Sacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparative Effects of Stabilization Exercises and Muscle Energy Techniques on Pain and Disability in Sacroiliac Joint Patients
Verified date | November 2022 |
Source | Riphah International University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Sacroiliac joint is in pelvis. It links the iliac bone (pelvic) bone to the sacrum. This joint pain is due to hyper mobility or instability of the joint, it may also cause by damage to joint between the spine and hip. This pain is typically felt in the lower back, or hip and may radiate to groin area. The aim of this study will be to compare the effects of stabilization exercises and muscle energy techniques on pain and disability in patients with sacroiliac joint pain.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 34 |
Est. completion date | October 5, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | September 30, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 30 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Both men and women age between 30-50 with positive Laslett's criteria. The Cluster of Laslett is a group of four test used for sacroiliac joint pain, the four tests are: 1. Sacroiliac Distraction (Gapping) Test 2. Thigh Thrust Test 3. Sacroiliac Compression (Squish) Test 4. Sacral Thrust test - If a patient has three or more positive pain provocation tests, and then there is a 59% chance that the patient will have Sacroiliac joint pain. Exclusion Criteria: - Trochanteric bursitis - Pelvic bone fracture - Pelvic implants - Pregnancy - Lumbosacral disc herniation - Sacroiliac joint inflammation - Inflammatory bowel disease - Malignancy |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Pakistan | Bakhtawar Amin hospital Multan | Multan | Punjab |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Riphah International University |
Pakistan,
Ahmed UA, Maharaj SS, Van Oosterwijck J. Effects of dynamic stabilization exercises and muscle energy technique on selected biopsychosocial outcomes for patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Scand J Pain. 2021 Feb 24;21(3):495-511. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0133. Print 2021 Jul 27. — View Citation
Barros G, McGrath L, Gelfenbeyn M. Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction in Patients With Low Back Pain. Fed Pract. 2019 Aug;36(8):370-375. — View Citation
Cho HJ, Kwak DS. Movement of the sacroiliac joint: Anatomy, systematic review, and biomechanical considerations. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021 Mar;235(3):357-364. doi: 10.1177/0954411920978021. Epub 2020 Nov 30. — View Citation
Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013 Jan;13(1):99-116. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.148. Review. — View Citation
García-Peñalver UJ, Palop-Montoro MV, Manzano-Sánchez D. Effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique versus Osteopathic Manipulation in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction in Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 22;17(12). pii: E4490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124490. — View Citation
Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD, Lindley EM, Kitchel SH, Patel VV. Sacroiliac Joint Pain and Its Treatment. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;29(2):42-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000359. Review. — View Citation
Sanika V, Prem V, Karvannan H. Comparison of Glutues Maximus Activation to Flexion Bias Exercises Along with MET Technique in Subjects with Anterior Rotated Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction-a Randomised Controlled Trial. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2021 Mar 1;14(1):30-38. eCollection 2021 Mar. — View Citation
Sarkar M, Goyal M, Samuel AJ. Comparing the Effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique and Kinesiotaping in Mechanical Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Non-blinded, Two-Group, Pretest-Posttest Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol. Asian Spine J. 2021 Feb;15(1):54-63. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0300. Epub 2020 Jan 30. — View Citation
Sasaki T, Kurosawa D, Murakami E, Watanabe T. Physical therapeutic options for residual sacrotuberous ligament pain after treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Phys Ther Sci. 2021 Sep;33(9):646-652. doi: 10.1589/jpts.33.646. Epub 2021 Sep 1. — View Citation
Vaseghnia A, Shadmehr A, Attarbashi Moghadam B, Olyaei G, Hadian Rasanani DM-R, Khazaeipour Z. Effects of Muscle Energy Technique on Daily Activities and Lumbar Stiffness in Women With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2019;13:23-30.
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults, including those with chronic pain.
The NPRS is a segmented numeric version in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). The NPRS takes <1 minute to complete The NPRS is a valid and reliable scale to measure pain intensity; High test-retest reliability has been (r = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively) For construct validity, the NPRS was shown to be highly correlated: correlations range from 0.86 to 0.95. |
follow up at 4th week | |
Primary | Modified Oswestry disability index | This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your back or leg pain is affecting your ability to manage in everyday life. Please answer by checking ONE box in each section for the statement which best applies to you. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound.
Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5. |
follow up at 4th week |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05181579 -
Efficacy of Manual Therapy and Sacroiliac Joint Injection in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03230279 -
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Comparison Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01311479 -
Osteopathic Manipulation for Female Interstitial Cystitis Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05432453 -
The Relationship Between Functional Constipation and Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03507049 -
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Versus Sham Operation for Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05404451 -
Comparison of Mulligan Mobilization Technique and Mckenzie Exercises Among Patient With Sacroilliac Joint Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04534829 -
Fluoroscopic vs Ultrasound Guided Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Radiofrequency Ablation
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04519840 -
Diastasis Recti Abdominis Association With Sacroiliac Joint and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Postpartum C-section Women
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04829513 -
Exercise and Two Different Kinesiotape Applications in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
||
Completed |
NCT04717401 -
Comparison Between Strain-counterstrain and Muscle Energy Technique in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04218838 -
Comparison of CornerLoc SI Joint Stabilization and Steroid Injections for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05347537 -
Effects of Mulligan's Mobilization With and Without Clamshell Exercises in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04381208 -
Medical Record, Physical and Neurological Data That Orient to the Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05944861 -
Combination of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasonography Guidance in Sacroiliac Joint Injections
|
N/A |