Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04811209 |
Other study ID # |
20-6059 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 2021 |
Est. completion date |
April 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2021 |
Source |
University Health Network, Toronto |
Contact |
Rongyu Jin |
Phone |
4166035800 |
Email |
rongyu.jin[@]uhn.ca |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study seeks to define what constitutes an MCID and a PASS in patients undergoing a
variety of elective major orthopedic surgery.
Description:
Acute postoperative pain after orthopaedic surgery is common and approximately 40% of all
surgical patients experience moderate-severe acute postoperative pain. Treatment of acute
pain after surgery is important to relieve patient suffering, expedite resumption of
activities of daily living, mitigate the risk of postoperative complications, speed
ambulation and rehabilitation and hospital discharge. Good pain treatment requires proper and
sound pain assessment to guide analgesic therapy. Past studies have determined the MCID
values for a variety of chronic pain disorders. There are however limited data on the MCID
for acute pain.At the present time, most perioperative acute pain studies use MCID values
that are extrapolated from chronic pain studies yet the validity of MCID extrapolation
remains unknown. Procedure-specific MCID for pain after most major orthopedic surgery has not
been reported.The MCID for a patient reported outcome can be determined using an anchor and a
distribution based method.The anchor based method uses a subjective Global Rating Scale (GRS)
scale to assess patient's perception of pain relief after treatment. This is a 15-point
Likert scale that ranges from -7 to +7 .Another method to determine the MCID value in pain is
the distribution based method using mathematical calculations to generate 3 MCID values - 1)
0.3 standard deviation (SD) of mean change in NRS scores, 2) the standard error of
measurement (SEM), and 3) 5% of the instrument range of the mean change in the NRS scores
after an analgesic intervention according to patient-rated GAR scale. The SEM is calculated
as the SD multiplied by the square root of 1 minus the intraclass correlation coefficient.
The final MCID value is the average of 4 values, 1 generated from the anchored and 3
generated from the distribution based methods.
The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is another measure for patient-reported outcomes.
It represents the threshold beyond which patients consider themselves well (satisfied) after
an intervention. The PASS is an absolute value, not a change but this value will vary among
patients. In essence, PASS indicates a state of wellbeing (feeling good) as opposed to MCID,
a state of improvement (feeling better). The 2 concepts are complementary but contrary to
MCID, the PASS is the outcome of interest, instead of the extent of improvement. To determine
PASS, the patients are asked this question "In your opinion, do you consider your current
pain state satisfactory after your operation?" Patients responding "yes" are considered
having an acceptable pain state. The PASS is the 75th centile of the pain scale in those who
rated their pain state as satisfactory. Higher baseline pain scores are often associated with
higher PASS estimates. Little is known about PASS for acute pain after surgery thus a need to
determine this benchmark to properly evaluate the clinical benefits of analgesic
interventions.
Quality of Recovery (QoR) is another important PRO measure when evaluating the impact of
novel intervention strategies. Quality of recovery can be assessed using the QoR-15
questionnaire (scores 0-150) which measures physical & mental well-being as an indication of
the quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia.
To determine MCID for QoR, both the anchor and distribution based methods will be used. The
patient will be asked "How would you rate your overall recovery from surgery since
yesterday?" Patients will use the same GRS (-7 to +7) to measure their response. With the
anchored-based method, the MCID is the mean change in the QoR-15 score when the patient
reports a GRS score of +2 or +3. The distribution-based method will generate 3 other MCID
values: 1) 0.3 standard deviation (SD) of the mean change in the QoR score; 2) the standard
error of measurement (SEM); and 3) 5% of the instrument range. Again, the final MCID value is
the average of 4 values, 1 generated from the anchored and 3 generated from the distribution
based methods.
To determine PASS for QoR, the patients will be asked, "In your opinion, have you made a good
recovery from your operation?" with response options of yes, no, or unsure. Those who give a
positive response is considered having made a good recovery. The PASS for QoR is the 75th
centile of the QoR-15 score in those who rated their recovery as good. The only MCID and PASS
study by Myles reported a QoR-15 score of 8 & 118 (out of 150), respectively, in patients
undergoing a broad range of surgical procedures. Procedure-specific MCID & PASS for QoR-15
after major orthopaedic surgery are currently unknown. Our proposed observational study seeks
to define what constitutes an MCID and a PASS in patients undergoing a variety of elective
major orthopedic surgery.