Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) During Accelerating the En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth Using a Low-intensity Direct Electrical Current: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Verified date | June 2023 |
Source | Damascus University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Forty patients with class II division 1 malocclusion who will require extraction of the upper first premolars as a part of the orthodontic treatment plan will be invited to participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: the electrical group and the control group. The en-masse retraction technique will be used to retract the upper anterior teeth using mini-implants as an anchor unit to provide the maximum anchorage and Nickle-Titanium closed coil springs that will be stretched from the mini-implants to the crimpable hooks on the base wire and applied 250 g of force per side. A special removable electrical device will be used to provide electrical stimulation during the retraction phase. The levels of pain and discomfort will be self-reported using a questionnaire with visual analog scales.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | May 15, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | September 15, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 17 Years to 25 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult healthy patients of both sexes 2. Age range: 17-25 years. 3. Class II Division 1 malocclusion: - Mild to moderate skeletal Class II (ANB = 5-7) - Protrusion less than 10 mm (5 to 10 mm of overjet) - Normal or vertical growth pattern (MM = 26; SN-MP = 33; Y Axis = 65) - Dental crowding less than 3 mm 4. The presence of all permanent upper teeth (regardless of third molars). 5. Good oral and periodontal health: - Probing depth < 4 mm - No radiographic evidence of bone loss. - Gingival index = 1 - Plaque index = 1 Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with previous orthodontic treatment. 2. Patients with severe skeletal dysplasia in all three dimensions. 3. Patients suffer from systemic diseases or syndromes 4. Patients on medication for systemic disorders, pregnancy, or steroid therapy. 5. Patients showing any signs of active periodontal disease |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Syrian Arab Republic | Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damsacus | Damascus |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Damascus University |
Syrian Arab Republic,
Davidovitch Z, Finkelson MD, Steigman S, Shanfeld JL, Montgomery PC, Korostoff E. Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement. II. Increase in rate of tooth movement and periodontal cyclic nucleotide levels by combined force and electric current. Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90222-5. — View Citation
Roth PM, Thrash WJ. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for controlling pain associated with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986 Aug;90(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90045-4. — View Citation
Shaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Al-Sabbagh R, Alam MK, Mahmoud G, Idris G. A Novel Method to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Low-Intensity Direct Electrical Current in Patients Requiring en-Masse Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth: A Preliminary Clinical Report. Cureus. 2023 May 24;15(5):e39438. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39438. eCollection 2023 May. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in the perception of pain | Patients will be asked this question about their perception of pain. 'What is the degree of pain accompanying this moment?' Pain is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line to indicate the level of pain being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no pain (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) pain (VAS=100). | Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth | |
Primary | Change in the perception of discomfort | Patients will be asked this question about their perception of discomfort. 'What is the degree of discomfort that accompanies this moment?' Discomfort is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of discomfort being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no discomfort (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) discomfort (VAS=100). | Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth | |
Secondary | Change in the perception of burning | Patients will be asked this question about their perception of burning. 'Do you feel any burning in the upper anterior teeth area?' burning is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of burning being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no burning (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) burning (VAS=100). | Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth | |
Secondary | Change in the perception of swelling | Patients will be asked this question about their perception of swelling. 'Do you feel any Swelling in the upper anterior teeth area?' Swelling is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of Swelling being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no Swelling (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) Swelling (VAS=100). | Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth | |
Secondary | Change in the chewing ability | Patients will be asked this question about their perception of chewing ability. 'what is the degree of chewing difficulties? ' difficulty in chewing is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of difficulty in swallowing being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no difficulty (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to the maximum difficulty in mastication. | Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth | |
Secondary | Change in the speech ability | Patients will be asked this question about their perception of speech ability. ''what is the degree of speech difficulties?' Difficulty in speech is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of difficulty in speech being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no difficulty (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) difficulty (VAS=100). | Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth | |
Secondary | Analgesic consumption | Patients will be asked this question about "Analgesic Consumption". 'Did you need to take pain analgesics?' Analgesic Consumption is assessed by asking the study participant about taking analgesics using a two-point scale (1. Yes, or 2. No). | Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth | |
Secondary | Patients' satisfaction | Patients will be asked this question about satisfaction with orthodontic treatment.
'How satisfied are you with your orthodontic treatment?' Satisfaction is assessed for both groups by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of satisfaction. The left end of the line refers to no satisfaction (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum satisfaction (VAS=100). |
Questionnaires will be filled at the end of the fifth month of the en-masse retraction | |
Secondary | Ease of the procedure | Patients will be asked this question about the ease of the procedure. 'Was it getting used to the accelerating device? ' The procedure's easiness is assessed by asking the participant in the experimental group using a three-point scale (1. easy, 2. Medium, or 3. difficult). | Questionnaires will be filled at the end of the fifth month of the en-masse retraction | |
Secondary | The possibility of repeating the procedure | Patients will be asked this question about "The possibility of repeating the procedure.
'Would you accept to undergo this treatment again?' Patients in the experimental group will be asked about the possibility of repeating the procedure if they can give their decision again. The answer will be collected using a two-point scale (1. Yes, or 2. No). |
Questionnaires will be filled at the end of the fifth month of the en-masse retraction | |
Secondary | Recommendation of the procedure to a friend | Patients will be asked this question about the possibility of recommending the procedure to their friends.
'Would you recommend a friend to undergo this treatment?' Patients in the experimental group will be asked if they would recommend this procedure to a friend. The answer will be collected using a two-point scale (1. Yes, or 2. No). |
Questionnaires will be filled at the end of the fifth month of the en-masse retraction |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04518865 -
Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal Periods
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04972084 -
3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04508322 -
Treatment of Class II Malocclusion With Excessive Overjet
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04028661 -
Evaluation of 3D Printed Modified Twin Block for Correction of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Growing Females
|
N/A |