Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Epoch 2: Total Serum Trough Levels of Immune Globulin G (IgG) Antibodies During Period 2 |
Total serum trough levels of IgG antibodies measured during period 2 of Epoch 2 were assessed. |
Epoch 2 (period 2): Up to 24 weeks |
|
Primary |
Epoch 3: Total Serum Trough Levels of IgG Antibodies |
Total serum trough levels of IgG antibodies measured during Epoch 3 were assessed. |
Epoch 3: Up to Week 12 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 1: Total Serum Trough Levels of IgG Antibodies |
Total serum trough levels of IgG antibodies measured during Epoch 1 were assessed. |
Epoch 1: Up to Week 13 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to Last Interval (AUC0-last) for Total Serum Levels of IgG |
|
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: AUC0-last for Total Serum Levels of IgG Subclasses |
Total serum levels of IgG subclasses IgG 1, IgG 2, IgG 3, and IgG 4 were determined. |
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) for Total Serum Levels of IgG |
|
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: CL/F for Total Serum Levels of IgG Subclasses |
Total serum levels of IgG subclasses IgG 1, IgG 2, IgG 3, and IgG 4 were determined. |
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Total Serum Levels of IgG |
|
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Cmax for Total Serum Levels of IgG Subclasses |
Total serum levels of IgG subclasses IgG 1, IgG 2, IgG 3, and IgG 4 were determined. |
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Minimum Concentration (Cmin) for Total Serum Levels of IgG |
|
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Cmin for Total Serum Levels of IgG Subclasses |
Total serum levels of IgG subclasses IgG 1, IgG 2, IgG 3, and IgG 4 were determined. |
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Total Serum Levels of IgG |
|
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Epoch 2: Tmax for Total Serum Levels of IgG Subclasses |
Total serum levels of IgG subclasses IgG 1, IgG 2, IgG 3, and IgG 4 were determined. |
Epoch 2: Week 21 |
|
Secondary |
Trough Levels of Specific Antibodies to Clinically Relevant Pathogens: Clostridium Tetani Toxoid and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) |
Trough levels of specific antibodies to clinically relevant pathogen (Clostridium tetani toxoid and HBV) were assessed in Epoch 1, Epoch 2 and Epoch 3. Data was analyzed per interval in each Epoch for this outcome measure. |
Epoch 1 (Week 1); Epoch 2 (Week 1, 24); Epoch 3 (Week 1, 13) |
|
Secondary |
Trough Levels of Specific Antibodies to Clinically Relevant Pathogen: Haemophilus Influenzae (HIB) |
Trough levels of specific antibodies to clinically relevant pathogens (HIB) were assessed in Epoch 1, Epoch 2, and Epoch 3. Data was analyzed per interval in each Epoch for this outcome measure. |
Epoch 1 (Week 1); Epoch 2 (Week 1, 24); Epoch 3 (Week 1, 13) |
|
Secondary |
Health Related Quality of Life: Treatment Preference |
Treatment preference questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess participants' preference towards the administration of new IGSC therapy. There are 4-items on the questionnaire, which investigate a participant's preference on the clinic/hospital/home setting of receiving the immunoglobulin therapy, the participant's rating on the frequency and method of administration, and the participant's preference to continue receiving the IGSC treatment. The questionnaire included following categories: Where do you prefer to receive your immunoglobulin therapy, The frequency of administration, as pre-specified in protocol, data is reported as per age (2-13 years and >=14 years). |
Up to approximately 1.5 years |
|
Secondary |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) |
TEAEs was defined as adverse events (AEs) with onset after date-time of first dose of study drug, or medical conditions present prior to the start of IP but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of IP. Any TEAE that is recorded by the investigator as "possibly related" or "probably related" to IP was considered as IGSC, 20%-related AE, and any AE recorded as "unlikely related" or "not related" was considered as unrelated AE. AEs included vital signs, clinical laboratory measurements. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Number of Participants With Tolerability Events Related to the Infusion of Study Drug |
An infusion is considered tolerable if the infusion rate was not reduced, or the infusion was not interrupted or stopped, due to TEAE related to study drug (IGIV or IGSC) infusion. A tolerability event is considered to have occurred if an infusion was not tolerable in Epoch 1, Epoch 2 and Epoch 3. Number of participants with tolerability events related to infusion of IP were assessed. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Annual Rate of Validated Acute Serious Bacterial Infections (ASBI) |
The ASBI rate was calculated as the mean number of acute serious bacterial infections per participants per year. Annual rate of validated acute serious bacterial infections per participant was assessed. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Annual Rate of All Infections Per Year |
Annual rate is the number of participants reporting any infection per year. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Number of Days Participants Not Able to Attend School or Work to Perform Normal Daily Activities Due to Illness/Infection |
Number of days not able to attend school or work to perform normal daily activities due to illness/infection are standardized per year (365.25 days). The number of days not able to attend school or work to perform normal daily activities due to illness/infection were assessed. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Number of Days Participants Were on Antibiotics |
