Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Clinical Trial
— CHARISMAOfficial title:
Community Health Clinic Model for Agency in Relationships and Safer Microbicide Adherence (CHARISMA) Expansion Study
| Verified date | January 2023 |
| Source | RTI International |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The CHARISMA Expansion Study is a two-arm, randomized (1:1), controlled study of a behavioral intervention-the Community Health clinic model for Agency in Relationships and Safer Microbicide Adherence (CHARISMA)-to reduce social harms (SHs) and intimate partner violence (IPV), increase healthy relationship dynamics and oral PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) TDF/FTC (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine), hereafter called PrEP, adherence among enrolled women. This study is an expansion of the CHARISMA intervention pilot study which was appended to the Microbicide Trials Network (MTN)-025 HOPE (HIV Open Label Prevention Extension) study. CHARISMA is defined by the use of a tool, called the CHARISMA HEAlthy Relationship Assessment Tool (HEART) used in combination with three counselling modules: - Module A: General Partner Communication and Relationship Skills - Module B: Partner Disclosure and Communication around PrEP Use - Module C: Responding to Intimate Partner Violence and Safety Planning
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 407 |
| Est. completion date | May 25, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | May 25, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | Female |
| Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Able and willing to provide written informed consent and locator information - Reports having a current male primary partner, - Sexually active, defined by vaginal intercourse with a male at least 4 times per month in the past 3 months and plan to be sexually active during the study duration - Not pregnant (defined by urine pregnancy testing) and not breastfeeding - Not planning on becoming pregnant in the next 6 months - English or Zulu speaking - HIV negative based on negative HIV rapid tests, at the time of enrollment Exclusion Criteria: - Previously participated in a clinical trial or a longitudinal HIV prevention research study - Unwilling to use daily oral PrEP - Has any significant medical condition or other condition that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (PI)/designee, would preclude informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Africa | Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI) | Johannesburg |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| RTI International | FHI 360, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute |
South Africa,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | PrEP adherence/persistence by measurement | Adherence will be ascertained through measurement of TFV-DP (tenofovir-diphosphate) in dried blood spot (DBS) specimens. DBS collected via blood draw at Month 3 and 6 follow-up visits will be used for retrospective PCR testing for tenofovir levels (although DBS is collected at Enrollment and Month 1 as well). | 3 months | |
| Primary | PrEP adherence/persistence by measurement | Adherence will be ascertained through measurement of TFV-DP in DBS specimens. DBS collected via blood draw at Month 3 and 6 follow-up visits will be used for retrospective PCR testing for tenofovir levels (although DBS is collected at Enrollment and Month 1 as well). | 6 months | |
| Primary | PrEP adherence/persistence by self-report | Self-reported data on PrEP adherence will be collected via standardized questionnaires to better understand patterns of PrEP use and reasons for poor adherence or discontinuation. The tool used for the assessment is the WHO Violence Against Women Survey (VAWS). VAWS consists of behavior-specific items related to psychological (four items), physical (six items) and sexual violence (three items). The physical violence items are further divided into 'moderate' (the two first items) and 'severe' (the following four items) violence based on the likelihood of physical injury. Values are considered worse as responses to experiences of violence increase from no=0, to one=1, few=2, and many=3 times. | 3 months | |
| Primary | PrEP adherence/persistence by self-report | Self-reported data on PrEP adherence will be collected via standardized questionnaires to better understand patterns of PrEP use and reasons for poor adherence or discontinuation. The tool used for the assessment is the WHO VAWS. VAWS consists of behavior-specific items related to psychological (four items), physical (six items) and sexual violence (three items). The physical violence items are further divided into 'moderate' (the two first items) and 'severe' (the following four items) violence based on the likelihood of physical injury. Values are considered worse as responses to experiences of violence increase from no=0, to one=1, few=2, and many=3 times. | 6 months | |
| Primary | Incidence of social harms (SHs) using a SHs questionnaire | SH in this study could include negative consequences related to study participation, PrEP use disclosure, stigma, gender-based violence, and relationship problems. Participants will be screened for SH resulting from product use or study participation at Enrollment, Month 3, and Month 6, and may report a social harm to staff at any time during the study. | Anytime during the study, up to 6 months | |
