Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Single-Use Duodenoscope in a Real-World Setting
| Verified date | July 2022 |
| Source | Ambu A/S |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
This study will assess how the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope performs in procedures that treat problems of the bile and pancreatic ducts.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 248 |
| Est. completion date | February 28, 2022 |
| Est. primary completion date | January 27, 2022 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject is = 18 years old. 2. Subject is indicated and scheduled for an elective, non-emergent ERCP. 3. Subject is willing and able to give informed consent and HIPAA authorization. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject has altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy including: 1. Billroth II 2. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 3. Loop gastric bypass 4. Post-Whipple 5. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy 2. Subject requires an emergency ERCP (emergent decompression procedure within 6-12 hours of presentation to prevent life-threatening sequelae). 3. Subject has any of the following severe co-morbid conditions 1. Morbid obesity (BMI = 40) 2. Unstable cardiopulmonary conditions 3. Severe and uncorrectable coagulopathy 4. Severe and uncorrectable thrombocytopenia 4. Subject has clinically significant esophageal, pyloric or duodenal strictures. 5. Subject has been previously been treated under this investigational plan. 6. Subject is pregnant or female with reproductive capability who is unwilling to have a pre-procedure pregnancy test and use birth control. 7. Subject is actively taking an anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent other than aspirin. 8. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, has a severe comorbidity, poor general physical/mental health and/or a condition that will not allow the subject to be a good study candidate. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | University of Colorado Hospital | Aurora | Colorado |
| United States | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama |
| United States | Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio |
| United States | Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas |
| United States | Indiana University, University Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana |
| United States | NYU Langone Health | New York | New York |
| United States | Southwest Gastroenterology | Oak Lawn | Illinois |
| United States | Mount Sinai South Nassau | Oceanside | New York |
| United States | Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Ambu A/S | Ambu Inc., Infinite Clinical Solutions, Prelude Dynamics |
United States,
Alfa MJ, Olson N, DeGagne P, Jackson M. A survey of reprocessing methods, residual viable bioburden, and soil levels in patient-ready endoscopic retrograde choliangiopancreatography duodenoscopes used in Canadian centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;23(4):198-206. — View Citation
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Faulx AL, Gurudu SR, Kothari S, Lightdale JR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Review. — View Citation
Balan GG, Rosca I, Ursu EL, Fifere A, Varganici CD, Doroftei F, Turin-Moleavin IA, Sandru V, Constantinescu G, Timofte D, Stefanescu G, Trifan A, Sfarti CV. Duodenoscope-Associated Infections beyond the Elevator Channel: Alternative Causes for Difficult Reprocessing. Molecules. 2019 Jun 25;24(12). pii: E2343. doi: 10.3390/molecules24122343. — View Citation
Baron, Kozarek, Carr-Locke, et al. ERCP 3rd Edition. Elsevier. 2019.
Cotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J, Vargo J, Baron T, Tarnasky P, Schutz S, Jacobson B, Bott C, Petersen B. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 Mar 5. — View Citation
Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czakó L, Gyökeres T, Manes G, Meier P, Poley JW, Ponchon T, Tringali A, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Senore C, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rees CJ, Spada C, Valori R, Bisschops R, Rutter MD. Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1448-1460. doi: 10.1177/2050640618808157. Epub 2018 Oct 19. Review. — View Citation
Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20. — View Citation
Lee DH, Kim DB, Kim HY, Baek HS, Kwon SY, Lee MH, Park JC. Increasing potential risks of contamination from repetitive use of endoscope. Am J Infect Control. 2015 May 1;43(5):e13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Feb 25. — View Citation
Petersen BT. Duodenoscope reprocessing: risk and options coming into view. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):484-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.004. — View Citation
Ross AS, Baliga C, Verma P, Duchin J, Gluck M. A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Jun 16. — View Citation
USA FDA: Medical Device Safety: Safety Communications. The FDA Continues to Remind Facilities of the Importance of Following Duodenoscope Reprocessing Instructions: FDA Safety Communication. 12 April 2019.
USA FDA: Medical Device Safety: Safety Communications. The FDA is Recommending Transition to Duodenoscopes with Innovative Designs to Enhance Safety: FDA Safety Communication. 29 August 2019.
* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | To evaluate safety of the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope in ERCP. | Safety will be assessed based on the incidence rates of adverse events based on the seriousness and relatedness to the device and/or procedure. | Day 30 (+3) Post-Procedure | |
| Primary | To evaluate the ERCP procedural success rates with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope when completing the ERCP procedure for the intended indication(s). | Procedure success will be defined as the successful completion of the ERCP procedure with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. The procedural success rate will be the incidence rate of success for the ERCP procedure. | Procedure Completion (Day 0) | |
| Secondary | To establish comprehensive performance attributes of aScope™ Duodeno endoscope through its use by multiple endoscopists in conducting various ERCP procedures. | Procedure success for sub categories of ERCP procedures will be defined as the successful completion of the ERCP procedure with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. The procedural success rate will be the incidence rate of success for the stratified sub-categories of ERCP procedures with the the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. | Procedure Completion (Day 0) | |
| Secondary | To evaluate rate of conversion to a reusable endoscope, other endoscope or an open procedure from the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope during the ERCP procedure. | Rate of conversion will be measured by the incidence rate of when a conversion to a different endoscope or open procedure is necessitated during the ERCP procedure with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. | Procedure Completion (Day 0) | |
| Secondary | To evaluate rate of successful completion of a converted ERCP procedure. | Successful completion will be measured by the incidence rate of success for converted ERCP procedure as stratified by the conversion method (reusable scope, other endoscope, other procedure). | Procedure Completion (Day 0) | |
| Secondary | To evaluate the device deficiency rate for the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. | Incidence rate of device deficiencies as defined as either a device failure or device malfunction for the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope during ERCP procedure. | Procedure Completion (Day 0) | |
| Secondary | To evaluate physician satisfaction with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope. | Physician reported outcomes questionnaire on physician satisfaction with the aScope™ Duodeno endoscope for ERCP procedures. | Procedure Completion (Day 0) |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT00919074 -
Comparison of Double Wire Technique With Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement for Difficult Bile Duct Cannulation
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00937924 -
Adjunct Sedatives in Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Procedures
|
Phase 4 |