Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04453878
Other study ID # 202005109RINB
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2021
Est. completion date October 27, 2021

Study information

Verified date October 2023
Source National Taiwan University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) is believed to be one of the risk factors contributing to shoulder injuries. In addition, athletes with GIRD of greater than 20° appear to be at a greater risk for the shoulder injuries and surgery. Recently, GIRD can be divided in anatomical GIRD and pathological GIRD (pGIRD). The dominant arm of the athletes with pGIRD have not only humeral retrotorsion (HR) but also stiffer posterior capsule. The soft-tissue effect is believed to be the key point in pathological cascade of throwers. Therefore, the previous studies use gross GIRD as a risk factor may be modified by ultrasound-guide corrected GIRD. Objective: There are 4 objectives for the present study: (1) to investigate the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the gross GIRD; (2) to investigate the ROC curves of the ultrasound-guide corrected GIRD; (3) to compare the area under curve (AUC) of the two methods; (4) to compare the gross GIRD and the ultrasound-guide corrected GIRD in baseball players. Design: Baseball players who have played baseball for at least 1 year and still active in training or competition will be recruited in this study. Participant characteristics will be collected by the main assessor, including age, gender, height, weight, dominant arm, practice time, years of playing baseball. Performance/function will be assessed via a Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow (KJOC) self-report questionnaire. The shoulder rotation ROM, ultrasound examination including ultrasound-corrected GIRD and posterior capsular thickness and posterior shoulder tightness will also be measured. we will follow subjects for a season. Once the injury occurs, deterioration or at the end of the season, we will collect the data again. Main outcome measures: The shoulder rotation ROM, ultrasound examination and posterior shoulder tightness are main outcomes of the study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 106
Est. completion date October 27, 2021
Est. primary completion date October 27, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 12 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion criteria: 1. Age range from 12 to 40 years old. 2. Playing baseball for at least 1 year. 3. Still active in training or competition. 4. The frequency of training or game should be at least 3 times per week, 3 hours per time. Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with shoulder pain onset due to trauma. 2. A history of shoulder fractures or dislocation. 3. Cervical radiculopathy. 4. Degenerative joint disease of the shoulder. 5. Surgical interventions on the shoulder. 6. Inflammatory arthropathy.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
National Taiwan University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (1)

1. Olsen SJ, 2nd, Fleisig GS, Dun S, Loftice J, Andrews JR. Risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in adolescent baseball pitchers. The American journal of sports medicine 2006;34:905-12. 2. Makhni EC, Morrow ZS, Luchetti TJ, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Gualtieri AP, Lee RW, et al. Arm pain in youth baseball players: a survey of healthy players. The American journal of sports medicine 2015;43:41-6. 3. Saper MG, Pierpoint LA, Liu W, Comstock RD, Polousky JD, Andrews JR. Epidemiology of Shoulder and Elbow Injuries Among United States High School Baseball Players: School Years 2005-2006 Through 2014-2015. The American journal of sports medicine 2018;46:37-43. 4. Dick R, Sauers EL, Agel J, Keuter G, Marshall SW, McCarty K, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men's baseball injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 2003-2004. J Athl Train 2007;42:183-93. 5. Conte S, Camp CL, Dines JS. Injury Trends in Major League Baseball Over 18 Seasons: 1998-2015. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2016;45:116-23. 6. Lin DJ, Wong TT, Kazam JK. Shoulder Injuries in the Overhead-Throwing Athlete: Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Injury, and Imaging Findings. Radiology 2018;286:370-87. 7. Tyler TF, Nicholas SJ, Lee SJ, Mullaney M, McHugh MP. Correction of posterior shoulder tightness is associated with symptom resolution in patients with internal impingement. The American journal of sports medicine 2010;38:114-9. 8. Wilk KE, Macrina LC, Fleisig GS, Porterfield R, Simpson CD, 2nd, Harker P, et al. Correlation of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and total rotational motion to shoulder injuries in professional baseball pitchers. The American journal of sports medicine 2011;39:329-35. 9. Harryman DT, 2nd, Sidles JA, Clark JM, McQuade KJ, Gibb TD, Matsen FA, 3rd. Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1990;72:1334-43. 10. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Physical therapy 2000;80:276-91. 11. Lin JJ, Hanten WP, Olson SL, Roddey TS, Soto-quijano DA, Lim HK, et al. Functional activity characteristics of individuals with shoulder dysfunctions. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology 2005;15:576-86. 12. Itoi E, Motzkin NE, Morrey BF, An KN. Scapular inclination and inferior stability of the shoulder. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 1992;1:131-9. 13. Paley KJ, Jobe FW, Pink MM, Kvitne RS, ElAttrache NS. Arthroscopic findings in the overhand throwing athlete: evidence for posterior internal impingement of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association 2000;16:35-40. 14. Warner JJ, Micheli LJ, Arslanian LE, Kennedy J, Kennedy R. Scapulothoracic motion in normal shoulders and shoulders with glenohumeral instability and impingement syndrome. A study using Moire topographic analysis. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1992:191-9. 15. Weiser WM, Lee TQ, McMaster WC, McMahon PJ. Effects of simulated scapular protraction on anterior glenohumeral stability. The American journal of sports medicine 1999;27:801-5. 16. Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report. International journal of sports physical therapy 2012;7:306-13.

