Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04968028
Other study ID # 2021SL029
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 17, 2021
Est. completion date December 31, 2026

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Contact Dan Han, Master
Phone +86 18317028536
Email changzhengspine@163.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and imaging outcomes between Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) and Laminoplasty in the treatment of severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.


Description:

This is a national, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of ACAF and posterior laminoplasty in the treatment of severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. In this study, 164 adult patients aged 18-70 with severe copll were randomly assigned to the experimental group (using ACAF) and the control group (using lamp) according to the ratio of 1:1. The patients were followed up for 2 years.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 164
Est. completion date December 31, 2026
Est. primary completion date July 31, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. The patient's age is 18-70 years old, regardless of gender; 2. The patient was diagnosed as severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (X-ray or CT showed ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament); The imaging findings showed occupied ratio = 60% or involved three or more segments; 3. Symptoms of spinal cord and nerve root compression, or accompanied by spinal cord compression symptoms such as dysfunction of urination and defecation, conservative treatment was ineffective or aggravated gradually; 4. The participant (or his legal guardian) can sign the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Congenital malformations (including but not limited to occipitocervical malformations, congenital cervical fusion, cervical related neurovascular malformations), ossification of cervical ligamentum flavum, cervical trauma, cervical cancer, cervical tuberculosis and other inflammatory diseases; 2. Patients with other spinal diseases such as thoracolumbar vertebrae that affect clinical symptoms; Patients with motor neuron diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other nervous system diseases; 3. The symptoms were aggravated due to recent trauma; 4. Patients who participated in other clinical trials in recent 3 months; 5. The participant (or his legal guardian) with mental illness and cognitive impairment can not give full informed consent; 6. Those who are in poor health and can not tolerate surgery; The patients were not suitable for surgical treatment after preoperative examination.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
ACAF
(1)A standard right-side Smith-Robinson approach is performed. (2) The involved disc tissues are removed. The posterior longitudinal ligament is cut down at the levels cephalic and caudal to OPLL. (3) The anterior portion of the middle vertebral bodies is removed according to the thickness of ossification. Suitable cages are placed into each intervertebral space. (4) On the left side of the vertebra, a 2-mm-wide groove is created at the medial border of the transverse foramina. After that, an curved plated is fixed with screws. (5) On the right side of the vertebrae, a similar groove was also created. (6) Finally, tightening the screws to achieve a gradual evaluation of the vertebrae with OPLL.
Laminoplasty
(1) In the prone position, the skin and nuchal ligament were cut through the posterior median incision, and the paravertebral muscles were stripped layer by layer to expose the bilateral vertebral lamina, lateral mass and articular process.(2) Part of spinous process were removed with bone biting forceps. The side with more severe symptoms was selected as the open side, bone groove was performed at 2-3 mm of the medial edge of bilateral facet joints with the medial cortex was reserved at the shaft side.(3) Slowly lift the lamina and maintained.(4)Determining the opening width of each segment by trial, and selecting the appropriate size Arch miniplate, and fixed with screws.

Locations

Country Name City State
China The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin Heilongjaing
China Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University Jining Shandong
China Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University Pekin Pekin
China The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao Shandong
China Shanghai Changhai Hospital Shanghai Shanghai
China Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Shanghai Shanghai
China Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Shanghai Shanghai
China Shanghai Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University Shanghai Shanghai
China The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai Shanghai
China Peking University Shenzhen Hospital Shenzhen Guangdong
China Shanxi Bethune Hospital Taiyuan Shanxi
China The Second Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University Xi'an Shanxi

Sponsors (12)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Changhai Hospital, Jining Medical University, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Tang-Du Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Tongji Hospital, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (2)

Chen Y, Sun J, Yuan X, Guo Y, Yang H, Chen D, Shi J. Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion With Posterior Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective, Randomized, and Control Study With at Least 1-Year Follow Up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 15;45(16):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003462. — View Citation

Sun K, Wang S, Huan L, Sun J, Xu X, Sun X, Shi J, Guo Y. Analysis of the spinal cord angle for severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: comparison between anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) and posterior laminectomy. Eur Spine J. 2020 May;29(5):1001-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06216-6. Epub 2019 Dec 3. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary C-JOA Recovery Rate (postoperative JOA score at 3 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100% Time point of outcome: 3 months post-operative follow-up visits
Primary C-JOA Recovery Rate (postoperative JOA score at 6 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100% Time point of outcome: 6 months post-operative follow-up visits
Primary C-JOA Recovery Rate (postoperative JOA score at 12 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100% Time point of outcome: 12 months post-operative follow-up visits
Primary C-JOA Recovery Rate (postoperative JOA score at 24 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100% Time point of outcome: 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Secondary Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores Filling in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores scale. This scale involves four aspects: upper limb motor function (range, 0 to 4 points), lower limb motor function (range, 0 to 4 points), sensory function (range, 0 to 6 points), and bladder function (range, 0 to 3 points). The total C-JOA score ranged from 0 (worst) to 17 (normal condition). 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Secondary Visual Analogue Scale Filling in the Visual Analogue Scale pain score that range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe]. 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Secondary Neck Disability Index Filling in the 10-item Neck Disability Index scale that totally range 0 to 50 points, the highest index the worst. 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Secondary Nurick-Score Filling in the 6-level Nurick disability grade scale that range 0 [mild] to 5 [severe]. 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02936245 - Predictors of Outcome and Natural History in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy N/A
Recruiting NCT02005081 - Baxter: Actifuse SHAPE vs DBX in ACC N/A
Completed NCT01407705 - High-Resolution Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) of the Cervical Spinal Cord in the Setting of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) N/A
Recruiting NCT05701059 - Comparison of Artificial Disc Implants in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
Completed NCT05006495 - Comparison Between C3-6 Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty N/A
Completed NCT01868958 - DTI of the Brain and Cervical Spine: Evaluation in Normal Subjects and Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy N/A
Recruiting NCT05242666 - Quantiative MRI and Myelin-PET for the Assessment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02076113 - Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial N/A
Completed NCT05994404 - Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy - Cost Observational Surgical Trial