Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05128552
Other study ID # LVR in ICU
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 15, 2020
Est. completion date October 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date November 2021
Source Cairo University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the LVR technique on cough ineffectiveness, to determine its benefit as a simple, safe, and inexpensive cough augmentation technique, and to determine how much the LVR method, for augmenting CPF, is useful in enhancing the success of extubation and reducing the rate of reintubation.


Description:

An effective cough is so vital in protecting against respiratory tract infections, so the importance of an intact cough mechanism is reflected in the occurrence of pulmonary problems which are the most common cause of hospital admission in people with respiratory muscle weakness who are unable to cough effectively. Ineffective cough results in a tendency to retain bronchial secretions and an increased risk of pulmonary complications, such as frequent or recurrent pneumonia, atelectasis, and infectious respiratory problems. Cough flow testing (expiratory flows testing) is useful as a monitoring or diagnostic tool in clinical practice and research. Both peak expiratory flows (PEF) and cough peak flows (CPF) have been described as useful clinical measures of respiratory muscle function and cough effectiveness. Cough peak flow (CPF) gives an important measure of the cough strength which determines the effectiveness of cough. It is the maximum expiratory flow recorded immediately following the opening of the glottis during normal cough. Cough effectiveness is suboptimal when cough peak flow (CPF) is less than 270 L/min. Mechanical Ventilation "MV" has deleterious effects caused by the endotracheal intubation, including changes in mucociliary clearance and inhibition of the coughing mechanism which, in turn, favor areas of hypoventilation and atelectasis, thus increasing the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respiratory compromise due to recurrent atelectasis, inability to clear secretions, and respiratory infections also increase morbidity and mortality. Prolonged MV results in respiratory muscle dysfunction shown in diaphragmatic atrophy and contractile dysfunction (ic., Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction "VIDD") affecting the ability of the person to cough effectively. Indeed, the onset of VIDD in both animals and humans is rapid as significant diaphragmatic atrophy and contractile dysfunction occur within the first 24 - 48 h of MV. Although suctioning of secretions from the trachea to remove tracheobronchial and upper airway secretions is the standard of care, this method is ineffective for clearing peripheral airways and basal retained secretions. The clinical practice guides referred to patients with respiratory muscles weakness like after prolonged MV and in neuromuscular diseases recommend the usage of cough augmentation and mucociliary clearance techniques in patients with CPF < 4.5 L/s (270 L'min) and using such techniques continuously in patients with CPF < 2.7 L/s (160 L/min). Cough augmentation techniques such as LVR are supposed to be used to reinforce cough effectiveness, particularly for patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. So, the importance and strength of this study are to assess the effects of the LVR technique as a cough augmentation mean on CPF of post-extubated patients with an ineffective cough which can cause risky respiratory complications may lead to death in confronting to effects of traditional chest physiotherapy and suctioning and therefore, their therapy or management program can be precisely and appropriately planned. Moreover, the identification of effective, safe measures to optimize cough efficacy is, therefore, key to improving quality of life and minimizing morbidity & mortality rates in those patients. Additionally, as a secondary purpose to determine how much the LVR method, for augmenting CPF. is useful in enhancing the success of extubation and reducing the rate of re-intubation that indicated if extubation failure occurred.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date October 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date September 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 40 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Forty to sixty years old patients had undergone mechanical ventilation for = 48 hours in a controlled mode and had been weaned after a successful spontaneous breathing trial with suboptimal or poor CPF < 270 L/min. - Patients were able to assume a sitting position. - All participants were aware, cooperative, competent, able to comply with treatment, and able to understand and follow instructions. Exclusion Criteria: - Presence of significant or active hemoptysis, untreated or recent pneumothorax, bullous emphysema, lung trauma, or recent lobectomy. - Patients with comorbidities interfering and compromising the success of either weaning or extubation, like cardiac arrhythmia, pericardial effusion, congestive heart failure, or acute coronary syndrome. - Patients who had originally inadequate training performance of the respiratory muscle such as those having NMD, i.e., myopathy or neuropathy. - Impaired consciousness/inability to communicate. - Patients who had a neurological deficit resulted in bulbar affection. - Patients with indications for MV, but contraindicated for physical therapy like pulmonary embolism. - Patients who had undergone tracheotomy before extubation also were excluded or who had experienced less than 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. - Patients with unstable hemodynamics or cardiac instability. - Current undrained pleural effusion or previous pneumothorax or barotrauma. - Uncontrolled severe COPD, poorly controlled asthma, and severe bronchospasm. - Patients with visual or/and auditory problems.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Lung volume recruitment technique
A self inflating Ambu bag with one way valve , augmentation volume of air within 3 to 4 successive breaths and holding few seconds then coughing
Other:
Traditional chest physiotherapy
Positioning of the patient according the drainage position for each lobe of each lung and applying airway hygiene techniques such as percussion and vibration

