Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Clinical Results of Adjustable Femoral Loop With Three Different Techniques in Patients Who Underwent Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study
Verified date | November 2021 |
Source | Istanbul University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common injuries of the knee. In today's world, due to developing sports industry , the increase in sports traumas of both genders and ages ACL injuries and treatments are given major priority. The success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction depends on many factors, including the mechanical properties of the graft, positioning of the proper femoral and tibial tunnel, fixation methods and the postoperative rehabilitation. The tendon grafts can be fixed on the femoral side using several fixation devices, including cortical suspension devices, cross pins, and interference screws. Femoral fixation via Cortical button in a suture loop provides the highest primary stability, and therefore, has become increasingly popular among orthopaedic surgeons. Adjustable and fixed Femoral cortical loops are commonly used for femoral fixation. In this sudy we aimed to compare clinical and functional outcomes of three different techniques of suspensory femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | November 15, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | November 15, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 55 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with ACL Rupture between the ages of 18-55 - Patients with isolated + primary ACL rupture only - Patients with ACL rupture ± meniscal tear Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with Posterior cruciate ligament rupture - Multiligamentous knee injuries - Patients with Medial or Lateral Collateral injuries - Patients with previous revision surgeries |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Istanbul University Istanbul Medical Faculty Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology | Istanbul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Emre Kocazeybek |
Turkey,
Ahn HW, Seon JK, Song EK, Park CJ, Lim HA. Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes and Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Fixed and Adjustable Loop Cortical Suspension Devices. Arthroscopy. 2019 Jun;35(6):1736-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.051. Epub 2019 May 6. — View Citation
Boyle MJ, Vovos TJ, Walker CG, Stabile KJ, Roth JM, Garrett WE Jr. Does adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspension loosen after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A retrospective comparative study. Knee. 2015 Sep;22(4):304-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 May 19. — View Citation
Choi NH, Victoroff BN. Author Reply to "Regarding 'Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device With Retensioning and Knot Tying'". Arthroscopy. 2020 Apr;36( — View Citation
Choi NH, Yang BS, Victoroff BN. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: Comparison Between Fixed-Loop and Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Devices. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(4):826-831. doi: 10.1177/0363546516674183. Epub 2016 Nov 25. — View Citation
Onggo JR, Nambiar M, Pai V. Fixed- Versus Adjustable-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2019 Aug;35(8):2484-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.029. Epub 2019 May 27. — View Citation
Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Sep;(198):43-9. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Kt-1000 Stability | The KT1000 arthrometer is designed to measure the anterior translation of the tibia while maintaing the femur in position. The results obtained provide an objective diagnostic of the state of the ACL. The healthy leg will be tested first followed by the injured leg. The side-to-side differences will be then evaluated at each force, which allows the diagnosis of the knee laxity. | 12.months postoperatively | |
Primary | Isokinetic Knee tests | Flexor and Extansor muscle group of the knee | 12.months postoperatively | |
Secondary | IKDC scores | Determining of knee symptoms Function, and activity of daily living | 12.months postoperatively | |
Secondary | Tegner-Lysolm score | This is a clinical functional assessment test used for Ligamentous knee disorders. Including 8 parameters . | 12.months postoperatively | |
Secondary | Postoperative Range of motion | Knee flexion, Extension will be masured by goniometer | 6.months and 12.months postoperatively |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05487768 -
Functional Connectivity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04390035 -
BFRT in Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02740452 -
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02555917 -
Comparison of Remnant Preserving Versus Remnant Resecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00529958 -
Comparison of Three Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05109871 -
Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06048848 -
FNB in ACL Recon Under GA
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06048874 -
FNB in ACL Recon Under SA
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03529552 -
Evaluation After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Using the Bioresorbable Interference Screw (SMS): Resorbability, Per- and Post-operative Complications and Articular Functional Recovery.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04285853 -
Are Opioids Needed After ACL Reconstruction
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04088227 -
Effects of Platelet Rich Plasma Injections on Biomarkers After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03671421 -
Number One Overall Graft Pick? Hamstring vs Bone-Patellar-Tendon-Bone vs Quadriceps Tendon
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04957706 -
Diagnostic Study of ACL Rupture With Anterior Drawer Test at 90° of Hip Flexion
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04953676 -
A Clinical Trial of the Round-tunnel and Flat-tunnel Technique of ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03365908 -
Pain Management of ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06030791 -
BTB Graft Harvest and Donor Site Morbidity After ACL Reconstruction
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03950024 -
Improvement of Knowledge About the Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in the Aftermath of Knee Trauma.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03229369 -
Association of ALL and ACL Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction in High-risk Population: a RCT.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01267435 -
Evaluation of Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position After Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06430775 -
Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
|