| Primary | IPV: Self-report of a) any IPV or b) physical or sexual IPV during study participation. | All participants will receive SOC IPV screening at enrollment and at the Month 3 and Month 6 visits and may report IPV to staff at any time during the study. SOC IPV screening will include clinical screening with a validated IPV measurement tool-the WHO VAWS. The WHO considers the VAWS to be a valid and reliable measure of GBV (gender-based violence) and is therefore a reasonable SOC screening tool for this study. | Anytime during the study, up to 6 months | |
| Primary | Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire | Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed:
Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics. All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits. |
Enrollment | |
| Primary | Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire | Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed:
Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits. |
1 month | |
| Primary | Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire | Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed:
Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits. |
3 months | |
| Primary | Percent of participants who disclosed PrEP product use to a partner, which is reported via a questionnaire | Consistent with the primary objective to determine the effect of CHARISMA on participants' relationship dynamics, the following endpoints will be assessed:
Disclosure of PrEP use to male partners: Self-report that participants have told their partners that they are using PrEP Male partner support for product use: Self-report that male partners support or accept (i.e. do not oppose) their PrEP use Communication with male partners: Self-report of partnership communication dynamics All participants will be asked about relationship dynamics, including disclosure of PrEP use, support for product use, and communication during enrollment, month 3, and 6 follow-up visits, and as needed during month 1 visits. |
6 months | |
| Secondary | Acceptability and feasibility assessed by intervention tool utilization as reported in response to a questionnaire".- | Consistent with the secondary objective to explore the acceptability and feasibility of CHARISMA, the following endpoint will be assessed:
• Acceptability: Participant ranking of intervention components |
6 months | |
| Secondary | Acceptability and feasibility assessed by participants' accounts of utilizing the CHARISMA intervention, as reported during an interview. | Consistent with the secondary objective to explore the acceptability and feasibility of CHARISMA, the following endpoint will be assessed:
• Acceptability: Participant qualitative report via interview |
6 months | |
| Secondary | Acceptability and feasibility assessed by participants' accounts of utilizing the CHARISMA intervention, as reported during an interview. | Consistent with the secondary objective to explore the acceptability and feasibility of CHARISMA, the following endpoint will be assessed:
• Acceptability: Participant qualitative report via interview |
9 months | |
| Secondary | Feasibility of the CHARISMA intervention - Time to completion | Consistent with the secondary objective to explore the acceptability and feasibility of CHARISMA, the following endpoint will be assessed:
• Feasibility: Process indicator of time to completion. |
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months | |
| Secondary | Percentage of participants who complete the intervention as outlined by the protocol, assessed via case report forms | Consistent with the secondary objective to explore the acceptability and feasibility of CHARISMA, the following endpoint will be assessed:
• Feasibility: Process indicator of intervention fidelity |
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months | |
| Secondary | Feasibility of the CHARISMA intervention - Measure of surveys and modules completed | Consistent with the secondary objective to explore the acceptability and feasibility of CHARISMA, the following endpoint will be assessed:
• Feasibility: Process indicator of percentage of surveys and modules completed |
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months | |
| Secondary | Feasibility of the CHARISMA intervention - Percentage of missing data | Consistent with the secondary objective to explore the acceptability and feasibility of CHARISMA, the following endpoint will be assessed:
• Feasibility: Process indicator of percentage of missing HEART data. |
Anytime during the study, up to 6 months | |
| Secondary | Sensitivity and specificity of a brief intimate partner violence (IPV) screening tool compared to a longer validated tool in identifying cases of IPV. | All participants will receive IPV screening at enrollment and at the Month 3 and Month 6 visits. SOC IPV screening will include clinical screening with a validated IPV measurement tool-the WHO VAWS. The WHO considers the VAWS to be a valid and reliable measure of GBV and is therefore a reasonable SOC screening tool for this study. | 3 months | |
| Secondary | Sensitivity and specificity of a brief IPV screening tool compared to a longer validated tool in identifying cases of IPV. | All participants will receive IPV screening at enrollment and at the Month 3 and Month 6 visits. SOC IPV screening will include clinical screening with a validated IPV measurement tool-the WHO VAWS. The WHO considers the VAWS to be a valid and reliable measure of GBV and is therefore a reasonable SOC screening tool for this study. | 6 months |