Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04344704
Other study ID # DX01
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2, 2018
Est. completion date March 2023

Study information

Verified date April 2020
Source Trialance SCCL
Contact Xavier Molina Figueras, PharmD, PhD
Phone +34 689900009
Email xmolina@trialance.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Prevention of inappropriate therapies and serious adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events with a single chamber implantable defibrillator with DX floating dipole atrial detection


Description:

Prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, international study in a population with an accepted indication for an implantable automatic defibrillator.

The main objective is to know the different values of the rates of inappropriate therapies, of serious cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events, and of the appropriate detections in single-chamber ICD devices, with optimized programming according to the patient's arrhythmic history, using the three discrimination methods. arrhythmias: Smart, Onset and Stability, and Morphmatch.

The device under investigation is a single chamber with a floating atrial dipole for the detection of atrial signals.

Patients who are included in the study will present an indication for an automatic cardioverter-defibrillator device according to clinical practice guidelines for an ICD and who also do not have an indication for permanent stimulation in the right atrium. For this reason, the indication of patients will be those that require an ICD without the implantation of an electrode in the atrium, that is, single-chamber ICDs or DX ICDs since both, from the therapeutic point of view, are equivalent.

The centers will follow standard clinical practice to diagnose patients


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 462
Est. completion date March 2023
Est. primary completion date September 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with an indication of a single chamber ICD due to high risk of sudden death.

- Patients with and without a prior history of AF.

- Patients with indication for primary and secondary prevention.

- Device optimized for the discrimination of supraventricular events.

- DX device implant with single floating cable.

- Activation of "Home Monitoring" function.

- Over 18 years.

- Signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Indication for permanent atrial pacing according to current pacing guidelines.

- Congestive heart failure grade IV.

- Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

- Patients with a previous device.

- Permanent Atrial Fibrillation.

- Life expectancy less than 12 months.

- Pregnant or lactating women.

- Patients who are unable to understand the nature of the study.

- Subjects with irreversible brain damage caused by pre-existing brain disease.

- Heart transplant 6 months prior to recruitment or expected in the next 3 months.

- Cardiac surgery 3 months prior to recruitment or planned for the next 3 months.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Prevention of Inappropriate Therapies and MACCE. Single-chamber ICD

Intervention

Other:
Single chamber DAI device with floating atrial dipole
DAI for the detection of atrial signals with optimized programming, using Smart, Onset & Stability, and Morphmatch methods

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña A Coruña
Spain Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona Barcelona
Spain Hospital Universitario de Donostia Donostia Guipúzcoa
Spain Hospital Universitario de Araba Gasteiz / Vitoria Alava
Spain Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta Girona
Spain Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge L'Hospitalet De Llobregat Barcelona
Spain Hospital San Pedro Logroño
Spain Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria Málaga
Spain Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias Santa Cruz De Tenerife Tenerife
Spain Hospital Universitario Clínico de Santiago Santiago De Compostela A Coruña
Spain Hospital Universitario de Tarragona Joan XXIII Tarragona
Spain Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe Valencia
Spain Hospital Clínico y Universitario de Valladolid Valladolid
Spain Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro Vigo Pontevedra

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Trialance SCCL

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (25)

Auricchio A, Hudnall JH, Schloss EJ, Sterns LD, Kurita T, Meijer A, Fagan DH, Rogers T. Inappropriate shocks in single-chamber and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):197 — View Citation

Boersma L, Barr C, Knops R, Theuns D, Eckardt L, Neuzil P, Scholten M, Hood M, Kuschyk J, Jones P, Duffy E, Husby M, Stein K, Lambiase PD; EFFORTLESS Investigator Group. Implant and Midterm Outcomes of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillat — View Citation

Boles U, Gul EE, Fitzgerald L, Sadiq Ali F, Nolan C, Aldworth-Gaumond K, Redfearn DR, Baranchuk A, Glover B, Simpson C, Abdollah H, Michael KA. Standardized programming to reduce the burden of inappropriate therapies in implantable cardioverter defibrilla — View Citation

Cay S, Canpolat U, Ucar F, Ozeke O, Ozcan F, Topaloglu S, Aras D. Programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy zones to high ranges to prevent delivery of inappropriate device therapies in patients with primary prevention: results from the R — View Citation

Defaye P, Boveda S, Klug D, Beganton F, Piot O, Narayanan K, Périer MC, Gras D, Fauchier L, Bordachar P, Algalarrondo V, Babuty D, Deharo JC, Leclercq C, Marijon E, Sadoul N; DAI-PP Investigators. Dual- vs. single-chamber defibrillators for primary preven — View Citation

Friedman PA, Bradley D, Koestler C, Slusser J, Hodge D, Bailey K, Kusumoto F, Munger TM, Militanu A, Glikson M. A prospective randomized trial of single- or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to minimize inappropriate shock risk in prima — View Citation

Guédon-Moreau L, Kouakam C, Klug D, Marquié C, Brigadeau F, Boulé S, Blangy H, Lacroix D, Clémenty J, Sadoul N, Kacet S. Decreased delivery of inappropriate shocks achieved by remote monitoring of ICD: a substudy of the ECOST trial. J Cardiovasc Electroph — View Citation

Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J M — View Citation

Kloppe A, Proclemer A, Arenal A, Lunati M, Martìnez Ferrer JB, Hersi A, Gulaj M, Wijffels MC, Santi E, Manotta L, Mangoni L, Gasparini M. Efficacy of long detection interval implantable cardioverter-defibrillator settings in secondary prevention populatio — View Citation

Kolb C, Sturmer M, Sick P, Reif S, Davy JM, Molon G, Schwab JO, Mantovani G, Dan D, Lennerz C, Borri-Brunetto A, Babuty D. Reduced risk for inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks with dual-chamber therapy compared with single-chamber — View Citation