Number of days on antibiotics is defined as the number of days those antibiotics were taken as concomitant medications and is standardized to per year (365.25 days). Antibiotics are defined as any medication under anatomical therapeutic chemical Level 2 therapeutic class "ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE". If a participant took multiple antibiotics on a single day, that day is counted for only once. Protocol defined prophylactic antibiotics for viral, fungal or protozoal infections (e.g. trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole twice a week for pneumocystis) which are not treated by immunoglobulin, were excluded from this analysis. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Number of Participants Hospitalized Due to Illness or Infection |
Number of participants with hospitalization are standardized to per year (365.25 days). A hospitalization is counted for a specific epoch only if that hospitalization started during that epoch. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Length of Hospital Stay |
Length of hospital stay per stay is standardized to per year (365.25 days). A hospitalization is counted for a specific epoch only if that hospitalization started during that epoch. |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Number of Acute Physician Visits Due to Illness/Infection |
Number of acute physician visits is standardized to per year (365.25 days). |
From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Total Scale Score |
Peds-QL=generic HR QoL instrument designed specifically for pediatrics has domains as:general health/activities,feelings/emotional,social functioning,school functioning.In this study,2-7 years (parent as observer),8-13 years (participant as observer) for Peds-QL health questionnaire was analyzed.Higher scores=better QOL for all domains.This modular instrument used 5-point scale:0(never) to 4(almost always).Items are reversed scored;linearly transformed to 0-100 scale as follows:0=100,1=75,2=50,3=25,4=0.4 dimensions(physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored.PEDS-QL Total Scale Score has 0-100 scale,higher scores=better HRQoL. |
Baseline up to end of study (approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Total Scale Score |
EQ-5D-3L health questionnaire=participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions -mobility,self-care,usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. n this study, 2-11 years (parent as observer),12 years and older (participant as observer) for EQ-5D-3L health questionnaire was analyzed.Health state index score range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome.EQ visual analogue scale range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health status.Data is reported as per age groups (2-11 years and >=12 years). |
Baseline up to end of the study (approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Score |
SF-36=generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess HRQL of participants.In this study, 14 years and older (participant as observer) for SF-36 health questionnaire was analyzed. Generic instruments are used in general populations to assess a wide range of domains applicable to a variety of health states, conditions, and diseases.SF-36=36 items aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100.Higher scores=better HRQL. As pre-specified in protocol data is reported for participants with age group of 14 years or older. |
Baseline up to end of the study (approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Health Related Quality of Life: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9) Score |
TSQM=is a global satisfaction scale used to assess the overall level of participant's satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their medications. In this study, 2-12 years (parent as observer), 13 years and older (participant as observer) for TSQM health questionnaire will be analyzed. TSQM-9 is a 9-item, validated, self-administered instrument used to assess participant's satisfaction with medication. The three domains assessed are effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction. The score of each of the 3 domains is based on an algorithm to create a score of 0 to 100. Higher score indicated greater satisfaction in that domain. As pre-specified in protocol, data is reported as per age group (2-12 years and >=13 years). |
Baseline up to end of the study (approximately 1.5 years) |
|
Secondary |
Health Related Quality of Life: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Life Quality Index (LQI) Score |
LQI=self-administered questionnaire developed specifically for participants/legal guardians involved in IGIV treatments.2-13 years (parent as observer),14 years and older (participant as observer) for LQI health questionnaire was analyzed.LQI=15-items, divided into 4 domains: treatment interferences(TI)[6 items],therapy-related problems(TRP)[4 items],therapy setting(TS)[3 items];treatment costs(TC)[2 items].Items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1:"Extremely bad" to 7:"Extremely good".Total scores=0 to 100,higher scores=highest possible satisfaction with factors such as independence,therapy convenience,social/school/work activities;health and travel costs.As pre-specified in protocol, data is reported as per age (2-13 years and >=14 years).All-Treated Set included all enrolled participants of age group '2-13 years' and '>=14 years' who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC).'n'=Number analysed are participants with data available for analysis. |
Baseline up to end of the study (approximately 1.5 years) |
|