Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04100733 |
Other study ID # |
SEALS Xpert |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
April 2027 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2023 |
Source |
Aarhus University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The study aims to evaluate the potential clinical impact of a highly sensitive urinary
marker, the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor, regarding possible reduction in number of flexible
cystoscopies in an outpatient setting without decreasing recurrence-free survival or
increasing risk of progression.
Description:
Epidemiology and treatment Bladder cancer is the 12th most diagnosed cancer worldwide with an
incidence of approximately 550 000 new cases each year.1 A majority of the tumors are
characterized as non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), meaning stage T1 according to
the 2016 TNM-classification.2 Treatment of primary NMIBC is transurethral resection of the
bladder (TUR-B) and treatment of recurring NMIBC is repeated TUR-B and often adjuvant
instillation therapy with either Mitomycin C or Bacillus Calmette-Geerin (BCG) according to
the histology of the tumor. NMIBC-tumors are graded into high grade (HG) and low grade (LG)
according to the histological characteristics of their TUR-B specimen. Generally,
intravesical Mitomycin C is recommended to treat LG tumors and intravesical BCG is
recommended for treating HG tumors.3,4.
Follow-up schedules based on risk of recurrence. The histological grade, number of tumors,
tumor size, T-stage, recurrence-rate and presence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) is used to
estimate risk of recurrence according to the EORTC-scoring system. Based on the risk
stratification, different follow-up schedules after initial TUR-B are planned. High risk
tumors are followed-up with flexible cystoscopy and urinary cytology every four months until
two recurrence-free years, whereas low and intermediate risk tumors are followed utilizing
the 4-8-12 model where intervals between follow up are increased for patients without
recurrence until 5 disease-free years.3 The evidence behind these follow-up schedules is not
based on high level evidence and research but rather on tradition and 'clinical experience'.
Clinical challenge of current follow-up schedules The majority of patients with HG tumors
will have recurrence despite treatment, especially within the two first years after
diagnosis. Moreover, many patients will receive lifelong follow-up cystoscopy and urinary
cytology tests. Follow-up schedules are costly due to many visits at the hospital for
flexible cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and treatment. A micro-costing analysis performed by
the Urological Research Unit at Aarhus University Hospital prior to initiation of the current
study, has shown that the total expense in relation to flexible cystoscopy in the outpatient
clinic is approximately 315 EUR per examination (Appendix 1). Equally important to frequency
and cost of follow-up, every follow-up visit is associated with patient discomfort, pain,
risk of infections, and strictures of the urethra.6 Each cystoscopy carries a 15% risk of
complications. Nearly 1,500 cystoscopies are carried out in HG patients in Central Denmark
Region each year, resulting in approximately 240 complications each year, with cystitis being
the most common complication. Furthermore, flexible cystoscopy is not always reliable in
terms of diagnosing recurrences and CIS.7-9
Urinary biomarkers A proposed alternative to flexible cystoscopy in the detection of
recurrent NMBIC is non-invasive molecular urinary markers that detect mRNA, protein or DNA
from selected genes relevant for bladder cancer in urine samples. Several studies have been
prospectively validated and shown high sensitivity and specificity for urinary markers.10,11
Recently, the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor test was shown by Valenberg et al.12 to have a
sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 76% for HG disease and similarly D'Elia et al.13 showed
a specificity of 77% and sensitivity of 46% for a cohort of mainly LG patients. However,
studies have until now focused mainly on detection of NMIBC in patients with incident tumors,
which are most often larger and more easily diagnosed with urinary biomarkers than
recurrences.14 To our knowledge, no studies have so far substituted cystoscopies for urinary
biomarkers in a randomized controlled setting. Thus, the need for high level evidence
regarding the use of urinary biomarkers for surveillance of NMIBC is still there.