Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) At Week 16 Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria (for High Grade Glioma [HGG] Only), by Investigator Assessment |
ORR at Week 16 was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters [SOD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1 at 16 Weeks. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: sum of products of diameters [SPD] decreased by = 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information. |
Up to 16 weeks |
|
Secondary |
ORR Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO Criteria (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by = 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information. |
Up to approximately 21 months |
|
Secondary |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment |
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of study drug until the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG) or death (whichever occurs first). |
Up to approximately 21 months |
|
Secondary |
Best Overall Response (BOR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment |
BOR is defined as the participant's best confirmed response (CR or PR) over the treatment period as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1 or RANO. As per RECIST 1.1, CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. For participants with HGG, response will be assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by = 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information. |
Up to approximately 21 months |
|
Secondary |
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment |
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first documented CR or PR to the date first documentation of progressive disease or death (whichever occurs first). As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. For participants with HGG, response will be assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by = 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information. |
Up to approximately 21 months |
|
Secondary |
Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment |
DCR was defined as a BOR of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD). To be assigned a BOR of SD, the time from the first administration of study drug until the date of documented SD should be =7 weeks. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response was based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by = 50% from baseline value and SD: SPD <50% decreased from baseline, but <25% increased from nadir) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information. |
Up to approximately 21 months |
|
Secondary |
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment |
CBR was defined as a BOR of CR or PR, or durable SD (Duration of SD should be =23 weeks since the first dose of the study treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For participants with HGG, response is assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response was based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by = 50% from baseline value and SD: SPD <50% decreased from baseline, but <25% increased from nadir) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information. |
Up to approximately 21 months |
|
Secondary |
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is reported. |
Up to approximately 21 months |
|
Secondary |
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is reported. |
Up to approximately 20 months |
|
Secondary |
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Taste Category |
A hedonic Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the supplemental Statistical Analysis Plan (sSAP), all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the taste category is presented. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Appearance Category |
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the appearance category is presented. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Smell Category |
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the smell category is presented. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Mouth Feel Category |
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the mouth feel category is presented. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Overall Acceptability Category |
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the overall acceptability category is presented. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Lenvatinib at Steady State (AUCss) |
Blood samples were taken predose and at specified times postdose on Days 1-28 to determine the AUCss of Lenvatinib. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 (0.5-4 and 6-10 hours post-dose), Cycle 1 Day 15 (pre-dose, 0.5-4, and 6-10 hours post-dose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose). A cycle is 28 days. |
|