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary alteration of ultrasound-guide corrected GIRD The participants will be told to supine with 90° of shoulder abduction and elbow flexion. The main assessor places the transducer on the subject's anterior shoulder, perpendicular to the long axis of the humerus in the frontal plane. Then, the humerus will be manually rotated by the assessor for the bicipital groove being centered on the ultrasound image. The ultrasound is then positioned, aided by use of a grid on the ultrasound display. Thus, a line connecting the greater and lesser tubercles can be parallel to the horizontal plane. Last, the second assessor places a digital inclinometer on the ulnar side of the forearm to record the forearm inclination angle, defining the amount of humeral retroversion. This measurement will be repeated 3 times bilaterally and the average will be used for data analysis. The equation of ultrasound-guide corrected GIRD will be gross GIRD minus difference of humeral retroversion between dominant and non-dominant arm. through study completion, an average of 1 year
Primary alteration of posterior capsular thickness The subject will be positioned upright in a chair with the arm at the side and forearm resting on the thigh. The examiner positions a transducer on the posterior shoulder, visualizing the glenoid labrum, humeral head, rotator cuff, and posterior capsule, defined as the tissue immediately lateral to the tip of the labrum between the humeral head and rotator cuff. When the capsule is identified, the image is paused, and the capsule thickness will be measured by built-in caliper. The imaging procedure will be repeated 3 times, and an average thickness will be determined. This measurement will be taken bilaterally for all subjects. through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary change of shoulder rotation ROM Subjects will be placed in supine with the shoulder at 90° of abduction and elbow at 90° of flexion. The main assessor stabilizes the scapula then passively rotating the forearm internally or externally until end feel is reached. Another assessor places a digital inclinometer on the dorsal or the ventral side of the forearm to record the data. Each measurement will be performed 3 times both in the dominant and non-dominant arm, and the average data on the dominant and non-dominant sides will be used for analysis. The total rotation ROM will be the sum of the IR and external rotation. through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Injury assessment and classification The process will be modified according to the previous studies. The players will be prospectively tracked for overuse shoulder injuries throughout the season. For the asymptomatic subjects, any complaint of shoulder problems reported by coach, parents or player will be evaluated by a physical therapist to verify the injury. Moreover, less than 70 KJOC score will be recognized as injury. Injury that does not occur during participation or unrelated to baseball will be excluded. For the symptomatic subject, if he feels exacerbation of the symptom, he will be told to report KJOC score again. Once the decreased score is over 30, the subject will be recognized as injury. up to 24 weeks
Secondary change of posterior shoulder tightness To begin the test, the tester grasps the subject's extremity distal to the epicondyles of the elbow in supine position. The humerus will be passively moved into the starting position of 90° of flexion (if not possible, maximal flexion position) and 0° of adduction with neutral rotation for assessment of posterior shoulder tightness. At this point, the scapula will be palpated at the lateral border and stabilized with the hand. While the scapula is stabilized, the humerus is then passively moved into a cross-chest adduction with neutral rotation. The humerus is moved until the movement cease (firm end-feel), indicating the end of shoulder tissue flexibility. The recorder places the digital inclinometer parallel to the humerus next to the medial epicondyle. The measured angle indicates the amount of flexibility of the posterior shoulder tissues. A greater angle indicates more flexibility of the shoulder tissue. through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary change of Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score (KJOC) The KJOC is the most common questionnaire for overhead athletes which has been conducted in several studies. Recently, Major League Baseball (MLB) organization also adopts this evaluation tool as the standard for the recovery of injuries in MLB players. The questionnaire is commonly used to assess shoulder function and performance. It is valid, reliable in its pilot form, and responsive in the tested population of adult overhead athletes. KJOC questionnaire range from 0 to 100 and the lower score represents limited function. through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary days in the disable list The number of days that players cannot participate in the training or game due to injury will be recorded. through study completion, an average of 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05108311 - Effectiveness of a Novel Protocol for Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit in General Population With Shoulder Pain N/A
Completed NCT04894786 - MIRM Versus PIRT in Athletes With Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04255355 - Comparing the Effects of Pelvic Alignment Versus Diaphragmatic Breathing on Shoulder Range of Motion N/A
Completed NCT05761990 - Novel Stretching Versus Post Isometric Relaxation Techniques On Shoulder Disability In Athletes N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04687696 - Comparison of The Effects of Different Stretching Techniques in Overhead Athletes N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04687683 - Comparison of Immediate Effects of Different Shoulder Stretching Techniques in Overhead Athletes N/A
Completed NCT03246867 - The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Methods in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome N/A