Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Clinical Trial
Official title:
Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: Hamstring Versus Quadriceps Tendon Autograft
Verified date | October 2019 |
Source | Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The use of hamstrings and quadriceps autografts as an alternative option for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament has good clinical results: however, both techniques have not been compared among them, which is why this study is intended. The use of quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament repair presents similar or better results compared to autograft of the hamstrings. The objective of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the use of quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring autograft.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 28 |
Est. completion date | February 20, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | February 20, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18 years and 45 years - Anterior cruciate ligament injury diagnosed clinically and by image (magnetic resonance) - Patients with or without associated meniscal injury - Patients without previous ACL reconstruction surgery - Patients with previous informed Consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with multiligamentous injury - Patients who have diagnosis of moderate or severe ostearthritis - Patients with chronic degenerative diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypertension) - Patients with contralateral ACL injury. Elimination criteria - Patients that for own initiative, wants to stop participating - Patients who didn't complete all follow-up appointments. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Mexico | Facultad de Medicina UANL | Monterrey | Nuevo Leon |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon |
Mexico,
Lynch TS, Parker RD, Patel RM, Andrish JT; MOON Group, Spindler KP, Amendola A, Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Huston LJ, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, Wolf BR, Wright RW. The Impact of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Research on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Orthopaedic Practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Mar;23(3):154-63. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00005. Epub 2015 Feb 9. Review. — View Citation
Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Mar;66(3):344-52. — View Citation
Prodromos CC, Fu FH, Howell SM, Johnson DH, Lawhorn K. Controversies in soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: grafts, bundles, tunnels, fixation, and harvest. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Jul;16(7):376-84. — View Citation
Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Takai S. Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex. The effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med. 1991 May-Jun;19(3):217-25. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Lysholm knee score | Assessment tool for the results of ACL reconstruction even though it only measures activities of daily living. Higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disability. | up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months) | |
Secondary | IKDC subjective score | International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) assess patients with a variety of knee disorders including ligamentous and meniscal injuries as well as patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis. 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms). | up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months) | |
Secondary | SF-12 physical domain | The 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a general health questionnaire that was first published in 1995 as part of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS). Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The scores may be reported as Z-scores (difference compared to the population average, measured in standard deviations). The United States population average PCS-12 and MCS-12 are both 50 points. The United States population standard deviation is 10 points. So each 10 increment of 10 points above or below 50, corresponds to one standard deviation away from the average. |
up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months) | |
Secondary | SF-12 mental domain | The 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a general health questionnaire that was first published in 1995 as part of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS). Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The scores may be reported as Z-scores (difference compared to the population average, measured in standard deviations). The United States population average PCS-12 and MCS-12 are both 50 points. The United States population standard deviation is 10 points. So each 10 increment of 10 points above or below 50, corresponds to one standard deviation away from the average. |
up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months) | |
Secondary | Flexion (degrees) | Range of motion in degrees | up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months) | |
Secondary | Extension (degrees) | Range of motion in degrees | up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months) | |
Secondary | Thigh circumference (cm) | Circumference (cm) | up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05487768 -
Functional Connectivity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04390035 -
BFRT in Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02740452 -
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02555917 -
Comparison of Remnant Preserving Versus Remnant Resecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00529958 -
Comparison of Three Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05109871 -
Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06048848 -
FNB in ACL Recon Under GA
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06048874 -
FNB in ACL Recon Under SA
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03529552 -
Evaluation After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Using the Bioresorbable Interference Screw (SMS): Resorbability, Per- and Post-operative Complications and Articular Functional Recovery.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04285853 -
Are Opioids Needed After ACL Reconstruction
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04088227 -
Effects of Platelet Rich Plasma Injections on Biomarkers After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03671421 -
Number One Overall Graft Pick? Hamstring vs Bone-Patellar-Tendon-Bone vs Quadriceps Tendon
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04953676 -
A Clinical Trial of the Round-tunnel and Flat-tunnel Technique of ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04957706 -
Diagnostic Study of ACL Rupture With Anterior Drawer Test at 90° of Hip Flexion
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03365908 -
Pain Management of ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06030791 -
BTB Graft Harvest and Donor Site Morbidity After ACL Reconstruction
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03950024 -
Improvement of Knowledge About the Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in the Aftermath of Knee Trauma.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03229369 -
Association of ALL and ACL Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction in High-risk Population: a RCT.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01267435 -
Evaluation of Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position After Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06430775 -
Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
|