Konstantino Y, Haim M, Boxer J, Goldenberg I, Feldman A, Michowitz Y, Glikson M, Suleiman M; Israeli Working Group on Pacing and Electrophysiology. Clinical Outcomes of Single- versus Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Lessons from the — View Citation

Kreuz J, Balta O, Liliegren N, Mellert F, Esmailzadeh B, Nickenig G, Schwab JO. Incidence and characteristics of appropriate and inappropriate therapies in recipients of ICD implanted for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Pacing Clin Electrophys — View Citation

Kutyifa V, Moss AJ, Schuger C, McNitt S, Polonsky B, Ruwald AH, Ruwald MH, Daubert JP, Zareba W. Reduction in Inappropriate ICD Therapy in MADIT-RIT Patients Without History of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;26(8):879-884. d — View Citation

Miller DJ, Khan MA, Schultz LR, Simpson JR, Katramados AM, Russman AN, Mitsias PD. Outpatient cardiac telemetry detects a high rate of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2013 Jan 15;324(1-2):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.10.001. Epu — View Citation

Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, Brown MW, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Estes NA 3rd, Greenberg H, Hall WJ, Huang DT, Kautzner J, Klein H, McNitt S, Olshansky B, Shoda M, Wilber D, Zareba W; MADIT-RIT Trial Investigators. Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mort — View Citation

Oginosawa Y, Kohno R, Honda T, Kikuchi K, Nozoe M, Uchida T, Minamiguchi H, Sonoda K, Ogawa M, Ideguchi T, Kizaki Y, Nakamura T, Oba K, Higa S, Yoshida K, Tsunoda S, Fujino Y, Abe H. Superior Rhythm Discrimination With the SmartShock Technology Algorithm — View Citation

Schwab JO, Bonnemeier H, Kleemann T, Brachmann J, Fischer S, Birkenhauer F, Eberhardt F. Reduction of inappropriate ICD therapies in patients with primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: DECREASE study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Dec;104(12):1021-32. doi: — View Citation

Sterns LD, Meine M, Kurita T, Meijer A, Auricchio A, Ando K, Leng CT, Okumura K, Sapp JL, Brown ML, Lexcen DR, Gerritse B, Schloss EJ. Extended detection time to reduce shocks is safe in secondary prevention patients: The secondary prevention substudy of — View Citation

Sticherling C, Zabel M, Spencker S, Meyerfeldt U, Eckardt L, Behrens S, Niehaus M; ADRIA Investigators. Comparison of a novel, single-lead atrial sensing system with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system in patients without antibrad — View Citation

Tayal AH, Tian M, Kelly KM, Jones SC, Wright DG, Singh D, Jarouse J, Brillman J, Murali S, Gupta R. Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke. Neurology. 2008 Nov 18;71(21):1696-701. doi: 10.1212/01.w — View Citation

van Rees JB, Borleffs CJ, de Bie MK, Stijnen T, van Erven L, Bax JJ, Schalij MJ. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 1;57(5):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2 — View Citation

Vanhees L, Kornaat M, Defoor J, Aufdemkampe G, Schepers D, Stevens A, Van Exel H, Van Den Beld J, Heidbüchel H, Fagard R. Effect of exercise training in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Eur Heart J. 2004 Jul;25(13):1120-6. — View Citation

Wilkoff BL, Fauchier L, Stiles MK, Morillo CA, Al-Khatib SM, Almendral J, Aguinaga L, Berger RD, Cuesta A, Daubert JP, Dubner S, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Fenelon G, Garcia FC, Gasparini M, Haines DE, Healey JS, Hurtwitz JL, Keegan R, Kolb C, Kuck KH, — View Citation

Worden NE, Alqasrawi M, Krothapalli SM, Mazur A. "Two for the Price of One": A Single-Lead Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System with a Floating Atrial Dipole. J Atr Fibrillation. 2016 Apr 30;8(6):1396. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1396. eCollection 2016 Ap — View Citation

Ziegler PD, Rogers JD, Ferreira SW, Nichols AJ, Richards M, Koehler JL, Sarkar S. Long-term detection of atrial fibrillation with insertable cardiac monitors in a real-world cryptogenic stroke population. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:175-179. doi: 10.101 — View Citation

* Note: There are 25 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The combined rate of inappropriate therapies and serious adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) single-chamber devices with floating atrial dipole with the Smart function activated determine the combined rate is not less than in single-chamber devices without atrial detection using any of the supraventricular arrhythmia discrimination modalities: Onset and Stability, and Morphmatch. 24 months
Secondary Inappropriate therapies distribution According to the type of indication for an ICD in primary and secondary prevention 24 months
Secondary Programming adjustment justification Adjustments suggested by the European Heart Rhythm Association 24 months
Secondary Distribution of inappropriate therapies by chosen schedule 24 months
Secondary Proportion of appropriate and inappropriate diagnoses By diagnosis group 24 months
Secondary Differences in events according to Onset & Stability method versus Morphmatch method Events in single chamber programming without floating dipole 24 months
Secondary Appropriate therapies by group and by indication Portion of appropriate therapies 24 months
Secondary Triggers of Inappropriate therapies 24 months
Secondary Patients presenting atrial fibrillation before inclusion percentage 24 months
Secondary Patients with no prior history of atrial fibrillation (AF) who have AF during study follow-up Percentage 24 months
Secondary General atrial load in patients with and without previous manifestation of atrial fibrillation 24 months
Secondary Percentage of patients with clinical AF (atrial fibrillation) versus subclinical AF (<6 minutes duration). Clinical AF meaning > 6 minutes duration and subclinical AF meaning <6 minutes duration 24 months
Secondary Cerebrovascular events presenting previous episodes of atrial fibrillation Rate 24 months