Stroke Workflow and Clinical Outcome Parameters Clinical Trial
— ALERTOfficial title:
Automated Detection and Triage of Large Vessel Occlusions Using Artificial Intelligence for Early and Rapid Treatment (ALERT)
Post Market, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, multi center data collection study to evaluate the use of Viz versus the standard of care in stroke workflow and clinical outcome parameters.
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Enrollment | 500 |
| Est. completion date | December 31, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: A subject must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be included in the study: 1. Age of 18 years or greater. 2. Signs and symptoms consistent with the diagnosis of a stroke. 3. Stroke protocol imaging (CTA) with a confirmed presence of anterior LVO via Viz. Exclusion Criteria: A subject may not be included in the study if any of the following exclusion criteria are met: 1. Poor or incomplete CTA imaging data. 2. Disagreement between neuroradiologist and stroke specialist or neurointerventionalist relative to presence of a stroke. 3. Other serious, advanced, or terminal illness (investigator judgment) requiring treatment that significantly delays initiating transfer and/or treatment for stroke. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center-Torrance | Torrance | California |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Providence Little Company of Mary-Torrance | Viz.ai, Inc. |
United States,
Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Delling FN, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jiménez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Lutsey PL, Mackey JS, Matchar DB, Matsushita K, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, O'Flaherty M, Palaniappan LP, Pandey A, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Ritchey MD, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Review. Erratum in: Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12 ):e493. — View Citation
Goyal M, Jadhav AP, Bonafe A, Diener H, Mendes Pereira V, Levy E, Baxter B, Jovin T, Jahan R, Menon BK, Saver JL; SWIFT PRIME investigators. Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment and the Effects on Outcome in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results from the SWIFT PRIME Randomized Controlled Trial. Radiology. 2016 Jun;279(3):888-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160204. Epub 2016 Apr 19. — View Citation
Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, Donnan GA, Roos YB, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener HC, van den Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millán M, Davis SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Román LS, Ribó M, Beumer D, Stouch B, Brown S, Campbell BC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, Jovin TG; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. Epub 2016 Feb 18. — View Citation
Khatri P, Yeatts SD, Mazighi M, Broderick JP, Liebeskind DS, Demchuk AM, Amarenco P, Carrozzella J, Spilker J, Foster LD, Goyal M, Hill MD, Palesch YY, Jauch EC, Haley EC, Vagal A, Tomsick TA; IMS III Trialists. Time to angiographic reperfusion and clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an analysis of data from the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III) phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):567-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70066-3. Epub 2014 Apr 27. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Non-Interventional Centers | Non-Interventional Centers: Evaluate the Door-In to Door-Out (DIDO) time for subjects in which Viz was utilized versus standard of care. | Time of subject presentation through up to 90 days post treatment. | |
| Primary | Interventional Centers | Interventional Centers: Evaluate the Door-In to Groin Puncture time for subjects in which Viz was utilized versus standard of care. | Time of subject presentation through up to 90 days post treatment. | |
| Secondary | Workflow Endpoints | All endpoints will be evaluated for the rate of differences per arm and cohort assignment. Data related to the overall volume and rates of LVOs evaluated by Viz will be summarized. Data related to the overall volume and rates of treatments (TPA, endovascular intervention) will be summarized. | Time of subject presentation through up to 90 days post treatment. |