Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04458467 |
Other study ID # |
Auto Intermittent Boluses |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 15, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
March 16, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2022 |
Source |
University of California, San Diego |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This will be a randomized comparison of continuous local anesthetic infusion with patient
controlled boluses (PCA) to automated boluses with PCA for continuous popliteal sciatic nerve
blocks. The goal will be to determine the relationship between method of local anesthetic
administration (continuous with PCA initiated at discharge vs. intermittent dosing with PCA
with a 5-hour delay) for continuous peripheral nerve block and the resulting pain control and
duration of analgesia.
Description:
Specific Aim: To determine the relationship between method of local anesthetic administration
(continuous with PCA vs. intermittent dosing with PCA) for continuous peripheral nerve block
and the resulting pain control.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that, compared with a traditional fixed, continuous
basal infusion initiated prior to discharge, perineural local anesthetic administered with
variable automated boluses at a lower dose and a 5-hour delay following discharge will (1)
provide at least noninferior analgesia during the period that both techniques are
functioning; and, (2) will result in a longer overall duration of administration [dual
primary end points].
Enrollment: Patients 18 years and older undergoing painful foot and/or ankle surgery will be
offered enrollment.
Block placement: The nerve block site will be cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate and
isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep One-Step, Medi-Flex Hospital Products, Inc., Overland Park, KS,
USA), and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. The ultrasound probe will be readied
for use and placed to visualize the short-axis (cross-section) of the target nerve. A skin
wheal will be raised at the catheter-placement needle's anticipated point of entry. An 8.9
cm, 17-gauge, insulated needle (FlexTip, Arrow International, Reading, PA, USA) will be used
to place all perineural catheters. The catheter-placement 17G needle will be inserted through
the skin wheal, advanced in-plane beneath the US transducer and directed toward the target
nerve. Normal saline (1-2 mL) will be administered via the needle to open the space around
the nerve.
A flexible non-stimulating perineural catheter (FlexTip, Arrow International, Reading, PA,
USA) will be inserted 2-3 cm past the needle tip. After catheter insertion, Ropivacaine 0.5%
(20 mL) will be administered via the catheter under ultrasound visualization. Sensation in
the tibial and peroneal nerve distributions will be checked for anesthetic effect up to 15
minutes following initial local anesthetic bolus. A "successful" regional block will be
defined as sensory- and motor-block onset in all expected nerve distributions within the 15
minutes following the local anesthetic injection.
The initial local anesthetic bolus may provide complete surgical anesthesia for the
procedure. Patients who desire a general anesthetic or experience a partial block that is not
adequate for surgical anesthesia will receive a general anesthetic. Additional boluses of
Ropivacaine 0.5% and epinephrine may be given, if needed, via the perineural catheter.
Randomization: Subjects will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: (1) automated
regular boluses (ARB) with a 5-hour delay or (2) continuous infusion initiated at discharge
in a 1:1 ratio using computer generated lists sealed in opaque envelopes not opened until
after the nerve has been identified and deemed appropriate for catheter placement.
Postoperative Procedures: Following completion of the procedure in the operating room, an
infusion pump (Infutronix, Natick, Massachusetts) with a 500 mL ropivacaine 0.2% reservoir
will be attached to the patient's perineural catheter. For patients in the continuous
infusion group, the pump will provide a 6 mL/h basal infusion and a 4 mL patient-controlled
bolus with a 30-minute lockout (standard at UCSD). For patients in the automated intermittent
bolus group, the pump will provide an automatic 8 mL bolus once every 2 hours and have a 4 mL
patient-controlled bolus with a 30 minute lockout. In addition, for those in the automated
intermittent bolus group, the infusion pump will be set in a "pause" mode that delays
initiation of the automated bolus doses by 5 hours (this can be over-ridden by patients if
they would like to initiate their perineural infusion earlier than 5 hours).
Data Collection: Data will be gathered from the patients' electronic medical record, by
telephone follow-up, and from the infusion pumps memory. Subjects will be contacted via phone
for the six days following surgery to collect information regarding surgical pain (Numeric
Rating Scale of 0 to 10, with "0" being no pain and "10" being the worst pain ever
experienced), analgesic use, number of sleep disturbances due to pain, and satisfaction with
pain control.
Statistics: This study will be powered for two primary end points: (1) the average NRS
queried on postoperative day 1; and (2) the duration of treatment from when the infusion pump
was initially turned on until the local anesthetic reservoir was exhausted. The dual
hypotheses will be tested with a serial testing strategy, such that Hypothesis 2 will not be
formally tested unless the conclusion of Hypothesis 1 is at least "noninferiority".
Noninferiority will be assessed by comparing the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval
for the difference on the NRS (range: 0 to 10) to a pre-specified noninferiority margin of
1.7 NRS units. This will provide evidence that the analgesia provided by the novel automated
boluses is no worse than 1.7 NRS units compared to Continuous Basal infusion.
Baseline characteristics of the randomized groups will be summarized with means, standard
deviations, and quartiles. Balance between groups will be assessed. Specifically,
standardized differences will be calculated using Cohen's d whereby the difference in means
or proportions is divided by the pooled standard deviation estimates. Any key variables (age,
sex, height, weight, and BMI) with an absolute standardized difference >0.47 (with
1.96×√(2/n)=0.47) will be noted and included in a linear regression model to obtain an
estimate of the treatment group differences adjusted for the imbalanced covariate(s). If
residuals from the linear regression indicate violations of key assumptions (i.e.
homoscedasticity or Guassian distribution), data transformations and/or alternative
generalized linear models will be applied as appropriate.
Secondary outcomes will also be analyzed by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, or linear models (or
generalized linear models) as appropriate with covariates for any imbalanced covariates. No
multiplicity adjustments will be applied for these analyses.
Sample size estimate: Power is simulated based on the distribution of pain measured with the
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) observed in previous studies. Specifically, the investigators
simulate NRS scores from a discrete distribution. This results in an expected interquartile
range 1 to 4, and a median of 3 NRS units. 1000 trials were simulated in which the two
groups, n=35 per group, were assumed to follow the same discrete distribution, submitted each
trial to a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, and derived 95% confidence intervals. Out of the 1000
trials, 792 (79.2%) correctly resulted in a conclusion of non-inferiority; suggesting that
the probability that the trial correctly concludes non-inferiority is about 80% when the
groups follow exactly equivalent distributions.
If the test for Hypothesis 1 concludes noninferiority (scenario A, B, or C in Figure 1), the
investigators will test for a difference in overall duration of administration again using
the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Power is approximated by a two-sample t-test calculation. Assuming a standard deviation of
SD=37 hours (corresponding to an interquartile range of 50 to 100 hours), the investigators
expect that a sample size of n=35 provides 80% power to detect a mean group difference of 25
hours with a two-sided alpha of 5%.
Total enrollment: 70 subjects plus 30 for misplaced catheters or subjects otherwise unable to
be randomized; and subjects who withdraw. This allows for a possible total of 100 subjects.