Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06234046 |
Other study ID # |
FMASU R140/2023 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
May 28, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
December 15, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
Ain Shams University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this Randomized controlled trial is to assessment the efficacy of Rifaximin as a
prophylaxis of SBP in comparison with ciprofloxacin in Egyptian patients.
This randomized controlled trial included 80 Egyptian patients diagnosed with cirrhotic liver
disease and ascites just recovered from SBP attack grouped into two groups as; Group (1)
included 40 cases received Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dose for a six-months period and
group (2) included 40 cases received Ciprofloxacin as 750 mg once weekly dose for a
six-months period.
All patients of the two groups were followed up for recurrence of SBP for 6 months. The study
endpoints would be SBP, death, compliance failure, or liver transplantation.
Description:
This randomized controlled trial included 80 Egyptian patients diagnosed with cirrhotic liver
disease and ascites just recovered from SBP attack grouped into two groups as;
- Group (1) included 40 cases received Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dose for a
six-months period.
- Group (2) included 40 cases received Ciprofloxacin as 750 mg once weekly dose for a
six-months period.
The included cases were collected from hepatology outpatient clinic and inpatient department
at Ain shams University hospital between May 2023 and November 2023 after the scientific
ethical committee approval. A written consent was obtained from the included cases.
Cases with metastatic HCC, patients with drug allergy from Ciprofloxacin or Rifaximin, those
having ascites secondary to other causes rather than liver cirrhosis, those having
gastroenterology malignancy, patients on immunotherapy, and HIV patients were all excluded
from the trial. Before starting the trial, the all cases were diagnosed as SBP with ascitic
fluid sample with polymorphonuclear cell count more than 250 cells /µL and received medical
treatment of SBP according to EASL guidelines for treatment of SBP.
All patients of the two groups were followed up for recurrence of SBP for 6 months. The study
endpoints would be SBP, death, compliance failure, or liver transplantation.
All included patients went through a comprehensive medical history, full physical assessment
as well as full laboratory examination including; CBC, liver profile (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT,
total & direct bilirubin, serum albumin, serum total proteins), kidney function tests
(S.creat, BUN), ascitic fluid sample was taken from every patients at the starting of the
trial to make sure the recovery from the previous SBP attack (AFS1) and another sample was
taken once the patient was suspected to have another attack of SBP or after 6 months of
treatment (AFS2). The ascitic samples were subjected to analysis of the differential cell
count and measurement of ascitic albumin, glucose, total proteins and LDH, culture and
sensitivity were assessed. The Child-Pugh's score were assessed, and pelvi-abdominal
ultrasound were done for all patients.