in oral-maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Feb;97(2):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.08.032. — View Citation

Gong L, Thorn CF, Bertagnolli MM, Grosser T, Altman RB, Klein TE. Celecoxib pathways: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012 Apr;22(4):310-8. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32834f94cb. No abstract available. — View Citation

Hawkey CJ. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;15(5):801-20. doi: 10.1053/bega.2001.0236. — View Citation

Jung YS, Kim MK, Um YJ, Park HS, Lee EW, Kang JW. The effects on postoperative oral surgery pain by varying NSAID administration times: comparison on effect of preemptive analgesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Nov;100(5):559-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.065. — View Citation

May N, Epstein J, Osborne B. Selective COX-2 inhibitors: a review of their therapeutic potential and safety in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Oct;92(4):399-405. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.115127. — View Citation

Nissen SE, Yeomans ND, Solomon DH, Luscher TF, Libby P, Husni ME, Graham DY, Borer JS, Wisniewski LM, Wolski KE, Wang Q, Menon V, Ruschitzka F, Gaffney M, Beckerman B, Berger MF, Bao W, Lincoff AM; PRECISION Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2519-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593. Epub 2016 Nov 13. — View Citation

Ong CK, Lirk P, Seymour RA, Jenkins BJ. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):757-773. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144428.98767.0E. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 3 hours after procedure
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 8 hours after procedure
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 12 hours after procedure
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 18 hours after procedure
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 24 hours after procedure
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 36 hours after procedure
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 48 hours after procedure
Primary Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain. 72 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 3 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 8 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 12 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 18 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 24 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 36 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 48 hours after procedure
Secondary Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire A questionnaire will ask whether the study participant's pain is dull, aching, throbbing, pulsing, stinging, stabbing, none and/or other. Results will be reported categorically as the number of participants who experience the pain descriptor. 72 hours after procedure
Secondary Number of Participants Who Receive an Emergency Analgesic Intervention Emergency interventions are medications or treatments for postoperative pain not prescribed in study, including medications taken other than those prescribed for after the surgery, calling for prescription of medications other than those prescribed for after the surgery, and seeking outside dental/medical attention (for example: private practice or hospital). Any time during the 72 hours after procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05480111 - The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT06129305 - Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
Completed NCT04401826 - Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile N/A
Recruiting NCT04020133 - the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. N/A
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03546738 - Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03652103 - Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT03528343 - Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT03261193 - ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain Phase 3
Completed NCT02525133 - Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty Phase 3
Completed NCT03244540 - Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05316168 - Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04130464 - Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT04574791 - Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT04526236 - Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing Phase 4
Completed NCT04073069 - Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05351229 - Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05543109 - Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block N/A
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT04919317 - Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty Phase 2