Percutaneous Intervention Via Femoral Artery Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Suture-mediated Closure System Following Endovascular Peripheral Arterial Procedures
| NCT number | NCT05899478 |
| Other study ID # | SPD01 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | June 2023 |
| Est. completion date | May 2024 |
| Verified date | May 2023 |
| Source | Suzhou Hengruihongyuan Medical Technology Co. LTD |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the suture-mediated closure system produced by Suzhou Hengrui Hongyuan Medical Technology Co., Ltd. following endovascular peripheral arterial procedures.
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Enrollment | 136 |
| Est. completion date | May 2024 |
| Est. primary completion date | March 2024 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Aged 18-80 2. Patients who can use 5Fr to 21Fr sheath for common femoral artery puncture for interventional catheterization or therapy 3. Informed consent signed by the patient or legal representative Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnancy or lactation period; 2. Diameter of femoral artery site for puncture< 5mm; 3. Have participated in another clinical study during the same period; 4. Known allergy to any device component, and/or contraindications of contrast agents and anticoagulants; 5. Vascular injury at the site of the approach; 6. Groin infection; 7. Morbid obesity (BMI=40kg / ?); 8. Ultrasonographic assessment of the entire common femoral artery wall showed that the common femoral artery stenosis was = 50%; 9. There are femoral aneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas or pseudoaneurysms in the common femoral artery; 10. Clamp vessel closures were used at the previous ipsilateral artery approach; 11. Hematoma at ipsilateral artery approach; 12. Other conditions deemed unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial by the investigator. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital ,Zhejiang University School of Medicine | Hangzhou | Zhejiang |
| China | The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine | Hangzhou | Zhejiang |
| China | The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC | Hefei | Anhui |
| China | Zhongshan Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
| China | The Fourth Affiliated Hospital ,Zhejiang University School of Medicine | Yiwu | Zhejiang |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Suzhou Hengruihongyuan Medical Technology Co. LTD |
China,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rate of successful hemostasis | Calculation method: Patients with successful hemostasis / total cases of subjects in the same group x 100%.
Definition of successful hemostasis: Within 10 minutes after completion of the suturing procedure, there is no bleeding or hematoma at the puncture site, and no other intervention or surgical treatment is required. |
10 minutes | |
| Secondary | Operation time | The time for suturing with the vascular closure device. Definition of Operation time: The time it takes for the device to enter the artery, tie the knot, and then be successfully withdrawn from the vessel. | Approximately 15-minutes after device removal | |
| Secondary | Hemostasis time | The time from the catheter sheath is removed to compression is released and no bleeding occurs at the puncture site | Approximately 15-minutes after compression | |
| Secondary | Technical success rate | Calculation method: Patients with technical success/ total cases of subjects in the same group x 100%.
Definition of Technical success: Successful placement of the device,smooth withdrawal, and completion fo the knot. |
Approximately 15-minutes after device removal | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of Compatibility with guidewires of the device | Scale from 1 point (worst) to 5 points (best) | Approximately 15-minutes after device removal | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of Pushing performance of the device | Scale from 1 point (worst) to 5 points (best) | Approximately 15-minutes after device removal | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of Withdrawal performance of the device | Scale from 1 point (worst) to 5 points (best) | Approximately 15-minutes after device removal | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of Performance of tightening knot of the device | Scale from 1 point (worst) to 5 points (best) | Approximately 15-minutes after device removal |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Withdrawn |
NCT00590356 -
Star-Close Versus Angio-Seal for Femoral Artery Hemostasis
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05334095 -
Angio-seal VIP Versus Perclose ProGlide for Closure of the Femoral Artery in Peripheral Vascular Disease
|
N/A |