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Faculty of physical therapy Cairo University Cairo Giza

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (2)

Rose L, Adhikari NK, Leasa D, Fergusson DA, McKim D. Cough augmentation techniques for extubation or weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 11;1:CD011833. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011833.pub2. Review. — View Citation

Rose L, Adhikari NK, Poon J, Leasa D, McKim DA; CANuVENT Group. Cough Augmentation Techniques in the Critically Ill: A Canadian National Survey. Respir Care. 2016 Oct;61(10):1360-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04775. Epub 2016 Sep 13. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Cough peak flow rate The maximum expiratory flow produced immediately after the glottis opens during a physiological cough "Day 4"
Primary Peak expiratory flow rate The maximum rate at which the air can be expired after a deep inspiration "Day 4"
Primary Oxygen Saturation The percentage that represents how haemoglobin are saturated with oxygen atoms "Day 4"
Secondary Extubation's success The patient pass first 48 - 72 hours after extubation alive and doesn't need to be reintubated "Day 4"
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05030337 - Optimising Ventilation in Preterms With Closed-loop Oxygen Control N/A
Completed NCT05144607 - Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Pressure Curves on the Ability of Professionals to Identify Patient-ventilator Asynchronies N/A
Recruiting NCT03697785 - Weaning Algorithm for Mechanical VEntilation N/A
Completed NCT05084976 - Parental Perception of COVID-19 Vaccine in Technology Dependent Patients
Active, not recruiting NCT05886387 - a Bayesian Analysis of Three Randomised Clinical Trials of Intraoperative Ventilation
Completed NCT04429399 - Lowering PEEP: Weaning From High PEEP Setting N/A
Completed NCT02249039 - Intravenous Clonidine for Sedation in Infants and Children Who Are Mechanically Ventilated - Dosing Finding Study Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02071524 - Evaluation of the Effects of Fluid Therapy on Respiratory Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT01114022 - Prevention Inhalation of Bacterial by Using Endotracheal Tube Balloon Polyvinyl Chloride or Polyurethane N/A
Completed NCT00893763 - Strategies To Prevent Pneumonia 2 (SToPP2) Phase 2
Terminated NCT05056103 - Automated Secretion Removal in ICU Patients N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04558476 - Efficacy of CONvalescent Plasma in Patients With COVID-19 Treated With Mechanical Ventilation Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05295186 - PAV Trial During SBT Trial
Active, not recruiting NCT05370248 - The Effect of 6 ml/kg vs 10 ml/kg Tidal Volume on Diaphragm Dysfunction in Critically Mechanically Ventilated Patient N/A
Completed NCT04589910 - Measuring Thickness of the Normal Diaphragm in Children Via Ultrasound. N/A
Completed NCT04818164 - Prone Position Improves End-Expiratory Lung Volumes in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Completed NCT04193254 - LPP , MP and DP:Relation With Mortality and SOFA in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in ER, Ward and ICU
Completed NCT06332768 - NIV Versus HFO Versus Standard Therapy Immediately After Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS Patients N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03259854 - Non Invasive Mechanical Ventilation VERSUS Oxygen MASK N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03245684 - Assisted or Controlled Ventilation in Ards (Ascovent) N/A